<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Romney Myth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_romney_myth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_romney_myth/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:17:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_romney_myth/comment-page-1/#comment-138818</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/the_romney_myth/#comment-138818</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;His “dismal” fundraising is actually tops on the Republican side, sure he’s spent more, and thus had to put more money into his campaign, but he’s raise more money from outside sources than any Republican Candidate.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Huh?  No, he&#039;s raised far, far less than Giuliani from &quot;outside sources.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>His “dismal” fundraising is actually tops on the Republican side, sure he&rsquo;s spent more, and thus had to put more money into his campaign, but he&rsquo;s raise more money from outside sources than any Republican Candidate.</p></blockquote>
<p>Huh?  No, he's raised far, far less than Giuliani from "outside sources."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjalder26</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_romney_myth/comment-page-1/#comment-138813</link>
		<dc:creator>bjalder26</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/the_romney_myth/#comment-138813</guid>
		<description>Wow, horrible analysis, you’re only paying attention to national polls which are largely based on name recognition and familiarity, while completely ignoring the fact that Giuliani, Thompson, &amp; McCain don’t want to compete with him head on.  His “dismal” fundraising is actually tops on the Republican side, sure he’s spent more, and thus had to put more money into his campaign, but he’s raise more money from outside sources than any Republican Candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, horrible analysis, you&rsquo;re only paying attention to national polls which are largely based on name recognition and familiarity, while completely ignoring the fact that Giuliani, Thompson, &amp; McCain don&rsquo;t want to compete with him head on.  His “dismal” fundraising is actually tops on the Republican side, sure he&rsquo;s spent more, and thus had to put more money into his campaign, but he&rsquo;s raise more money from outside sources than any Republican Candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Hackbarth</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_romney_myth/comment-page-1/#comment-138794</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Hackbarth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/the_romney_myth/#comment-138794</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Traditionally, winning Iowa and New Hampshire created momentum that was nearly impossible to overcome. With the race so frontloaded, though, I’m dubious that this will matter at all.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I see the frontloading as making Iowa and New Hampshire even more important. Suppose Romney wins those two. With the compression there&#039;s so little time for any other candidate to steal momentum. There&#039;s no much time after Iowa and New Hampshire for anyone (yet along a primary voter) to breathe.

I see it like 2004 which wasn&#039;t nearly as compressed. Dean loses Iowa, screams, loses momentum, and gives Kerry the opening he needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Traditionally, winning Iowa and New Hampshire created momentum that was nearly impossible to overcome. With the race so frontloaded, though, I&rsquo;m dubious that this will matter at all.</p></blockquote>
<p>I see the frontloading as making Iowa and New Hampshire even more important. Suppose Romney wins those two. With the compression there's so little time for any other candidate to steal momentum. There's no much time after Iowa and New Hampshire for anyone (yet along a primary voter) to breathe.</p>
<p>I see it like 2004 which wasn't nearly as compressed. Dean loses Iowa, screams, loses momentum, and gives Kerry the opening he needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_romney_myth/comment-page-1/#comment-138788</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/the_romney_myth/#comment-138788</guid>
		<description>&quot;Slow and steady wins the race!&quot;

Romney&#039;s polling seems to be going entirely in the same direction all the time - up!  Look at the graph and compare it to McCain&#039;s abysmal polling.  Now ask yourself, who is a top tier candidate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Slow and steady wins the race!"</p>
<p>Romney's polling seems to be going entirely in the same direction all the time - up!  Look at the graph and compare it to McCain's abysmal polling.  Now ask yourself, who is a top tier candidate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_romney_myth/comment-page-1/#comment-138787</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/the_romney_myth/#comment-138787</guid>
		<description>These are national polls?  Since when do these matter in the primaries?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are national polls?  Since when do these matter in the primaries?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_romney_myth/comment-page-1/#comment-138766</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/the_romney_myth/#comment-138766</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Comment in violation of &lt;a href=&quot;http://otbmedia.org/policies.html&quot; title=&quot;OTB Site Policies&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;site policies&lt;/a&gt; deleted.&lt;/em&gt;

Those wishing to buy candidate advertising should send inquiries to otb@blogads.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Comment in violation of <a href="http://otbmedia.org/policies.html" title="OTB Site Policies" rel="nofollow">site policies</a> deleted.</em></p>
<p>Those wishing to buy candidate advertising should send inquiries to <a href="mailto:otb@blogads.com">otb@blogads.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just me</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_romney_myth/comment-page-1/#comment-138765</link>
		<dc:creator>just me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/the_romney_myth/#comment-138765</guid>
		<description>I agree a bit with Stormy on this one-I think Romney is a favorite among the GOP estalishment good ol&#039; boys, and they want to ram him down our throats.

That said, I am not so sure the GOP voter is willing to accept the annointing this go around.

