<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toyota Posts First Loss Since 1950</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/toyota_posts_first_loss_since_1950/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/toyota_posts_first_loss_since_1950/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:28:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Verdon</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/toyota_posts_first_loss_since_1950/comment-page-1/#comment-1043682</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Verdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 23:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=35963#comment-1043682</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;GM posted a $6 billion dollar quarterly loss. Toyota just lost $7.7 billion for the quarter..ats allz i&#039;m sayin&#039;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Try &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hoovers.com/free/co/secdoc.xhtml?ID=41889&amp;ipage=6589438-14162-199994&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

For the year the total losses for Toyota is down about $4.4 Billion.  For the fourth Quarter the losses for Toyota were $7.7 billion.  The fourth quarter losses are partially offset by profits from the first part of the year.

Based on &lt;a href=&quot;http://biz.yahoo.com/e/090305/gm10-k.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;General Motors last 10k&lt;/a&gt; they appear to have lost $30.9 billion in 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>GM posted a $6 billion dollar quarterly loss. Toyota just lost $7.7 billion for the quarter..ats allz i'm sayin'.</p></blockquote>
<p>Try <a href="http://www.hoovers.com/free/co/secdoc.xhtml?ID=41889&#038;ipage=6589438-14162-199994" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
<p>For the year the total losses for Toyota is down about $4.4 Billion.  For the fourth Quarter the losses for Toyota were $7.7 billion.  The fourth quarter losses are partially offset by profits from the first part of the year.</p>
<p>Based on <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/e/090305/gm10-k.html" rel="nofollow">General Motors last 10k</a> they appear to have lost $30.9 billion in 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PD Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/toyota_posts_first_loss_since_1950/comment-page-1/#comment-1043654</link>
		<dc:creator>PD Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 22:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=35963#comment-1043654</guid>
		<description>I confess that I&#039;m a little confused about the numbers, which googling around comes up with different figures ($6.9 billion quarterly loss for Toyota?)

But my main point was that G.M. had a revenue stream of $13.4 billion in TARP money.  If Toyota had that kind of revenue, it would have kicked G.M.&#039;s behind.  It&#039;s not intended to be a politically loaded observation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I confess that I'm a little confused about the numbers, which googling around comes up with different figures ($6.9 billion quarterly loss for Toyota?)</p>
<p>But my main point was that G.M. had a revenue stream of $13.4 billion in TARP money.  If Toyota had that kind of revenue, it would have kicked G.M.'s behind.  It's not intended to be a politically loaded observation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markm</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/toyota_posts_first_loss_since_1950/comment-page-1/#comment-1043625</link>
		<dc:creator>markm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 21:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=35963#comment-1043625</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;markm, I&#039;m not sure which &quot;near bankrupt dinosaur manufacturer&quot; you refer, but G.M. reported a $5.9 billion loss in the first quarter&lt;/blockquote&gt;

GM posted a $6 billion dollar quarterly loss. Toyota just lost $7.7 billion for the quarter..ats allz i&#039;m sayin&#039;.

Now, I know GM took bailout money but I am not clear how that factors in. Is the $6 billion quarterly loss for GM really $19.4 billion then?. If so, I didn&#039;t know that and stand corrected (and why is it not reported that way). 

While on the subject...the banks that were on their death bed that recieved Fed funds then a couple of months later reported profits...was that the same thing?. Was the profits they showed nothing but the bailout money hitting the books?.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>markm, I'm not sure which "near bankrupt dinosaur manufacturer" you refer, but G.M. reported a $5.9 billion loss in the first quarter</p></blockquote>
<p>GM posted a $6 billion dollar quarterly loss. Toyota just lost $7.7 billion for the quarter..ats allz i'm sayin'.</p>
<p>Now, I know GM took bailout money but I am not clear how that factors in. Is the $6 billion quarterly loss for GM really $19.4 billion then?. If so, I didn't know that and stand corrected (and why is it not reported that way). </p>
<p>While on the subject...the banks that were on their death bed that recieved Fed funds then a couple of months later reported profits...was that the same thing?. Was the profits they showed nothing but the bailout money hitting the books?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Verdon</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/toyota_posts_first_loss_since_1950/comment-page-1/#comment-1043586</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Verdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 20:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=35963#comment-1043586</guid>
		<description>Drew,

I don&#039;t know about the steel industry.  I&#039;m an economist, hence I tend to look at the economy more than individual businesses.  That said, I&#039;d look at world wide production and steel production and imports in the U.S.  If that number starts going up that might be a good thing, assuming the leading indicator assumption is true.

