Comments on: TIME Switches To The Metric System

By: Eric J

Eric J — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:24:58 +0000

I'm really tired of Metric bashing. Anyone who works in Science, engineering, international trade, or the Military should be perfectly comfortable with metric measurement. And the Brits seem to have had no problem switching for all official measurements and maintaining traditional measurements for conversational use. (And some more archaic than ours. You'll never hear an American say he weighs 13 stone.)

By: Kent G. Budge

Kent G. Budge — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:18:41 +0000

For anything requiring actual calculation, I prefer metric.

But I have a better feel for what everyday quantities expressed in English units mean.

I'm not going to calculate the neutrino flux out of a Type II supernova in BTU per square foot per second. But I don't really know what to make of a weather forecast in degrees Celsius until I translate to Fahrenheit. Likewise the height of an NBA player in meters.

By: James Joyner

James Joyner — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:46:32 +0000

I should note, too, that the United States military has been on the metric system for decades. All the maps I used in the Army were divided into metric grids and everything from shooting ranges to targeting was done in metric.

By: hln

hln — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:37:32 +0000

The United States' major export document, the Shipper's Export Declaration and its electronic counterpart, the Automated Export System, require that US exporters report the weight of their products in kilos instead of pounds. Why shouldn't TIME do the same? I'm sure the staff there are always trying to find more ways to feel important and fully relevant.

hln

By: DC Loser

DC Loser — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:06:49 +0000

When I was in engineering school almost 30 years ago, all instruction was exclusively in metric units because as a trading nation, US companies have to adapt to the world, not the other way around. Frankly, I'm more comfortable working in metric units than the arbitrary and confusing english system. In the end, the market will dictate what we use.

By: Rick DeMent

Rick DeMent — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:36:45 +0000

But gee whiz, even the most drug addled pot dealer has figured out the metric system and can convert Oz to grams in their sleep.

By: Kent

Kent — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 03:38:00 +0000

Two predictions: They will irritate readers without really increasing enlightenment. They will take a quantity like "a pound" and convert it to "0.4536 kg" because that's what the writer's calculator says. Never mind that "half a kilogram" is probably a better translation of the precision of the original. I've had to wrestle with this at my military history web site, where I get a large number of international visitors who presumably would prefer measurements of ships and planes in metric units. There's not a really good answer.

By: candi

candi — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:18:10 +0000

Bizarre? Hardly, it's our culture, it's our heritage, it's our poetry!

Has anyone ever written songs about kilometers? (I can see for kilometers & kilometers...)

Has any man ever described himself as 25.4 centimeters uncut? To be honest, it loses something in the conversion.

And, I'm sticking with the pound cake, plain, lemon or chocolate, I'm not giving it up.

By: Chris Lawrence

Chris Lawrence — Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:59:23 +0000

Another example of Time just trying to keep up with The Economist. :)

By: Mister Biggs

Mister Biggs — Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:35:54 +0000

In Civil/Environmental Engineering we end up working in both systems ending up with mixed unit equations and fun conversion factors like 8.34 (pound-liters)/(million gallon-milligrams).

By: G.A.Phillips

G.A.Phillips — Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:35:01 +0000

Ya I remember when they made me learn that crap, I think it was just because them damn liberal teachers wanted it because they thought it sounded artsy.