I don&#039;t think Romney is exactly a top tier candidate, but unlike some of the other lower tier candidates, he does seem to have the ability to be a politician, and one of the current top tier candidates still hasn&#039;t announced-that candidate probably pulls from both Romney and Guliani.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree a bit with Stormy on this one-I think Romney is a favorite among the GOP estalishment good ol' boys, and they want to ram him down our throats.</p>
<p>That said, I am not so sure the GOP voter is willing to accept the annointing this go around.</p>
<p>I don't think Romney is exactly a top tier candidate, but unlike some of the other lower tier candidates, he does seem to have the ability to be a politician, and one of the current top tier candidates still hasn't announced-that candidate probably pulls from both Romney and Guliani.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yetanotherjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_romney_myth/comment-page-1/#comment-138752</link>
		<dc:creator>yetanotherjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/the_romney_myth/#comment-138752</guid>
		<description>I think the definition of Romney as a first tier candidate is legitimate. As you point out, he has a path that could realistically get him the nomination (take Iowa and NH, then use those for a springboard for Feb 5th knockout). How likely that path to success is a great debate, but it isn&#039;t a pipe dream. 

The &#039;also rans&#039; don&#039;t have that shot (neither in the polls nor the money). And lets be realistic, there is a very decent chance that we will see the 2008 republican convention with out a first round ballot win. At that point, any delegates you pick up could be key (to either the nomination or to the VP slot).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the definition of Romney as a first tier candidate is legitimate. As you point out, he has a path that could realistically get him the nomination (take Iowa and NH, then use those for a springboard for Feb 5th knockout). How likely that path to success is a great debate, but it isn't a pipe dream. </p>
<p>The 'also rans' don't have that shot (neither in the polls nor the money). And lets be realistic, there is a very decent chance that we will see the 2008 republican convention with out a first round ballot win. At that point, any delegates you pick up could be key (to either the nomination or to the VP slot).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_romney_myth/comment-page-1/#comment-138736</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/the_romney_myth/#comment-138736</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;m beginning to wonder if anybody is going to win the Republican nomination.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Somebody has to, I suppose.

The Republicans are in the same boat the Democrats were in in 2004:  Looking for the perfect guy.  Given the conflicts within the big Republican tent, that&#039;s not going to happen.  Ronald Reagan wouldn&#039;t be &quot;conservative&quot; enough were he running today.

My guess is that any of the top tier Republicans, save perhaps Romney, would be acceptable once he&#039;s a fait accompli.  Certainly, given Hillary as the likely opponent, there will be plenty of enthusiasm for the nominee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I'm beginning to wonder if anybody is going to win the Republican nomination.</p></blockquote>
<p>Somebody has to, I suppose.</p>
<p>The Republicans are in the same boat the Democrats were in in 2004:  Looking for the perfect guy.  Given the conflicts within the big Republican tent, that's not going to happen.  Ronald Reagan wouldn't be "conservative" enough were he running today.</p>
<p>My guess is that any of the top tier Republicans, save perhaps Romney, would be acceptable once he's a fait accompli.  Certainly, given Hillary as the likely opponent, there will be plenty of enthusiasm for the nominee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_romney_myth/comment-page-1/#comment-138730</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/the_romney_myth/#comment-138730</guid>
		<description>This directly following a post about Giuliani&#039;s decline matching McCain&#039;s decline.  I&#039;m beginning to wonder if anybody is going to win the Republican nomination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This directly following a post about Giuliani's decline matching McCain's decline.  I'm beginning to wonder if anybody is going to win the Republican nomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_romney_myth/comment-page-1/#comment-138710</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/the_romney_myth/#comment-138710</guid>
		<description>Could the spreading of this myth, be a diversionary tactic away from the real leaders, thereby misdirecting the republican primary electorate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could the spreading of this myth, be a diversionary tactic away from the real leaders, thereby misdirecting the republican primary electorate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moonage Political Webdream</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_romney_myth/comment-page-1/#comment-138708</link>
		<dc:creator>Moonage Political Webdream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/the_romney_myth/#comment-138708</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rudy Giuliani and the religious right...&lt;/strong&gt;

Two friends of mine, Stormwarning and American Phoenix have posted similar feelings about Rudy Giuliani.  Specifically, in regards to the perception Rudy has been accepted, if not endorsed, by the religious right.  I don&#8217;t see this as what&#8217;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rudy Giuliani and the religious right...</strong></p>
<p>Two friends of mine, Stormwarning and American Phoenix have posted similar feelings about Rudy Giuliani.  Specifically, in regards to the perception Rudy has been accepted, if not endorsed, by the religious right.  I don&#8217;t see this as what&#8217;...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stormy Dragon</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_romney_myth/comment-page-1/#comment-138694</link>
		<dc:creator>Stormy Dragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/the_romney_myth/#comment-138694</guid>
		<description>I hope your right, but I get the feeling about Romney that I got about George W. Bush in 2000: namely that the party establishment has decided he&#039;s the candidate and thus we&#039;re going to have him rammed down our throats until we accept him as inevitable, whether we like him or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope your right, but I get the feeling about Romney that I got about George W. Bush in 2000: namely that the party establishment has decided he's the candidate and thus we're going to have him rammed down our throats until we accept him as inevitable, whether we like him or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
