<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TWO RIGHT FEET</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/two_right_feet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/two_right_feet/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:36:53 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PoliBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/two_right_feet/comment-page-1/#comment-4907</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3002#comment-4907</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;OTB on Arnie&lt;/strong&gt;
James is right on the CA Republican Party&#039;s quandry over at OTB (I mean, after all, he agrees with me). The bottom line is that I simply do not subscribe to the line that it is better to be &quot;pure&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>OTB on Arnie</strong><br />
James is right on the CA Republican Party's quandry over at OTB (I mean, after all, he agrees with me). The bottom line is that I simply do not subscribe to the line that it is better to be "pure"...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PoliBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/two_right_feet/comment-page-1/#comment-4908</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3002#comment-4908</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;More on Strategic Thinking by Candidates and Voters&lt;/strong&gt;
Debate in the comments sections of several posts below (such as here ) have inspired this response: Setting aside the theoretical for a moment, the plain facts of the circumstances are this: there are only two viable candidates in the...

---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More on Strategic Thinking by Candidates and Voters</strong><br />
Debate in the comments sections of several posts below (such as here ) have inspired this response: Setting aside the theoretical for a moment, the plain facts of the circumstances are this: there are only two viable candidates in the...</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
