Too Much Security
 |
James Joyner | Thursday, August 9, 2007 |
Measures taken to ourselves from risks often cause more harm than the risks themselves.
When does too much security become, well, too much? According to Steve Riley, senior security strategist at Microsoft, it becomes too much when the cost of mitigating the risk outweighs the cost of that which you are trying to protect.
[...]
Steve applied this same train of logic to other, more worldly scenarios. Child kidnapping for example – apparently American parents are paranoid about kidnapping, and so forbid their children to talk to strangers. The result, according to Steve, is a generation which can’t ask for help when the only source of help is a stranger, and a general and unacceptable reduction in human interaction which is the basis of any civilised society. He prefers to tell his own kids that “…most adults are kind and honest and will help you if you need helping. But no adult needs your help to find their dog.” Teach them to recognise the attacks, rather than react negatively to an imagined fear.
And this goes all the way up to the US’s so-called “War on Terror”. According to Steve, are any of us really made safer by taking our shoes off to go through metal detectors? Surely X-ray scanners which can see right through people’s clothing is an unacceptable breach of privacy? At the very least, do we want to live in a society where this is the accepted norm?
James Fallows cites “the recent impossible legislative requirement that every single shipping container entering the United States be scanned before it leaves a foreign port” as another example of “the unthinking attempt to remove all possible security threats [which] often destroys the efficiency, value, and integrity of the thing you are trying to ‘protect.’”
This is hardly a novel concept; it’s Economics 101, really. Still, it’s often forgotten.
UPDATE: Jonathan Last points to another example: a treatment for Restless Leg Syndrome with side effects seemingly far worse than the disease itself. My parents, who don’t fast forward through commercials via the magic of TiVo, were chuckling over that one during our recent visit.
About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.
Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
- None Found
- Obama “Keeping An Eye” On Robots
- Phil Carter Quits Administration
- Census Worker Hanging Suicide, Not Right Wing Murder
- Swine flu is more popular than Dodd
- Paradox of Choice Paradoxically Untrue
- Private Forecasters Support Claim That Stimulus Worked
- Entertaining Kids During the Holidays
- How Much Will Escalation Cost?
- No Party of No
- Thought of the Day
The institutional preference for mindless application of "zero tolerance" policies instead of common sense and intelligent interpretation of flexible, intelligent rules is insidious and endemic in America, and probably other places too...
Comments are Closed
