<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tom Daschle Running for President?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/tom_daschle_running_for_president/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/tom_daschle_running_for_president/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:35:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Enlightened D</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/tom_daschle_running_for_president/comment-page-1/#comment-58940</link>
		<dc:creator>Enlightened D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12065#comment-58940</guid>
		<description>Dear John Cooke:  For future reference, please recall the tip from Ross on Friends that y-o-u apostrophe r-e means &quot;you are;&quot; y-o-u-r means &quot;your.&quot;  

Secondly, Tom Daschle is one of the best statesmen this country has ever seen.  He can work together but can also stand up for what he and his party believe in.  And that, my friends, is what the Democratic Party needs.  Also realize that he was running against Thune in a very high-profile presidential election year and only lost by a small margin.  (And by the way, just because he moved to Washington that doesn&#039;t mean he forgot about South Dakota.  In fact, I believe I was noticing that he talked an awful lot about the state and still seems interested in the state&#039;s issues, particularly those related to the reservations there.  Also realize that he was leading the party in the most exclusive club in the country and therefore had two very important, distinct tasks to balance.  I think he did a rather magnificent job myself.)

Last, he has incredible name ID and power within the party.  Democrats love him, and he is a wee bit (and by that, I mean A TON) smarter than Bill Owens, who is one of the potential Republican choices.  Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear John Cooke:  For future reference, please recall the tip from Ross on Friends that y-o-u apostrophe r-e means "you are;" y-o-u-r means "your."  </p>
<p>Secondly, Tom Daschle is one of the best statesmen this country has ever seen.  He can work together but can also stand up for what he and his party believe in.  And that, my friends, is what the Democratic Party needs.  Also realize that he was running against Thune in a very high-profile presidential election year and only lost by a small margin.  (And by the way, just because he moved to Washington that doesn't mean he forgot about South Dakota.  In fact, I believe I was noticing that he talked an awful lot about the state and still seems interested in the state's issues, particularly those related to the reservations there.  Also realize that he was leading the party in the most exclusive club in the country and therefore had two very important, distinct tasks to balance.  I think he did a rather magnificent job myself.)</p>
<p>Last, he has incredible name ID and power within the party.  Democrats love him, and he is a wee bit (and by that, I mean A TON) smarter than Bill Owens, who is one of the potential Republican choices.  Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Outpost</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/tom_daschle_running_for_president/comment-page-1/#comment-58486</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Outpost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12065#comment-58486</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A Daschle Comeback??&lt;/strong&gt;

 I&#039;m pretty sure this is just to keep his name out there...for business purposes, but we&#039;ll see....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Daschle Comeback??</strong></p>
<p> I'm pretty sure this is just to keep his name out there...for business purposes, but we'll see....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/tom_daschle_running_for_president/comment-page-1/#comment-58453</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12065#comment-58453</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;It could be president, it could be vice president, it could be something else,&quot; Hildebrand said. &quot;It could be nothing.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

My votwe would be &quot;D&quot; -- nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>"It could be president, it could be vice president, it could be something else," Hildebrand said. "It could be nothing."</p></blockquote>
<p>My votwe would be "D" -- nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moe Lane</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/tom_daschle_running_for_president/comment-page-1/#comment-58446</link>
		<dc:creator>Moe Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12065#comment-58446</guid>
		<description>And before anyone asks, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Traficant&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; is what I&#039;d personally consider to be &#039;bad hair&#039;.  You look at it too long and you&#039;ll swear that it moves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And before anyone asks, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Traficant" rel="nofollow">this</a> is what I'd personally consider to be 'bad hair'.  You look at it too long and you'll swear that it moves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moe Lane</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/tom_daschle_running_for_president/comment-page-1/#comment-58445</link>
		<dc:creator>Moe Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12065#comment-58445</guid>
		<description>&quot;Worked for W.&quot;

What on earth are you talking about?  From what I can tell, Cheney went right from the House to a Cabinet post: Wyoming was and is a safe GOP state, VP or no; and &#039;bad hair&#039;... OK, if Daschle&#039;s hair qualifies as &#039;bad&#039;, I guess that so does Cheney&#039;s.

Still.  Reflexive, much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Worked for W."</p>
<p>What on earth are you talking about?  From what I can tell, Cheney went right from the House to a Cabinet post: Wyoming was and is a safe GOP state, VP or no; and 'bad hair'... OK, if Daschle's hair qualifies as 'bad', I guess that so does Cheney's.</p>
<p>Still.  Reflexive, much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/tom_daschle_running_for_president/comment-page-1/#comment-58410</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 01:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12065#comment-58410</guid>
		<description>&gt;And the rationale for putting a defeated has-&gt;been with bad hair and three electoral votes in &gt;the second spot eludes me.

Worked for W.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;And the rationale for putting a defeated has-&gt;been with bad hair and three electoral votes in &gt;the second spot eludes me.</p>
<p>Worked for W.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john cooke</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/tom_daschle_running_for_president/comment-page-1/#comment-58404</link>
		<dc:creator>john cooke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12065#comment-58404</guid>
		<description>Hey Tom:  Hang it up, your a loser and you should know it.  Of course if you want to piss away all the money the poor people sent for your reelection, thats ok!  As usual you politicians know how to get rid of our money instead of returning it.  Thanks a lot, just goes to show what a true human being you are, never again will I give money to you scum!  

                   john cooke
                   glendale, mo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tom:  Hang it up, your a loser and you should know it.  Of course if you want to piss away all the money the poor people sent for your reelection, thats ok!  As usual you politicians know how to get rid of our money instead of returning it.  Thanks a lot, just goes to show what a true human being you are, never again will I give money to you scum!  </p>
<p>                   john cooke<br />
                   glendale, mo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Baron &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Food for Thought&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/tom_daschle_running_for_president/comment-page-1/#comment-58388</link>
		<dc:creator>The Baron &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Food for Thought&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12065#comment-58388</guid>
		<description>[...] OTB chews on a prospective Daschle run at the White House by keenly noting:  I can&#8217;t imagine Daschle even carrying South Dakota, let alone beating out Hillary Clinton and others for the nomination. And the rationale for putting a defeated has-been with bad hair and three electoral votes in the second spot eludes me.   Posted at 4:39 pm by Baron - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OTB chews on a prospective Daschle run at the White House by keenly noting:  I can&#8217;t imagine Daschle even carrying South Dakota, let alone beating out Hillary Clinton and others for the nomination. And the rationale for putting a defeated has-been with bad hair and three electoral votes in the second spot eludes me.   Posted at 4:39 pm by Baron - [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
