Comments on: Supreme Court Upholds Soloman Act 8-0

By: LJD

LJD — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 15:23:56 +0000

DA-

Did you have anything relevant at all to comment about the original post, or are you just blabbering?

By: Devil's Advocate

Devil's Advocate — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 14:29:38 +0000

Hate? Don't flatter yourself. I would not want to waste energy hating the likes of you.

Boundless contempt is more like it. As far as I am concerned, the bushies are the dregs of humanity.

By the way, only 1/3 of Americans now support Bush. 1/3 of Americans are morbidly obese. I wonder if this is the same 1/3? That would explain a lot...

By: Herb

Herb — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 02:16:50 +0000

WOW, Devils Advocate has a lot of Hate and Discontent bottled up inside his little mind, doesn't he?

I bet he's a lefty.

By: Small Town Veteran

Small Town Veteran — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:37:55 +0000

SCOTUS Upholds Solomon Amendment...

Elections have consequences, friends. Gradually, ever so gradually, the grown-ups are regaining control. Faster, please. (Would someone please wake Justice Ginsburg and tell her it's time to retire?)Supreme Court Rules Against Schools in Military Recr...

By: Jim

Jim — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:37:02 +0000

Of course the Devil's Advocate doesn't have the courage of his convictions since his e-mail address isn't part of his comment.

By: floyd

floyd — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 22:36:19 +0000

again it is unacceptable to state the obvious without provoking the ire of the extreme left wing lynch mobs,who ostensibly champion free speech[lol]... kill the light ,or run for the woodwork!

By: Devil's Advocate

Devil's Advocate — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 22:18:18 +0000

Legion,

They are angry because they are among the 34% minority that supports Bush. They are angry because they swallowed BushCo's b.s. hook, line, and sinker, and now they are confronted, every day, day after day, with evidence that Bush is an incompetent, an intellectual dwarf, a sociopathic liar, a thief, a law-breaker, and a dictator. Their emperor is butt-naked for the world to see.

Of course, being right nutters, i.e., having a low I.Q. in addition to being pathologically insane, they are incapable of admitting mistakes. So, they are desperately clinging to their myth.

Watch for them to get more desperate hence angrier as the months go by and the full extent of the criminality of the Bush Administration and the Republican Congress is exposed.

BUSHIES = ZOMBIES

By: Herb

Herb — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 21:28:28 +0000

Now we will all be able to see if these schoo;s that banned the recruiters have the courage of their convictions.

My money would be on the schools taking the money and forgetting all about their convictions.
The spineless bast**ds.

By: Brian

Brian — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 21:28:03 +0000

It may surprise some commenters here, but there are many liberals (myself included) that believe that this was the right ruling. After all, Title IX was imposed virtually the same way.

LJD: Clinton is really not very popular here on the liberal left. Most of his support is from more centrist members of the party. And if Hilary gets the nomination, it won't be because of the far left either. We seem to be moving for Feingold at this point.

By: legion

legion — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 21:27:29 +0000

It's amazing how angry some wingers can be, even when they get ostensibly _good_ news for their cause...

By: Jack Ehrlich

Jack Ehrlich — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:49:43 +0000

Devils advocate. Do you understand the difference between a recruiter and a draft board? Service in the Texas Air National guard, flying F102s is a lot more than his predecessor did. Cheney has devoted his life to public service. With whom did you serve? The SDS or the Weathermen? Bush gained wealth in oil, Clinton gained wealth by selling technology to the Chinese. His butt ugly wife gained wealth by lying about history in books, sold to you and your ilk.

By: Wulf

Wulf — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:40:41 +0000

I think it is important to note that the justices did not imply that Congress could use the Solomon Amendment to order to force schools to admit recruiters. It seemed to me more like a matter of saying in arguments that the outcome of this case on the Solomon Amendment could not possibly restrict Congress in its greater ability to raise armies.

This decision is pretty clear in saying that recruiters can be banned from campus by any school that refuses funds (page 9, just a couple of paragraphs after what you quote).

By: LJD

LJD — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:06:51 +0000

Sour grapes to some, are very sweet for others.

By: BizzyBlog.com

BizzyBlog.com — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:00:43 +0000

Supreme Court to Universities: If You Accept Federal $, You Have to Accept the Strings Attached...

The point was made unanimously:

Court Upholds Campus Military Recruiting
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday that colleges that accept federal money must allow military recruiters on campus, despite university objecti...

By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator

Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 17:47:17 +0000

Campus Military Recruiting Law Upheld...

The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that colleges that accept federal money must allow military recr...