working

POPULAR TAGS

 Outside the Beltway 

Top U.S. High Schools

Newsweek ranks the Top 1500 U.S. high schools by a rather odd formula “the number of Advanced Placement, Intl. Baccalaureate and/or Cambridge tests taken by all students at a school in 2008 divided by the number of graduating seniors.”  Aside from taking of tests — and not, say, scores on said tests — is the sole criteria strikes me as more than a tad strange.  Betsy Newmark and Dan Brown agree, with the latter especially agitated on the matter.  Jay Matthews, who devised the measure, defends it.

Another thing strikes me as odd from a quick look at the rankings:

It’s dominated by schools in Red states.  Dallas holds down the top two spots, followed by a school in the Birmingham suburbs.  Only two schools in traditional Blue states make the top 10 — at numbers 8 and 10.

Do Red states have more magnet schools, which siphon off the best students?  Are they more likely to push taking these particular tests?  Or is it just an anomaly of some sort?

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack

 
Comments
 

The two matches stand out: Dallas at 1 and 2; Jacksonville at 4 and 6

I suspect the schools are competing with each other on what Dan Brown identifies as easily manipulatable ranking system.

Posted by PD Shaw | June 9, 2009 | 05:42 pm | Permalink
 

It’s dominated by schools in Red states.

When you use "Red State," I am assuming you are referring to how the state voted in the national election.

So, I'm not sure how you define "dominated" since "red state" schools don't even constitute a majority of the list.

Furthermore, to suggest that the state political behavior has any explanatory power over local school performance is silly. You might as well argue that students perform better in warmer weather since the list is dominated by schools in warmer climates.

If you took a more appropriate geography--say, the municipality--you would see that the list is actually dominated by schools in "Blue" cities and counties.

Obama won Dallas County with 57% of the vote; he beat McCain in Tucson by 52%; Palm Beach County, he won by 67%; San Diego County by 54%, etc....

Posted by Triumph | June 9, 2009 | 06:13 pm | Permalink
 

Too bad the list didn't include private schools.

Posted by MstrB | June 9, 2009 | 08:07 pm | Permalink
 

Triumph, where do you think the parents of the students in these schools stand on school choice?

Posted by PD Shaw | June 9, 2009 | 08:24 pm | Permalink
 

Looking at the methodology, it looks more like a measure of affluence.

Steve

Posted by steve | June 9, 2009 | 09:50 pm | Permalink
 

Or is it just an anomaly of some sort?

It's an anomaly. Don't infer from this that Dallas has good schools. It doesn't.

Posted by Pug | June 9, 2009 | 10:07 pm | Permalink
 

High scores are often a function of exclusion. Give me 100 kids -- any 100 -- but let me exclude 60 by my choice. I'll show you great scores.

It's one of the ways Europe and Asia always seem to outperform us. They often have a less small "d" democratic approach, less inclusive.

The G and T schools obviously outperform by excluding all average and below average students. Student bodies in very wealthy areas may outperform. Other anomalies apply. My kids used to attend a school where virtually the entire student body were children of Duke and UNC faculty.

The ratings are to be taken with a large pinch of salt.

Posted by Michael Reynolds | June 9, 2009 | 11:30 pm | Permalink
 

Michael, you think the kids at the "Talented and Gifted" school are not a random selection? Isn't a possible that the school at the bottom of the list, Sisters of Mercy Housing for Unwanted Boys might be at the top of the list with a more affirming name? Me neither.

Posted by PD Shaw | June 10, 2009 | 10:10 am | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

 
Post a Comment

(required)

(required)


Please use the "LINK" button atop the comment box or otherwise insert HTML tags around links to other pages rather than just pasting in a URL. Doing the latter reformats the page if the URL is long, since it will not break.

 
Search OTB
Lijit Logo
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner

For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

FOLLOW US

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

MANzine logo

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2009 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.