The Repoxygen Olympics
 |
Kate | Monday, February 6, 2006 |
Four years ago in Salt Lake, the drug busters came up with a secret test for the blood booster Darbepoetin and caught out two cross-country skiers, Johann Muelegg of Spain and Larissa Lazutina of Russia. But if Repoxygen is used in Turin, the medics have got a headache. America’s Anti-doping Agency senior managing director, Larry Bowers, has already called it a “real threat”, while German biochemist Werner Franke said this week: “It is worse than in the GDR [former East Germany] and more brutal than Balco.”
The springboard for these dire pronouncements was an email German police found on the computer belonging to former east German coach to Katrin Krabbe, Thomas Springstein, who is on trial at the moment for doping under-age female athletes. The message complained how “difficult it is to get hold of Repoxygen. Please give me new instructions so that I can get hold of the product for Christmas”.
It was an historic moment: the moment that email was presented in open court was the exact moment when the latest stage of doping was officially confirmed. The era of genetic doping has arrived.
This stuff makes steroid use look like allowing your teenage daughter out wearing too much makeup.
I’ve never understood the reasoning of sports punditry who advocate opening wide the doors to atheletes to use whatever performance enhancing drugs they wish. While some of the regulations sound like overkill (caffeine?) what seems to be forgotten is the age at which elite atheletes begin training for Olympic careers.
It’s one thing to argue that a 24 year old NFL player has the right to fill his veins with Big Jim’s Extract of Bull Testicle – it’s quite another thing to give the chemical green light to a coach entrusted with the training of 11 year old gymnasts.
About the Author: Kate is a freelance commercial and automotive airbrush artist living in Saskatchewan, Canada. She was one of the original guest bloggers at OTB in November 2004 and soon joined the permanent stable, contributing through January 2007.
Eventually, she turned to writing full time at her own blog, small dead animals, which was voted the Best Canadian Blog in the 2004 Weblog Awards and has been generally considered that country's best blog ever since.
- None Found
- That’s What I Call A Loophole…
- Obama “Keeping An Eye” On Robots
- Phil Carter Quits Administration
- Census Worker Hanging Suicide, Not Right Wing Murder
- Swine flu is more popular than Dodd
- Paradox of Choice Paradoxically Untrue
- Private Forecasters Support Claim That Stimulus Worked
- Entertaining Kids During the Holidays
- How Much Will Escalation Cost?
- No Party of No
"I've never understood the reasoning of sports punditry who advocate opening wide the doors to atheletes to use whatever performance enhancing drugs they wish."
It is just homage to the competition gods - all that matters is that you win-not how you did it or most importantly-why you're in the game in the first place. If this is what it's about-then the liberals are right about controlling outcomes - declare everyone the winner now and close the place and board it up while you're at it as it has no value!
Any resemblance of the olimpics ans sports is purely accidental
I have to agree with you, on the idea of opening the doors wide to drug use.
I do think some of the substances are overkill-I always felt badly for the gymnast who had her medal stripped, because she was taking a cold medication.
I also don't see how pot is performance enhancing.
So perhaps they should revamp the rules of what drugs should be banned, and concentrate more on the drugs that are actually performance enhancing, and not worry too much about whether Johnny has had too much caffeine or needed to take some cold medications.
Comments are Closed
