<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Electoral College Tie?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/theagitatorcom_wishful_thinking_comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/theagitatorcom_wishful_thinking_comments/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:40:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BlueOregon</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/theagitatorcom_wishful_thinking_comments/comment-page-1/#comment-25804</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueOregon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 01:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7532#comment-25804</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Richie Robb: the most powerful man in America?&lt;/strong&gt;
Richie Robb is the the mayor of South Charleston, West Virginia. And if the electoral map falls just so, he may turn out to be the most powerful man in America. You see, he&#039;s one of the five GOP electors</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Richie Robb: the most powerful man in America?</strong><br />
Richie Robb is the the mayor of South Charleston, West Virginia. And if the electoral map falls just so, he may turn out to be the most powerful man in America. You see, he's one of the five GOP electors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Roos</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/theagitatorcom_wishful_thinking_comments/comment-page-1/#comment-25082</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Roos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7532#comment-25082</guid>
		<description>This is most certainly unconsititutional for exactly the reason cited earlier; the state legislature&#039;s power with respect to the allocation of electors is pleanary. This question was at the CENTER of Bush v. Gore just four years ago. 

Supporters of this initiative are wasting their time; the question of whether a state constitution can direct the legislature with respect to the electoral college has been asked and answered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is most certainly unconsititutional for exactly the reason cited earlier; the state legislature's power with respect to the allocation of electors is pleanary. This question was at the CENTER of Bush v. Gore just four years ago. </p>
<p>Supporters of this initiative are wasting their time; the question of whether a state constitution can direct the legislature with respect to the electoral college has been asked and answered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Stitch in Haste</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/theagitatorcom_wishful_thinking_comments/comment-page-1/#comment-24148</link>
		<dc:creator>A Stitch in Haste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7532#comment-24148</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Electoral College: Did I Say &quot;Glacier Speed&quot;?&lt;/strong&gt;
The best way to scrap the Electoral College is not to scrap it at all, but rather to amend it to the District Method of allocating electoral votes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Electoral College: Did I Say "Glacier Speed"?</strong><br />
The best way to scrap the Electoral College is not to scrap it at all, but rather to amend it to the District Method of allocating electoral votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul R. Stoetzer</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/theagitatorcom_wishful_thinking_comments/comment-page-1/#comment-24147</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul R. Stoetzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7532#comment-24147</guid>
		<description>James: Thanks for the information about ex post facto laws, and blame the fact that I did not read the entire article for my posting the part about the legislatures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James: Thanks for the information about ex post facto laws, and blame the fact that I did not read the entire article for my posting the part about the legislatures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/theagitatorcom_wishful_thinking_comments/comment-page-1/#comment-24146</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7532#comment-24146</guid>
		<description>Paul:  My post mentions the second part of that.  My understanding of the restriction on ex post facto laws is that it applies only to criminal matters. For example, a tax cut--or tax hike--that&#039;s retroactive wouldn&#039;t be considered unconstitutional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul:  My post mentions the second part of that.  My understanding of the restriction on ex post facto laws is that it applies only to criminal matters. For example, a tax cut--or tax hike--that's retroactive wouldn't be considered unconstitutional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul R. Stoetzer</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/theagitatorcom_wishful_thinking_comments/comment-page-1/#comment-24145</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul R. Stoetzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7532#comment-24145</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this unconstitutional in two fashions? First, it seems to be ex post facto. Second, it violates Article II, Section I, Clause 2: Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress. The legislature would not have directed the manner of selection of the electors, rather a popular vote would direct the manner of selection. In my opinion, that is unconstitutional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn't this unconstitutional in two fashions? First, it seems to be ex post facto. Second, it violates Article II, Section I, Clause 2: Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress. The legislature would not have directed the manner of selection of the electors, rather a popular vote would direct the manner of selection. In my opinion, that is unconstitutional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Little Red Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/theagitatorcom_wishful_thinking_comments/comment-page-1/#comment-24143</link>
		<dc:creator>Little Red Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7532#comment-24143</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Colorado&#039;s Amendment 36&lt;/strong&gt;
UPDATE: Outside the Beltway has an excellent piece on the disaster that this Amendment would be. Read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Colorado's Amendment 36</strong><br />
UPDATE: Outside the Beltway has an excellent piece on the disaster that this Amendment would be. Read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Southern Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/theagitatorcom_wishful_thinking_comments/comment-page-1/#comment-24141</link>
		<dc:creator>Southern Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7532#comment-24141</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;No, I&#039;m Just Browsing...&lt;/strong&gt;
 In between things, a quick look into my trusty RSS feed reader tells me that Jayson Blair is rooting for Dan Rather. Quote: &quot;Iâd give up the book royalties if I could get my credibility and career back.&quot; Jayson, unlike Dan Rather, you never had any ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>No, I'm Just Browsing...</strong><br />
 In between things, a quick look into my trusty RSS feed reader tells me that Jayson Blair is rooting for Dan Rather. Quote: "Iâd give up the book royalties if I could get my credibility and career back." Jayson, unlike Dan Rather, you never had any ...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreedomSight</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/theagitatorcom_wishful_thinking_comments/comment-page-1/#comment-24209</link>
		<dc:creator>FreedomSight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7532#comment-24209</guid>
		<description>[...] ans we could have a Bush-Edwards administration.It&#039;s something to think about.  See also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/7532&quot; &gt;Outside the Beltway&lt;/a&gt; and The Rocky Mountain News.  Katy Atkinson, of Atkinson &amp; Associates (?), [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ans we could have a Bush-Edwards administration.It's something to think about.</p>
<p> See also <a href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/7532" >Outside the Beltway</a> and The Rocky Mountain News.</p>
<p> Katy Atkinson, of Atkinson &#038; Associates (?), [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
