<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top U.S. High Schools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/top_us_high_schools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/top_us_high_schools/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:20:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PD Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/top_us_high_schools/comment-page-1/#comment-1060253</link>
		<dc:creator>PD Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37510#comment-1060253</guid>
		<description>Michael, you think the kids at the &quot;Talented and Gifted&quot; school are not a random selection?  Isn&#039;t a possible that the school at the bottom of the list, Sisters of Mercy Housing for Unwanted Boys might be at the top of the list with a more affirming name?  Me neither.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, you think the kids at the "Talented and Gifted" school are not a random selection?  Isn't a possible that the school at the bottom of the list, Sisters of Mercy Housing for Unwanted Boys might be at the top of the list with a more affirming name?  Me neither.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/top_us_high_schools/comment-page-1/#comment-1059963</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37510#comment-1059963</guid>
		<description>High scores are often a function of exclusion.  Give me 100 kids -- any 100 -- but let me exclude 60 by my choice.  I&#039;ll show you great scores.

It&#039;s one of the ways Europe and Asia always seem to outperform us.   They often have a less small &quot;d&quot; democratic approach, less inclusive.

The G and T schools obviously outperform by excluding all average and below average students.  Student bodies in very wealthy areas may outperform.  Other anomalies apply.  My kids used to attend a school where virtually the entire student body were children of Duke and UNC faculty.   

The ratings are to be taken with a large pinch of salt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High scores are often a function of exclusion.  Give me 100 kids -- any 100 -- but let me exclude 60 by my choice.  I'll show you great scores.</p>
<p>It's one of the ways Europe and Asia always seem to outperform us.   They often have a less small "d" democratic approach, less inclusive.</p>
<p>The G and T schools obviously outperform by excluding all average and below average students.  Student bodies in very wealthy areas may outperform.  Other anomalies apply.  My kids used to attend a school where virtually the entire student body were children of Duke and UNC faculty.   </p>
<p>The ratings are to be taken with a large pinch of salt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pug</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/top_us_high_schools/comment-page-1/#comment-1059944</link>
		<dc:creator>Pug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37510#comment-1059944</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Or is it just an anomaly of some sort?&lt;/em&gt;

It&#039;s an anomaly. Don&#039;t infer from this that Dallas has good schools.  It doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Or is it just an anomaly of some sort?</em></p>
<p>It's an anomaly. Don't infer from this that Dallas has good schools.  It doesn't.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/top_us_high_schools/comment-page-1/#comment-1059937</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37510#comment-1059937</guid>
		<description>Looking at the methodology, it looks more like a measure of affluence. 

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the methodology, it looks more like a measure of affluence. </p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PD Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/top_us_high_schools/comment-page-1/#comment-1059897</link>
		<dc:creator>PD Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37510#comment-1059897</guid>
		<description>Triumph, where do you think the parents of the students in these schools stand on school choice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Triumph, where do you think the parents of the students in these schools stand on school choice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MstrB</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/top_us_high_schools/comment-page-1/#comment-1059889</link>
		<dc:creator>MstrB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37510#comment-1059889</guid>
		<description>Too bad the list didn&#039;t include private schools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad the list didn't include private schools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triumph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/top_us_high_schools/comment-page-1/#comment-1059765</link>
		<dc:creator>Triumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37510#comment-1059765</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s dominated by schools in Red states. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

When you use &quot;Red State,&quot; I am assuming you are referring to how the state voted in the national election.

So, I&#039;m not sure how you define &quot;dominated&quot; since &quot;red state&quot; schools don&#039;t even constitute a majority of the list.  

Furthermore, to suggest that the state political behavior has any explanatory power over local school performance is silly.  You might as well argue that students perform better in warmer weather since the list is dominated by schools in warmer climates.

If you took a more appropriate geography--say, the municipality--you would see that the list is actually dominated by schools in &quot;Blue&quot; cities and counties.  

Obama won Dallas County with 57% of the vote; he beat McCain in Tucson by 52%; Palm Beach County, he won by 67%; San Diego County by 54%, etc....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It&rsquo;s dominated by schools in Red states. </p></blockquote>
<p>When you use "Red State," I am assuming you are referring to how the state voted in the national election.</p>
<p>So, I'm not sure how you define "dominated" since "red state" schools don't even constitute a majority of the list.  </p>
<p>Furthermore, to suggest that the state political behavior has any explanatory power over local school performance is silly.  You might as well argue that students perform better in warmer weather since the list is dominated by schools in warmer climates.</p>
<p>If you took a more appropriate geography--say, the municipality--you would see that the list is actually dominated by schools in "Blue" cities and counties.  </p>
<p>Obama won Dallas County with 57% of the vote; he beat McCain in Tucson by 52%; Palm Beach County, he won by 67%; San Diego County by 54%, etc....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PD Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/top_us_high_schools/comment-page-1/#comment-1059737</link>
		<dc:creator>PD Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37510#comment-1059737</guid>
		<description>The two matches stand out:  Dallas at 1 and 2; Jacksonville at 4 and 6

I suspect the schools are competing with each other on what Dan Brown identifies as easily manipulatable ranking system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The two matches stand out:  Dallas at 1 and 2; Jacksonville at 4 and 6</p>
<p>I suspect the schools are competing with each other on what Dan Brown identifies as easily manipulatable ranking system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
