<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Testing Word Posting Feature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/testing_word_posting_feature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/testing_word_posting_feature/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:10:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/testing_word_posting_feature/comment-page-1/#comment-148766</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/09/testing_word_posting_feature/#comment-148766</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Actually, I was suggesting that Wordpress add one of the two into their default setup. I&#039;m kind of surprised they haven&#039;t.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, that would make sense.  There are all manner of problems with composing longish posts in the WordPress editor, although that&#039;s what I&#039;ve mostly done.  I&#039;ve tried various external editors and never been happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Actually, I was suggesting that Wordpress add one of the two into their default setup. I'm kind of surprised they haven't.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, that would make sense.  There are all manner of problems with composing longish posts in the WordPress editor, although that's what I've mostly done.  I've tried various external editors and never been happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/testing_word_posting_feature/comment-page-1/#comment-148751</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/09/testing_word_posting_feature/#comment-148751</guid>
		<description>Actually, I was suggesting that Wordpress add one of the two into their default setup.  I&#039;m kind of surprised they haven&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I was suggesting that Wordpress add one of the two into their default setup.  I'm kind of surprised they haven't.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/testing_word_posting_feature/comment-page-1/#comment-148696</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/09/testing_word_posting_feature/#comment-148696</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;An office suite to write blog posts? Isn&#039;t that overkill? Why not just incorporate something like FCKEditor or TinyMCE?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree that it would be silly to go out and pay $700 for an office suite for this purpose but most of us already have Word.  TinyMCE looks, at first glance at least, like a pain to set up.  FCKEditor looks promising enough but, really, it&#039;s not clear why downloading and installing and setting it up is any easier than just using one&#039;s word processing package.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>An office suite to write blog posts? Isn't that overkill? Why not just incorporate something like FCKEditor or TinyMCE?</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree that it would be silly to go out and pay $700 for an office suite for this purpose but most of us already have Word.  TinyMCE looks, at first glance at least, like a pain to set up.  FCKEditor looks promising enough but, really, it's not clear why downloading and installing and setting it up is any easier than just using one's word processing package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/testing_word_posting_feature/comment-page-1/#comment-148406</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 02:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/09/testing_word_posting_feature/#comment-148406</guid>
		<description>An office suite to write blog posts?  Isn&#039;t that overkill?  Why not just incorporate something like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fckeditor.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FCKEditor&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TinyMCE&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An office suite to write blog posts?  Isn't that overkill?  Why not just incorporate something like <a href="http://www.fckeditor.net/" rel="nofollow">FCKEditor</a> or <a href="http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/" rel="nofollow">TinyMCE</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/testing_word_posting_feature/comment-page-1/#comment-148206</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/09/testing_word_posting_feature/#comment-148206</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s built into Word.  All you need to do is set up the login info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's built into Word.  All you need to do is set up the login info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/testing_word_posting_feature/comment-page-1/#comment-148204</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/09/testing_word_posting_feature/#comment-148204</guid>
		<description>Is this attack in that has to be installed on your server?  Or on both ends?  I know what I was on the blogspot blog, the Word tack-on was invaluable to me.  
I&#039;d like to think what you&#039;re describing would also be that way, but it&#039;s going to be a couple of years before I get word 2007.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this attack in that has to be installed on your server?  Or on both ends?  I know what I was on the blogspot blog, the Word tack-on was invaluable to me.<br />
I'd like to think what you're describing would also be that way, but it's going to be a couple of years before I get word 2007.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
