<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Judicial Election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_judicial_election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_judicial_election/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:28:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Prather</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_judicial_election/comment-page-1/#comment-25298</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Prather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2004 17:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7731#comment-25298</guid>
		<description>Actually, I think it&#039;s the other way around: they didn&#039;t want to retire after having gotten involved in the 2000 election.  They were right to intervene -- the Florida Supremes didn&#039;t really give them a choice -- but the justices most likely to retire (O&#039;Connor and Rehnquist) are both Republican appointees.  The appearance would have been bad because the Democrats sufficiently, and hypocritically, demonized them for intervening in the election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I think it's the other way around: they didn't want to retire after having gotten involved in the 2000 election.  They were right to intervene -- the Florida Supremes didn't really give them a choice -- but the justices most likely to retire (O'Connor and Rehnquist) are both Republican appointees.  The appearance would have been bad because the Democrats sufficiently, and hypocritically, demonized them for intervening in the election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Attila Girl</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_judicial_election/comment-page-1/#comment-25294</link>
		<dc:creator>Attila Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2004 16:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7731#comment-25294</guid>
		<description>I wonder whether it&#039;s possible that a few of the justices anticipated another attempt to &quot;steal the election&quot; this November, and hung around another couple of years to prevent that. 

Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder whether it's possible that a few of the justices anticipated another attempt to "steal the election" this November, and hung around another couple of years to prevent that. </p>
<p>Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truth, Lies &#38; Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_judicial_election/comment-page-1/#comment-25286</link>
		<dc:creator>Truth, Lies &#38; Common Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7731#comment-25286</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sovereignty, Issue One&lt;/strong&gt;
George points out the importance of the Judiciary in our lives. I would like to add another L-phrase &quot;Loss sovereignty&quot;. These same liberal lawyers are assisting in negotiating international treaties. These treaties are constitutionally binding and a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sovereignty, Issue One</strong><br />
George points out the importance of the Judiciary in our lives. I would like to add another L-phrase "Loss sovereignty". These same liberal lawyers are assisting in negotiating international treaties. These treaties are constitutionally binding and a...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
