Comments on: The Down Side of the Rule of Law http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_down_side_of_the_rule_of_law/ Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:22:53 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Gaijin Biker http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_down_side_of_the_rule_of_law/comment-page-1/#comment-88682 Gaijin Biker Tue, 04 Jul 2006 01:13:43 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/07/the_down_side_of_the_rule_of_law/#comment-88682 There is no statute of limitations for murder at, I believe, either the state or federal level. Racketeering, yes; murder, no. There is no statute of limitations for murder at, I believe, either the state or federal level. Racketeering, yes; murder, no.

]]> By: Shaun Kenney http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_down_side_of_the_rule_of_law/comment-page-1/#comment-88659 Shaun Kenney Mon, 03 Jul 2006 19:47:45 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/07/the_down_side_of_the_rule_of_law/#comment-88659 Where's the Boondock Saints when you need 'em? Where's the Boondock Saints when you need 'em?

]]> By: yetanotherjohn http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_down_side_of_the_rule_of_law/comment-page-1/#comment-88635 yetanotherjohn Mon, 03 Jul 2006 15:26:12 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/07/the_down_side_of_the_rule_of_law/#comment-88635 But there is also protection against being tried twice for the same event. So they may be off scot free. I agree that this is a case where the law is the law, as opposed to evidentiary exclusion which is a judicial rule promulgated by judges (not passed by legislators). The proper place to complain is the legislature. But there is also protection against being tried twice for the same event. So they may be off scot free.

I agree that this is a case where the law is the law, as opposed to evidentiary exclusion which is a judicial rule promulgated by judges (not passed by legislators). The proper place to complain is the legislature.

]]>