<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THOSE LUCKY POOR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/those_lucky_poor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/those_lucky_poor/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:05:05 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick DeMent</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/those_lucky_poor/comment-page-1/#comment-6018</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick DeMent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3298#comment-6018</guid>
		<description>One also must look at the notion that if one of the primary and legitimate functions of government is the protection of property rights, then it would be difficult to argue that ones tax liability should not have some bearing on the amount of property one owns.

This of course is a separate issue from the nothing of suffrage for non-property owners, but in an agrarian economy tying suffrage to property (meaning land) might have made sense. In a technological society the issue of what is property is far more elastic.



---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One also must look at the notion that if one of the primary and legitimate functions of government is the protection of property rights, then it would be difficult to argue that ones tax liability should not have some bearing on the amount of property one owns.</p>
<p>This of course is a separate issue from the nothing of suffrage for non-property owners, but in an agrarian economy tying suffrage to property (meaning land) might have made sense. In a technological society the issue of what is property is far more elastic.</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
