<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trent Lott and the Politics of Cashing In</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:10:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/comment-page-1/#comment-243255</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/11/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/#comment-243255</guid>
		<description>What do you mean &quot;now,&quot; Anjin-san?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean "now," Anjin-san?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjin-san</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/comment-page-1/#comment-243036</link>
		<dc:creator>anjin-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 04:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/11/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/#comment-243036</guid>
		<description>President before country...

Party before country...

now Pocketbook before country... 

Does this surprise anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President before country...</p>
<p>Party before country...</p>
<p>now Pocketbook before country... </p>
<p>Does this surprise anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ConservativeKicks.com</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/comment-page-1/#comment-242996</link>
		<dc:creator>ConservativeKicks.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 03:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/11/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/#comment-242996</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Trent Lott and the Politics of Cashing In ...&lt;/strong&gt;

You&#039;ve been kicked (a good thing) - Trackback from ConservativeKicks.com...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Trent Lott and the Politics of Cashing In ...</strong></p>
<p>You've been kicked (a good thing) - Trackback from ConservativeKicks.com...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/comment-page-1/#comment-242770</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/11/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/#comment-242770</guid>
		<description>Maybe he has planned to quit since before this last election, but also wanted to secure the seat for a Republican?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe he has planned to quit since before this last election, but also wanted to secure the seat for a Republican?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hines</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/comment-page-1/#comment-242623</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/11/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/#comment-242623</guid>
		<description>Re: &quot;it&#039;s more complicated than that&quot; - is it really? If we are dissatisfied with our representatives (which I think most of us are) then let&#039;s work HARD to send folks we have confidence in. The system is nothing more than the folks who sustain it. A few ideas:

1. Put all House and Senate members on the same social security system as the rest of us.
2. Put all House and Senate members out in the same health care market we all live in (this from a self employed person).
3. Put in a line item veto
4. Put in term limits...moving us back toward a common man (read &quot;common sense&quot;) approach to government...

...and I think we&#039;d have a new day.

It need not be complicated. Get involved...have some constructive ideas and work to get them implemented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: "it's more complicated than that" - is it really? If we are dissatisfied with our representatives (which I think most of us are) then let's work HARD to send folks we have confidence in. The system is nothing more than the folks who sustain it. A few ideas:</p>
<p>1. Put all House and Senate members on the same social security system as the rest of us.<br />
2. Put all House and Senate members out in the same health care market we all live in (this from a self employed person).<br />
3. Put in a line item veto<br />
4. Put in term limits...moving us back toward a common man (read "common sense") approach to government...</p>
<p>...and I think we'd have a new day.</p>
<p>It need not be complicated. Get involved...have some constructive ideas and work to get them implemented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.Wagener</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/comment-page-1/#comment-242560</link>
		<dc:creator>C.Wagener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/11/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/#comment-242560</guid>
		<description>There are two things that can be done to reduce lobbying to almost zero.  Unfortunately those two things have a near zero chance of happening.

First roll back the country to pre 1937, where courts actually cared about limits on the federal government.  Second, have an incredibly simplified tax system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two things that can be done to reduce lobbying to almost zero.  Unfortunately those two things have a near zero chance of happening.</p>
<p>First roll back the country to pre 1937, where courts actually cared about limits on the federal government.  Second, have an incredibly simplified tax system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/comment-page-1/#comment-242555</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/11/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/#comment-242555</guid>
		<description>The only angle I can come up with on the timing of the Scruggs indictment is that it certainly makes it more difficult for Mike Moore (Scruggs&#039;s collaborator on the tobacco suits &amp; settlement) to run for Lott&#039;s seat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only angle I can come up with on the timing of the Scruggs indictment is that it certainly makes it more difficult for Mike Moore (Scruggs's collaborator on the tobacco suits &amp; settlement) to run for Lott's seat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/comment-page-1/#comment-242545</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/11/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/#comment-242545</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;this is America. We are a free people. Anyone can lobby their elected representatives, or contribute money to their re-election campaigns.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s more complicated than that.  The fundamental problem is that Congress allocates hundreds of billions of dollars in a giant omnibus bill that&#039;s essentially immune to presidential vote.  The incentive system rewards sending massive amounts of pork to each District.  It also rewards those who are well organized and give large sums to the parties.

The fact that people don&#039;t vote out their own congressman for bringing home their share of the pork is hardly surprising.

Further, it&#039;s beside the point.  Getting elected doesn&#039;t render people immune from criticism during their term of office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>this is America. We are a free people. Anyone can lobby their elected representatives, or contribute money to their re-election campaigns.</p></blockquote>
<p>It's more complicated than that.  The fundamental problem is that Congress allocates hundreds of billions of dollars in a giant omnibus bill that's essentially immune to presidential vote.  The incentive system rewards sending massive amounts of pork to each District.  It also rewards those who are well organized and give large sums to the parties.</p>
<p>The fact that people don't vote out their own congressman for bringing home their share of the pork is hardly surprising.</p>
<p>Further, it's beside the point.  Getting elected doesn't render people immune from criticism during their term of office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/comment-page-1/#comment-242541</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/11/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/#comment-242541</guid>
		<description>James &amp; legion: this is America.  We are a free people.  Anyone can lobby their elected representatives, or contribute money to their re-election campaigns.  If you have a problem with that, move to China or N. Korea.  

You don&#039;t like that there is so much corruption?  Then the people that put them there can vote them out.  The fact that they don&#039;t, oh well.  We get the government we deserve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James &amp; legion: this is America.  We are a free people.  Anyone can lobby their elected representatives, or contribute money to their re-election campaigns.  If you have a problem with that, move to China or N. Korea.  </p>
<p>You don't like that there is so much corruption?  Then the people that put them there can vote them out.  The fact that they don't, oh well.  We get the government we deserve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legion</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/comment-page-1/#comment-242531</link>
		<dc:creator>legion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/11/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/#comment-242531</guid>
		<description>In addition to Dave&#039;s quite-correct comments, I don&#039;t recall seeing anything from Lott himself admitting to going into lobbying at all. The only things I&#039;ve seen come from the man himself are that &quot;it&#039;s time to move on&quot;, coupled with lots of rumors of better-or-worse credibility.

So assuming the conventional wisdom is true, it&#039;s not simply &lt;em&gt;that &lt;/em&gt;he&#039;s going into lobbying, it&#039;s that he&#039;s being rather dishonest about it - possibly criminally so if he&#039;s working on legislation that impacts the people he (presumably) already knows he&#039;s going to work for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to Dave's quite-correct comments, I don't recall seeing anything from Lott himself admitting to going into lobbying at all. The only things I've seen come from the man himself are that "it's time to move on", coupled with lots of rumors of better-or-worse credibility.</p>
<p>So assuming the conventional wisdom is true, it's not simply <em>that </em>he's going into lobbying, it's that he's being rather dishonest about it - possibly criminally so if he's working on legislation that impacts the people he (presumably) already knows he's going to work for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/comment-page-1/#comment-242498</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/11/trent_lott_and_the_politics_of_cashing_in/#comment-242498</guid>
		<description>His resignation certainly supports the idea that there are only two reasons to seek elective office:  rent-seeking and power.  When you&#039;re in the minority your power is reduced and so is your ability to exact subsidies.  For the minority there&#039;s more money in lobbying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His resignation certainly supports the idea that there are only two reasons to seek elective office:  rent-seeking and power.  When you're in the minority your power is reduced and so is your ability to exact subsidies.  For the minority there's more money in lobbying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
