<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The North Korean Nuke Test:  It&#8217;s a Dessert Topping and a Floor Wax!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_north_korean_nuke_test_its_a_dessert_topping_and_a_floor_wax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_north_korean_nuke_test_its_a_dessert_topping_and_a_floor_wax/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:16:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_north_korean_nuke_test_its_a_dessert_topping_and_a_floor_wax/comment-page-1/#comment-1051164</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=36575#comment-1051164</guid>
		<description>I figured it was basically a combination of &quot;Don&#039;t you dare try to screw with us!&quot; (since the Nork government is pretty paranoid) and &quot;We demand more for giving it up!&quot; (meaning more aid, upfront, even before serious negotiations begin).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figured it was basically a combination of "Don't you dare try to screw with us!" (since the Nork government is pretty paranoid) and "We demand more for giving it up!" (meaning more aid, upfront, even before serious negotiations begin).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC Loser</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_north_korean_nuke_test_its_a_dessert_topping_and_a_floor_wax/comment-page-1/#comment-1050895</link>
		<dc:creator>DC Loser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 16:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=36575#comment-1050895</guid>
		<description>BigFire - I think you need to check your math. The MOAB is 18,700 lbs, making it 9.35 tons.  In contrast, 6kT is 6,000 tons.  Big difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BigFire - I think you need to check your math. The MOAB is 18,700 lbs, making it 9.35 tons.  In contrast, 6kT is 6,000 tons.  Big difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigFire</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_north_korean_nuke_test_its_a_dessert_topping_and_a_floor_wax/comment-page-1/#comment-1050886</link>
		<dc:creator>BigFire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=36575#comment-1050886</guid>
		<description>The news have been screaming about a Hiroshima scale detonation (17KT).  However, this particular test appears to be another sub 6kT yield, which makes it slightly bigger than USAF&#039;s MOAB.  If they&#039;re using AQ Khan&#039;s design they should&#039;ve expected higher yield.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The news have been screaming about a Hiroshima scale detonation (17KT).  However, this particular test appears to be another sub 6kT yield, which makes it slightly bigger than USAF's MOAB.  If they're using AQ Khan's design they should've expected higher yield.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
