<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The End of Network News II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_end_of_network_news_ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_end_of_network_news_ii/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:03:01 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LJD</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_end_of_network_news_ii/comment-page-1/#comment-28942</link>
		<dc:creator>LJD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2004 12:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8346#comment-28942</guid>
		<description>Good riddance... and when will Jennings quit?  Stupid Canadian...
I was watching ABC news last night, it was my wife&#039;s turn to use the remote...
First the story about Pat Tillman, then stop-loss, then some other negative B.S. about our military.  

It went well beyond news reporting.  It became abundantly clear that his position is firmly against the war, but also against our men and women in uniform.  How else do you explain the repeated attempts to smear them?  We should deport his dumb ass.  Oh yeah, too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good riddance... and when will Jennings quit?  Stupid Canadian...<br />
I was watching ABC news last night, it was my wife's turn to use the remote...<br />
First the story about Pat Tillman, then stop-loss, then some other negative B.S. about our military.  </p>
<p>It went well beyond news reporting.  It became abundantly clear that his position is firmly against the war, but also against our men and women in uniform.  How else do you explain the repeated attempts to smear them?  We should deport his dumb ass.  Oh yeah, too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_end_of_network_news_ii/comment-page-1/#comment-28906</link>
		<dc:creator>bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2004 00:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8346#comment-28906</guid>
		<description>Funny, if you look at it, all three networks still have huge chunks of programming devoted to &quot;news.&quot; 60 Minutes II, 48 Hours, Nightline, 20/20, dateline ... maybe it&#039;s not the disappearance of network news, but the movement to the entertainment division.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, if you look at it, all three networks still have huge chunks of programming devoted to "news." 60 Minutes II, 48 Hours, Nightline, 20/20, dateline ... maybe it's not the disappearance of network news, but the movement to the entertainment division.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abstract Musings</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_end_of_network_news_ii/comment-page-1/#comment-28860</link>
		<dc:creator>Abstract Musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2004 19:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8346#comment-28860</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;End of the Road for the Nightly News?&lt;/strong&gt;
Could the days of evening network news broadcasts be numbered? Outside The Beltway points to an article in the Miami Herald which makes a compelling case for the eventual demise of the nightly news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>End of the Road for the Nightly News?</strong><br />
Could the days of evening network news broadcasts be numbered? Outside The Beltway points to an article in the Miami Herald which makes a compelling case for the eventual demise of the nightly news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_end_of_network_news_ii/comment-page-1/#comment-28844</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2004 16:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8346#comment-28844</guid>
		<description>I said this morning on my own Blog, regarding Brokaw...

&lt;i&gt;When Tom Teriffic showed up, NBC was in last place among the big three... Mostly because of the pompous, overbearing, and unabashedly leftist John Chancellor. Brokaw did what he could to reverse the situation. As of last week, when he stepped aside to make room for the glorified traffic reporter from Elmira, NY.... (yes, I remember WENY, Brian...) NBC was in first place among the big three. &lt;/i&gt;

However...

&lt;i&gt;Brokaw&#039;s real victory here was that he did a better job, in the end, of stemming the losses all three networks experienced through the period.&lt;/i&gt;

Are there any lessons that can be taken from this reletive posiitoning, I wonder, regarding the Demise of the Big Three, and the rise of such as Fox?

Perhaps a look at Brokaw&#039;s predecesor, the totally insufferable John Chancellor, can bring something to this discussion? If as I suppose, John Chancellor was responsible for NBC being in last place, what qualities did Browkaw have to turn that situation around?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I said this morning on my own Blog, regarding Brokaw...</p>
<p><i>When Tom Teriffic showed up, NBC was in last place among the big three... Mostly because of the pompous, overbearing, and unabashedly leftist John Chancellor. Brokaw did what he could to reverse the situation. As of last week, when he stepped aside to make room for the glorified traffic reporter from Elmira, NY.... (yes, I remember WENY, Brian...) NBC was in first place among the big three. </i></p>
<p>However...</p>
<p><i>Brokaw's real victory here was that he did a better job, in the end, of stemming the losses all three networks experienced through the period.</i></p>
<p>Are there any lessons that can be taken from this reletive posiitoning, I wonder, regarding the Demise of the Big Three, and the rise of such as Fox?</p>
<p>Perhaps a look at Brokaw's predecesor, the totally insufferable John Chancellor, can bring something to this discussion? If as I suppose, John Chancellor was responsible for NBC being in last place, what qualities did Browkaw have to turn that situation around?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_end_of_network_news_ii/comment-page-1/#comment-28839</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2004 15:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8346#comment-28839</guid>
		<description>This does look like the way things are going.  But it does bring up an interesting follow-up:  what will replace them?  The networks are still required to provide a certain amount of &#147;public service&#148; programming aren&#039;t they?  I guess it will be more news magazine programs like &lt;i&gt;20/20&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;60 Minutes&lt;/i&gt;.

The problem, of course, is that both reality shows and news magazines seem to have seen their ratings peak already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This does look like the way things are going.  But it does bring up an interesting follow-up:  what will replace them?  The networks are still required to provide a certain amount of &#8220;public service&#8221; programming aren't they?  I guess it will be more news magazine programs like <i>20/20</i> and <i>60 Minutes</i>.</p>
<p>The problem, of course, is that both reality shows and news magazines seem to have seen their ratings peak already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
