<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tricks of the Polling Trade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/tricks_of_the_polling_trade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/tricks_of_the_polling_trade/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:09:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/tricks_of_the_polling_trade/comment-page-1/#comment-25494</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7762#comment-25494</guid>
		<description>Something curious happened during the last Canadian election. With the governing Liberals knee deep in the huge &quot;sponsorship scandal&quot;, polls showed the traditional support for the Libs in Ontario had softened and at one point the Conservatives were actually ahead.

Yet, when they actually voted, they returned mostly Liberals to parliament from Ontario - the suspected reason for the polling discrepency? It was thought that Liberal supporters were embarrassed to admit they were voting for the scandal ridden party. 
But when they went to the polls, they voted for them in the privacy of anonymity.

I haven&#039;t spent enough time in the US to know if the media pileon of Bush may be having a similar effect on some supporters - but I wonder....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something curious happened during the last Canadian election. With the governing Liberals knee deep in the huge "sponsorship scandal", polls showed the traditional support for the Libs in Ontario had softened and at one point the Conservatives were actually ahead.</p>
<p>Yet, when they actually voted, they returned mostly Liberals to parliament from Ontario - the suspected reason for the polling discrepency? It was thought that Liberal supporters were embarrassed to admit they were voting for the scandal ridden party.<br />
But when they went to the polls, they voted for them in the privacy of anonymity.</p>
<p>I haven't spent enough time in the US to know if the media pileon of Bush may be having a similar effect on some supporters - but I wonder....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/tricks_of_the_polling_trade/comment-page-1/#comment-25492</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7762#comment-25492</guid>
		<description>If I didn&#039;t need land line for TiVo and DirecTV, I&#039;d be in that boat, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I didn't need land line for TiVo and DirecTV, I'd be in that boat, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Knapp</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/tricks_of_the_polling_trade/comment-page-1/#comment-25491</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Knapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7762#comment-25491</guid>
		<description>I also wonder how the ubiquitous proliferation of cell phones has affected polling.  I don&#039;t have a home phone--just a cell phone.  I know lots of other people in the same boat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also wonder how the ubiquitous proliferation of cell phones has affected polling.  I don't have a home phone--just a cell phone.  I know lots of other people in the same boat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
