<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Hollow Army</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_hollow_army/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_hollow_army/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:10:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Toppenish</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_hollow_army/comment-page-1/#comment-12848</link>
		<dc:creator>Toppenish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5165#comment-12848</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the USFK in Korea should be cut down as well--they&#039;re doing pretty much a thankless task amongst an unappreciative people.  I doubt if South Korea would have sent soldiers to Iraq if ours weren&#039;t in Korea but it&#039;s hardly an equal trade.

As I see it, our main reason for staying in Korea is to prevent an ensuing nuclear arms race in East Asia that could likely follow a pullout.  Perhaps this could be still be accomplished with fewer of our troops there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the USFK in Korea should be cut down as well--they're doing pretty much a thankless task amongst an unappreciative people.  I doubt if South Korea would have sent soldiers to Iraq if ours weren't in Korea but it's hardly an equal trade.</p>
<p>As I see it, our main reason for staying in Korea is to prevent an ensuing nuclear arms race in East Asia that could likely follow a pullout.  Perhaps this could be still be accomplished with fewer of our troops there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dj of raleigh</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_hollow_army/comment-page-1/#comment-12849</link>
		<dc:creator>dj of raleigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5165#comment-12849</guid>
		<description>Return the Draft.
As unpopular as it is, a draftee army will not overthrown us.
Have no deferments for school, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Return the Draft.<br />
As unpopular as it is, a draftee army will not overthrown us.<br />
Have no deferments for school, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_hollow_army/comment-page-1/#comment-12850</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5165#comment-12850</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;As unpopular as it is, a draftee army will not overthrown us.&lt;/i&gt;

And I suppose we&#039;re in danger of being overthrown by the volunteer army? WTF?

Bringing back the draft would just play into the hands of the radical anti-American types in this country who &quot;support our troops when they shoot their officers.&quot;

Nice try, &quot;dj&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>As unpopular as it is, a draftee army will not overthrown us.</i></p>
<p>And I suppose we're in danger of being overthrown by the volunteer army? WTF?</p>
<p>Bringing back the draft would just play into the hands of the radical anti-American types in this country who "support our troops when they shoot their officers."</p>
<p>Nice try, "dj"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jalal Abu Jarhead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_hollow_army/comment-page-1/#comment-12851</link>
		<dc:creator>Jalal Abu Jarhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5165#comment-12851</guid>
		<description>That &lt;i&gt;does&lt;/i&gt; seem to be a rather, erm, odd suggestion.



---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That <i>does</i> seem to be a rather, erm, odd suggestion.</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
