| I notice that you never respond to any information I give.

Gee... and I thought I was the only one who noticed that.

Ha, that is anjin's leitmotif.

LOL... Like I said, run along.

You really think this aids your endless quest for creds, do you?

Actually, your calling me a "troll" suggests that I have probably voted Democrat longer than you have been alive.

Really? You voted for Stevenson?

You are presenting a single post as your online resume? Funny, cause the rest of us have hundreds or thousands of them. So after a career consisting of one post, you just happen to show up on OTB, where the only Democrats are people who are pretty serious political bloggers. At the same time a bunch of other people none of us have never seen before show up spouting pretty much the same line of bs...

LOL... Like I said, run along.

I notice that you never respond to any information I give.

Gee... and I thought I was the only one who noticed that.

The US Park Police, the FBI, Robert Fiske, and Ken Starr were/are all in on the cover-up. If Clinton had been in the White House for 9/11 you would be a truther.

I note with some amusment that you're avoiding the question I posed.

Name some.

Talk Left, for one. But don't take my word for it; Go over to Memeorandum on the day when that story broke, and read the reactions for yourself. There's quite a number of models and colors to chose from.

This is a very interesting comment for someone who claims to be "a lifetime democrat". Because your phrasing makes it pretty obvious you are not a Democrat, not that there was really much doubt about that.

Run along troll boy...

Actually, your calling me a "troll" suggests that I have probably voted Democrat longer than you have been alive. I can say that the Democrats love denial precisely because I have a long history with this party that apparently lack. I have witnessed it's folly with Gore, Kerry, Carter, Dukakis, and Mondale. I am very familiar with my party's ability to deny very serious problems with it's electoral prospects.

I notice that you never respond to any information I give. I provided a quote from a Wash. Post forum with my same sreen name from Feb. 2007, that criticizes Clinton for going after Obama -- but saying that still supported Clinton; and I posted polling data indicating a number of Democratic defections. Rather than engaging that information, you, in a very juvenile fashion, simply call me a "troll." Well, suit yourself. This is the very type of behavior that has led many Clinton supporters to detatch themselves from the Obama movement. Since this behavior is so effective in turning away lifetime Democrats, perhaps YOU are the Republican, not I.....

There's no reason, and actually substantial negative, in McCain waiting to see what the Dems do first insofar as his picking Palin as VP, because, no matter who Obama picks, Palin is by far (and I mean far) the best pick for McCain and the GOP, especially in this time of GOP woes. The GOP can be seen as the party of real 'change' (albeit I hate that mantra, change, change, bla bla), while not really having to change from GOP core conservative values, which Palin more than represents.

In light of the current oil/energy situation, as well as the disaffected female Hillary voters situation, and growing focus on McCain's age and health, Palin is more than perfect -- now.

(Perhaps Team McCain is already on to this.)

Anjin-san, apparently the Democrats love denial.

This is a very interesting comment for someone who claims to be "a lifetime democrat". Because your phrasing makes it pretty obvious you are not a Democrat, not that there was really much doubt about that.

Run along troll boy...

Well, apparently you're unlike most Obama supporters, Anjin. Given their response to Clinton's RFK comments, they wouldn't put it past her to do such, if they came between her and political power.

Name some.

A Black Man Supporting Hillary Clinton and the Women Who Want More.....

"Funny how all these people we have never seen here before are suddenly popping up railing against Obama. The McCain camp already seems a bit desperate.

Keep those doggies trollig..."

Sorry, but I don't need to pretend to be a Clinton supporter to make my point. I am a lifetime Democrat, and if this seems implausible to you, then so be it. And I have been posting with this screen name long before the "divisions" started. For example, back in Feb. 2007, I made the following statement in the Washington Post:

I do not believe that Clinton should have said anything to Obama about the Geffen interview. Why not go after Geffen himself? I do support her campain, though, and find it appalling that people -- especially men -- criticize her as being "ambitious." All presidential candidates are ambitious; I suppose this is only negative for women candidates. Ambition is, in fact, a positive trait (as opposed to complacency). In fact, I pride myself on being ambitious. And like Obama, my ambition led me from growing up a poor, black household to becoming a double-Ivy Leaguer; I even managed to get accepted to an even higher ranked and more selective law school (yes, the one that Bill and Hilary attended).

Also, as for Clinton's endorsement of the legislation authorizing force in Iraq, the same people who are now decrying her vote supported Kerry and cheered the orchestrated demise of Howard Dean (who was the loudest candidate opposing the war). In the end, Clinton should not have directed her attention to Obama. So -- big blunder! But I do not see her as the monster that most do.

PS: Obama is as much a lawyer and politician as Hilary. And he strikes me as a very amibitious fellow (otherwise, why not just remain content with a secure Senate seat?).

Posted by: Tony Smith | February 21, 2007 6:06 PM

PS: I tried to post the link to this quote, but the Spam program kept blocking it. Just google the quote...

the outcry?

"the outcry" is mostly taking heads that need something to talk about...

Obama supporters are by in large focused on November. Like me, they found the comment distasteful, but nothing to raise your blood pressure about.