<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Takes Abortion Parental Notification Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/supreme_court_takes_abortion_parental_notification_case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/supreme_court_takes_abortion_parental_notification_case/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:20:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blogcritics</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/supreme_court_takes_abortion_parental_notification_case/comment-page-1/#comment-46780</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogcritics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 13:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10641#comment-46780</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SCOTUS to hear Pedophiles for Choice case&lt;/strong&gt;

...This will upset pedophiles...who prefer their deeds be done anonymously and without the knowledge of any âmeddlingâ parents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SCOTUS to hear Pedophiles for Choice case</strong></p>
<p>...This will upset pedophiles...who prefer their deeds be done anonymously and without the knowledge of any âmeddlingâ parents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackLewis.net</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/supreme_court_takes_abortion_parental_notification_case/comment-page-1/#comment-46775</link>
		<dc:creator>JackLewis.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 13:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10641#comment-46775</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SCOTUS to hear Pedophiles for Choice case&lt;/strong&gt;

From LifeNews: The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a New Hampshire case about whether abortion facilities should notify parents...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SCOTUS to hear Pedophiles for Choice case</strong></p>
<p>From LifeNews: The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a New Hampshire case about whether abortion facilities should notify parents...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/supreme_court_takes_abortion_parental_notification_case/comment-page-1/#comment-46700</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 20:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10641#comment-46700</guid>
		<description>As the Supremes have shown, &quot;precedents, we don&#039;t need no damn precedents.&quot;  What makes you think any future court will respect the precedents established in this manner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the Supremes have shown, "precedents, we don't need no damn precedents."  What makes you think any future court will respect the precedents established in this manner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/supreme_court_takes_abortion_parental_notification_case/comment-page-1/#comment-46697</link>
		<dc:creator>bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 19:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10641#comment-46697</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;even minor children have the right to an abortion absent parental notification if they can convince a judge that their parents might get upset.&lt;/em&gt;

Care to cite a scotus case on this? I was not aware that parental notification had that caveat per case law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>even minor children have the right to an abortion absent parental notification if they can convince a judge that their parents might get upset.</em></p>
<p>Care to cite a scotus case on this? I was not aware that parental notification had that caveat per case law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
