<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Story of the Uighar Captives at Gitmo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/uighar_captives_at_gitmo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/uighar_captives_at_gitmo/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:37:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Obama Asserts That Innocent Prisoners Have No Right of Release</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/uighar_captives_at_gitmo/comment-page-1/#comment-1053802</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Asserts That Innocent Prisoners Have No Right of Release</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 17:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=36395#comment-1053802</guid>
		<description>[...] the morally outrageous claim that the 17 Chinese Uighars who were captured by U.S. troops on the demonstrably false assertion that they were terrorists, held at Guantanamo Bay and tortured/enhancedly interrogated have no [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the morally outrageous claim that the 17 Chinese Uighars who were captured by U.S. troops on the demonstrably false assertion that they were terrorists, held at Guantanamo Bay and tortured/enhancedly interrogated have no [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Plunk</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/uighar_captives_at_gitmo/comment-page-1/#comment-1049173</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Plunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 20:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=36395#comment-1049173</guid>
		<description>Ben, 

Before you get too sickened let me explain I avoided this post because the entire topic is a tiresome attempt to discredit a policy that has no reasonable alternatives.  Alex has a bone to pick over this and that&#039;s okay but it has reached the point of incessant pounding on the table.

Our military, intelligence services, congress, and administration are all looking at these things every day.  They love to poke at each other and therefore I think we have a policy that works as well as we can expect.  The gotcha moments are not there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, </p>
<p>Before you get too sickened let me explain I avoided this post because the entire topic is a tiresome attempt to discredit a policy that has no reasonable alternatives.  Alex has a bone to pick over this and that's okay but it has reached the point of incessant pounding on the table.</p>
<p>Our military, intelligence services, congress, and administration are all looking at these things every day.  They love to poke at each other and therefore I think we have a policy that works as well as we can expect.  The gotcha moments are not there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Plunk</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/uighar_captives_at_gitmo/comment-page-1/#comment-1049171</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Plunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 20:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=36395#comment-1049171</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s throw out that FBI report.  Sure maybe the most of the Uighurs are moderates and like the United States but what about these particular ones?  Okay then, we have one blogger&#039;s opinions.  We know a review committee determined they were not enemy combatants but are they terrorists?  What interest does the United States have in detaining them?  Why were they in Afghanistan?  Sightseeing?  Cultural exchange during a war?

See that&#039;s the thing, there are too many unanswered questions to assume these are innocent players.  In the grand scheme of things we could say they are lucky to be alive after bumming around in Taliban country.

This is like a criminal trial but we are only getting the argument of the defense.  There&#039;s a whole other side of this story that the military knows and has no obligation to tell us.  Have any congressmen investigated this?  How about Mr. Hope and Change?  Wouldn&#039;t he want to fix this supposed tragedy?  I&#039;m sure there are few who would like to take something like this to the press if in fact they are innocent.

Skepticism cuts both ways when it comes to how our government operates.  I&#039;ve always found it&#039;s where interests lie that you substantiate and confirm competing stories.  There&#039;s still not enough here to make a conclusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let's throw out that FBI report.  Sure maybe the most of the Uighurs are moderates and like the United States but what about these particular ones?  Okay then, we have one blogger's opinions.  We know a review committee determined they were not enemy combatants but are they terrorists?  What interest does the United States have in detaining them?  Why were they in Afghanistan?  Sightseeing?  Cultural exchange during a war?</p>
<p>See that's the thing, there are too many unanswered questions to assume these are innocent players.  In the grand scheme of things we could say they are lucky to be alive after bumming around in Taliban country.</p>
<p>This is like a criminal trial but we are only getting the argument of the defense.  There's a whole other side of this story that the military knows and has no obligation to tell us.  Have any congressmen investigated this?  How about Mr. Hope and Change?  Wouldn't he want to fix this supposed tragedy?  I'm sure there are few who would like to take something like this to the press if in fact they are innocent.</p>
<p>Skepticism cuts both ways when it comes to how our government operates.  I've always found it's where interests lie that you substantiate and confirm competing stories.  There's still not enough here to make a conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/uighar_captives_at_gitmo/comment-page-1/#comment-1049103</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 16:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=36395#comment-1049103</guid>
		<description>Interesting that there are no comments on this story.  In the previous thread, all of the cons were shouting out for you to produce evidence of innocent men still in Gitmo.  Now you&#039;ve provided some, and they&#039;re just avoiding this post like the plague.  Sickening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that there are no comments on this story.  In the previous thread, all of the cons were shouting out for you to produce evidence of innocent men still in Gitmo.  Now you've provided some, and they're just avoiding this post like the plague.  Sickening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hilzoy And The Uighars &#171; Around The Sphere</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/uighar_captives_at_gitmo/comment-page-1/#comment-1049043</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilzoy And The Uighars &#171; Around The Sphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=36395#comment-1049043</guid>
		<description>[...] Alex Knapp on the posts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alex Knapp on the posts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
