<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Synchronized Trimming (Updated)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/synchronized_trimming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/synchronized_trimming/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:10:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/synchronized_trimming/comment-page-1/#comment-516670</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=25959#comment-516670</guid>
		<description>OK, here&#039;s oe you&#039;re going to have problems with answering;

At what point would it NOT be tyranny? What in your estimattion is the threshold?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, here's oe you're going to have problems with answering;</p>
<p>At what point would it NOT be tyranny? What in your estimattion is the threshold?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/synchronized_trimming/comment-page-1/#comment-516663</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=25959#comment-516663</guid>
		<description>I think that if there were enough consensus on basics for it there would be advantages to world government. In the abstract.

We don&#039;t agree on basic liberty issues and legal issues with the United Kingdom, France, or Germany, countries with whom we have close cultural ties let alone countries from whom we are culturally and historically much farther distant.


But right now there isn&#039;t enough consensus, I can&#039;t imagine such a thing for centuries if ever, and any attempt to impose such a thing before there is such a consensus would be tyranny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that if there were enough consensus on basics for it there would be advantages to world government. In the abstract.</p>
<p>We don't agree on basic liberty issues and legal issues with the United Kingdom, France, or Germany, countries with whom we have close cultural ties let alone countries from whom we are culturally and historically much farther distant.</p>
<p>But right now there isn't enough consensus, I can't imagine such a thing for centuries if ever, and any attempt to impose such a thing before there is such a consensus would be tyranny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/synchronized_trimming/comment-page-1/#comment-516615</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=25959#comment-516615</guid>
		<description>So it would seem.

Another point:

&lt;blockquote&gt;I continue to believe that we’re not ready for world government. Government requires consensus and there’s just not enough consensus on basics around the world to make world government practicable or just. 

But ready or not we’re going to see greater coordination among central banks and governments than ever before.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I shouldn&#039;t want to misunderstand you, but this sounds like you&#039;d LIKE to see &#039;world government&#039;, and see that as a GOOD thing. 

For the record, I don&#039;t. 

As a computer tech, I am reminded constantly that computers make mistakes more efficiently than man of his own power could ever accomplish. I view world government in much the same way; Given that&lt;strong&gt; our recent debacle is a failure of government&lt;/strong&gt;, (And of that, most of it by people who wouldn&#039;t mind seeing world government enacted)  and managed to screw things up worldwide, in spite of the lack of streamlined governmental efficiency that such government would suppsoedly bring, one wonders if we&#039;d not be totally screwed today under a world government, instead of just MOSTLY screwed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it would seem.</p>
<p>Another point:</p>
<blockquote><p>I continue to believe that we&rsquo;re not ready for world government. Government requires consensus and there&rsquo;s just not enough consensus on basics around the world to make world government practicable or just. </p>
<p>But ready or not we&rsquo;re going to see greater coordination among central banks and governments than ever before.</p></blockquote>
<p>I shouldn't want to misunderstand you, but this sounds like you'd LIKE to see 'world government', and see that as a GOOD thing. </p>
<p>For the record, I don't. </p>
<p>As a computer tech, I am reminded constantly that computers make mistakes more efficiently than man of his own power could ever accomplish. I view world government in much the same way; Given that<strong> our recent debacle is a failure of government</strong>, (And of that, most of it by people who wouldn't mind seeing world government enacted)  and managed to screw things up worldwide, in spite of the lack of streamlined governmental efficiency that such government would suppsoedly bring, one wonders if we'd not be totally screwed today under a world government, instead of just MOSTLY screwed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/synchronized_trimming/comment-page-1/#comment-516539</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=25959#comment-516539</guid>
		<description>Although the mythic value of the dollar as the currency of last resort has no doubt been tarnished by the events of the last year, its reasonable analytic value in that role remains secure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the mythic value of the dollar as the currency of last resort has no doubt been tarnished by the events of the last year, its reasonable analytic value in that role remains secure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/synchronized_trimming/comment-page-1/#comment-516529</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=25959#comment-516529</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Or, said another way, the financial crisis is causing a slowing of economic activity and reduction in demand for commodities and this is no time to worry about inflation.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I take the point, but it would seem that elsewhere around the world inflation is happening anyway and at a pretty impressive rate, given the speed of increase of the value of the dollar as comapred to other currencies these last few weeks.... which is, we&#039;re told, much of the reason for the drop in the price of oil of late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Or, said another way, the financial crisis is causing a slowing of economic activity and reduction in demand for commodities and this is no time to worry about inflation.</p></blockquote>
<p>I take the point, but it would seem that elsewhere around the world inflation is happening anyway and at a pretty impressive rate, given the speed of increase of the value of the dollar as comapred to other currencies these last few weeks.... which is, we're told, much of the reason for the drop in the price of oil of late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markm</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/synchronized_trimming/comment-page-1/#comment-516521</link>
		<dc:creator>markm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=25959#comment-516521</guid>
		<description>Huh...suckered me in with the headline. I thought it had something to do with Hugh Hefner&#039;s new gals....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh...suckered me in with the headline. I thought it had something to do with Hugh Hefner's new gals....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
