<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UN: CHICKEN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/un_chicken/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/un_chicken/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:53:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/un_chicken/comment-page-1/#comment-9127</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4178#comment-9127</guid>
		<description>Does the UN have troops under its command that it can count on to put its personnel&#039;s security first? No? Then they&#039;d be pretty damn stupid to go in and hope for the best, wouldn&#039;t they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the UN have troops under its command that it can count on to put its personnel's security first? No? Then they'd be pretty damn stupid to go in and hope for the best, wouldn't they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/un_chicken/comment-page-1/#comment-9128</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4178#comment-9128</guid>
		<description>Danielle,

That&#039;s really the point.  The UN is a sham organization for this kind of mission--it depends on consensus, which means it&#039;s at the mercy of its most timid member. As a result, the UN can only act when action is unnecessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danielle,</p>
<p>That's really the point.  The UN is a sham organization for this kind of mission--it depends on consensus, which means it's at the mercy of its most timid member. As a result, the UN can only act when action is unnecessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/un_chicken/comment-page-1/#comment-9129</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4178#comment-9129</guid>
		<description>...which is why having people like Danielle whine the U.N. should do it is oh so moronic.



&lt;i&gt;UN is excellent for distributing humanitarian assistance&lt;/i&gt;

Ya know James. I&#039;m not even sure this is true anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>...which is why having people like Danielle whine the U.N. should do it is oh so moronic.</p>
<p><i>UN is excellent for distributing humanitarian assistance</i></p>
<p>Ya know James. I'm not even sure this is true anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/un_chicken/comment-page-1/#comment-9130</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4178#comment-9130</guid>
		<description>The UN&#039;s humanitarian agencies like UNESCO and UNICEF still do a bang-up job. I just think it&#039;s time to give up the notion that it&#039;s ever going to be some sort of world enforcer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UN's humanitarian agencies like UNESCO and UNICEF still do a bang-up job. I just think it's time to give up the notion that it's ever going to be some sort of world enforcer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technically Speaking</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/un_chicken/comment-page-1/#comment-9131</link>
		<dc:creator>Technically Speaking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4178#comment-9131</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;LOTD - Q&lt;/strong&gt;
This may be a bit queer, but I nominated my quintessence to fill in for the queen of LOTD, today. It has been 5 days since our last quarry, so I think we are nigh time. What are my qualifications, you ask? Well, the queen would want it so. So step easi...

---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>LOTD - Q</strong><br />
This may be a bit queer, but I nominated my quintessence to fill in for the queen of LOTD, today. It has been 5 days since our last quarry, so I think we are nigh time. What are my qualifications, you ask? Well, the queen would want it so. So step easi...</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
