<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ungoverned</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_ungoverned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_ungoverned/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:35:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: charles johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_ungoverned/comment-page-1/#comment-532256</link>
		<dc:creator>charles johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=28132#comment-532256</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re finding out in Afghanistan that those kinds of hard-terrain, lawless tribal regions are essentially uncontrollable by foreign armies. We&#039;ve been in Afghanistan for 7 years now and we control little more than Kabul. We aren&#039;t doing much better than the Soviets did there, and we&#039;re going to have to go home at some point and it looks like when we do, the Taliban will reestablish control. Expanding our Afghanistan stalemate into Pakistan would not be wise. It would accomplish more of what we&#039;re accomplishing in Afghanistan--nothing--while costing still more lives and billions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We're finding out in Afghanistan that those kinds of hard-terrain, lawless tribal regions are essentially uncontrollable by foreign armies. We've been in Afghanistan for 7 years now and we control little more than Kabul. We aren't doing much better than the Soviets did there, and we're going to have to go home at some point and it looks like when we do, the Taliban will reestablish control. Expanding our Afghanistan stalemate into Pakistan would not be wise. It would accomplish more of what we're accomplishing in Afghanistan--nothing--while costing still more lives and billions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: International Retaliations (The Trouble With&#8230;) - The Opinionator Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_ungoverned/comment-page-1/#comment-531620</link>
		<dc:creator>International Retaliations (The Trouble With&#8230;) - The Opinionator Blog - NYTimes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=28132#comment-531620</guid>
		<description>[...] Dave Schuler at Outside the Beltway thinks Kagan&#8217;s idea is admirable but, like so many of its ilk, founders on the shoals of reality: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dave Schuler at Outside the Beltway thinks Kagan&#8217;s idea is admirable but, like so many of its ilk, founders on the shoals of reality: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_ungoverned/comment-page-1/#comment-531582</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=28132#comment-531582</guid>
		<description>How about Pakistan approaching the real powers of the world and saying:
&quot;This is beyond our ability to control. Can you help us out, here?&quot; ... seems aresponsible way to go. To some degree that is what Mushariff tried to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Pakistan approaching the real powers of the world and saying:<br />
"This is beyond our ability to control. Can you help us out, here?" ... seems aresponsible way to go. To some degree that is what Mushariff tried to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_ungoverned/comment-page-1/#comment-531526</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=28132#comment-531526</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That’s why, rather than undermining the Westphalian system by strengthening generally unaccountable international institutions or non-government actors, I favor supporting it. Pakistan needs to be held accountable for what goes on within its borders. That’s the international consensus we should be seeking.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Who is going to hold Pakistan accountable? Are you suggesting India go to war against Pakistan over this incident?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That&rsquo;s why, rather than undermining the Westphalian system by strengthening generally unaccountable international institutions or non-government actors, I favor supporting it. Pakistan needs to be held accountable for what goes on within its borders. That&rsquo;s the international consensus we should be seeking.</p></blockquote>
<p>Who is going to hold Pakistan accountable? Are you suggesting India go to war against Pakistan over this incident?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Glittering Eye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What To Do, What To Do?</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_ungoverned/comment-page-1/#comment-531509</link>
		<dc:creator>The Glittering Eye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What To Do, What To Do?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=28132#comment-531509</guid>
		<description>[...] Outside the Beltway this morning I&#8217;ve published a pair of posts on international relations. The first is a response to Robert Kagan&#8217;s column urging the international community to respond to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Outside the Beltway this morning I&#8217;ve published a pair of posts on international relations. The first is a response to Robert Kagan&#8217;s column urging the international community to respond to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jules Crittenden &#187; The Obama Doctrine</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_ungoverned/comment-page-1/#comment-531504</link>
		<dc:creator>Jules Crittenden &#187; The Obama Doctrine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=28132#comment-531504</guid>
		<description>[...] Outside the Beltway: Because that&#8217;s worked so well! How about Bushizing the international response. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Outside the Beltway: Because that&#8217;s worked so well! How about Bushizing the international response. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/the_ungoverned/comment-page-1/#comment-531498</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=28132#comment-531498</guid>
		<description>Well, two things.
The UN has been worse than useless in the matter, as they usually are.

Secondly, that Kagen thinks a response is needed in Pakistan suggests by extnsion that a response was needed to the very same symptoms in Iraq and Afghanistan... how ever that was to be had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, two things.<br />
The UN has been worse than useless in the matter, as they usually are.</p>
<p>Secondly, that Kagen thinks a response is needed in Pakistan suggests by extnsion that a response was needed to the very same symptoms in Iraq and Afghanistan... how ever that was to be had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