Mark,

I believe that $4.4 billion is its annual losses not quarterly.  This article indicates that Ford lost $14.8 billion annually and that is the better of the &quot;Big Three&quot;.  This article indicates GM lost $6 billion in the last quarter which fits nicely with PD Shaw&#039;s number.

&lt;blockquote&gt;The company&#039;s seventh-straight quarterly loss compared with a $3.3 billion net loss a year earlier and added to $82 billion in cumulative annual losses since 2004.--&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.autonews.com/article/20090507/ANA02/905079991/1231/FRONTPAGE&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Link&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Toyota is doing quite well, comparatively speaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drew,</p>
<p>I don't know about the steel industry.  I'm an economist, hence I tend to look at the economy more than individual businesses.  That said, I'd look at world wide production and steel production and imports in the U.S.  If that number starts going up that might be a good thing, assuming the leading indicator assumption is true.</p>
<p>Mark,</p>
<p>I believe that $4.4 billion is its annual losses not quarterly.  This article indicates that Ford lost $14.8 billion annually and that is the better of the "Big Three".  This article indicates GM lost $6 billion in the last quarter which fits nicely with PD Shaw's number.</p>
<blockquote><p>The company's seventh-straight quarterly loss compared with a $3.3 billion net loss a year earlier and added to $82 billion in cumulative annual losses since 2004.--<a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20090507/ANA02/905079991/1231/FRONTPAGE" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Toyota is doing quite well, comparatively speaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PD Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/toyota_posts_first_loss_since_1950/comment-page-1/#comment-1043562</link>
		<dc:creator>PD Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 19:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=35963#comment-1043562</guid>
		<description>markm, I&#039;m not sure which &quot;near bankrupt dinosaur manufacturer&quot; you refer, but G.M. reported a $5.9 billion loss in the first quarter after receiving $13.4 billion in TARP money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>markm, I'm not sure which "near bankrupt dinosaur manufacturer" you refer, but G.M. reported a $5.9 billion loss in the first quarter after receiving $13.4 billion in TARP money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/toyota_posts_first_loss_since_1950/comment-page-1/#comment-1043553</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 18:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=35963#comment-1043553</guid>
		<description>Steve -

I&#039;d be interested in your assessment of a related industry: steel, and its implications for current prospects.  As a former participant in the industry I observe that steel is the ultimate GDP product, ( a leading indicator) and that current production is at an anemic level.  A level that does not portend any meaningful economic pick up in the near term.  

The stock market appeares to have gotten ahead of itself....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve -</p>
<p>I'd be interested in your assessment of a related industry: steel, and its implications for current prospects.  As a former participant in the industry I observe that steel is the ultimate GDP product, ( a leading indicator) and that current production is at an anemic level.  A level that does not portend any meaningful economic pick up in the near term.  </p>
<p>The stock market appeares to have gotten ahead of itself....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markm</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/toyota_posts_first_loss_since_1950/comment-page-1/#comment-1043543</link>
		<dc:creator>markm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 18:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=35963#comment-1043543</guid>
		<description>So the pinnacle of manufacturing that produces the worlds highest quality cars and trucks...with no legacy costs and lower labor costs managed to lose more money than a near bankrupt dinosaur manufacturer of nothing but junk SUV&#039;s and cars nobody wants??????????????????????????.

Good for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the pinnacle of manufacturing that produces the worlds highest quality cars and trucks...with no legacy costs and lower labor costs managed to lose more money than a near bankrupt dinosaur manufacturer of nothing but junk SUV's and cars nobody wants??????????????????????????.</p>
<p>Good for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
