working

POPULAR TAGS

 Outside the Beltway 

UN Finds Syria Responsible for Murder of Lebanese Prime Minister

The long-awaited United Nations report on the murder of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri found that it was orchestrated and carried out at the highest levels of the Syrian government.

Brother-In-Law of Syrian Leader Implicated (AP)

The brother-in-law of Syria’s president was implicated in the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, and Lebanese intelligence officials helped organize it, according to a U.N. inquiry that officially linked Damascus to the slaying for the first time.

The exhaustive report into the Feb. 14 car bomb that killed the popular opposition leader and 20 others stopped short of fingering Syrian President Bashar Assad or his inner circle. But it accused the regime of failing to cooperate in the inquiry and alleged Syrian Foreign Minister Farouk al-Sharaa lied in a letter to the investigating commission. It also cites one witness as saying Assad’s brother-in-law Assef Shawkat, Syria’s military intelligence chief, set up a false confession to Hariri’s murder 15 days before it took place.

That Syria is responsible was presumed from the beginning. That the UN actually had the guts to issue such a direct finding, though, was not. It is virtually impossible to find direct proof that Assad ordered the assassination. Still, it is inconceivable that his intelligence chief and brother-in-law would have acted without his approval.

Correction: Last sentence rewritten to make my meaning more clear.

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack
 
Comments
 

Those of us who generally disdain the U.N. have to be able to explain why we like it in this instance. What part of the U.N. took this action?

Posted by sammler | October 21, 2005 | 10:37 am | Permalink
 

Still, no one should doubt that his intelligence chief and brother-in-law acted without his approval.

That may be a stronger statement than you intended, or perhaps you wrote "doubt" when you meant something else.

Posted by McGehee | October 21, 2005 | 10:42 am | Permalink
 

Kevin: The sentence was too convoluted. I've rewritten it to clarify.

Posted by James Joyner | October 21, 2005 | 10:56 am | Permalink
 

Good for Bush. This is the first step in along dance that will end in cruise missles landing in Damascus for sending terrorists into Iraq.

Posted by RA | October 21, 2005 | 05:11 pm | Permalink
 

That's nice of them to recognize the truth & publicly state it (for once). Now that the UN has said Syria is guilty, what are they going to do about it?

Posted by exdem13 | October 21, 2005 | 07:07 pm | Permalink
 

I’m fed up with all these self-proclaimed Lebanon “experts” avidly commenting excerpts from the Mehlis report as if it were some kind of exercise in exegesis.

OK: some Marxist/Syrian “Mukhabarât” thugs might have contributed to the killing of one of their former proteges… and, after all, so what?

Rafiq Hariri was a notorious Saudi-sponsored fraudster and embezzler who had stolen billions from the Lebanese government’s coffers with the complicity of resident Syrian Gen. Ghazi Canaan who skimmed his infamous “khamseen” percent commission for the big boys back in Damascus and Qardâha.

Faux “sheikh” Hariri was most likely killed in a settling of accounts between rival Syrian mafia gangs: that type of crime happens every now and then in Palermo and in the south side of Chicago without eliciting the appointment of a German special prosecutor or impromptu meetings of the UN’s Security Council!

Contrary to the tall tales peddled on Fox News, Future TV, Al-Nahar-al-Wahhabist and other Saudi and/or Hebrew controlled media outlets, “sheikh Rafiq” was no “disinterested defender of freedom”

Actually, throughout the 1980s and 1990s, Saddam’s Iraq and the French government were the only members of the international community who stood squarely on the side of Lebanon’s sovereignty while the country was being ripped/raped by Syria and Saudi Arabia: in those days, the White House courageously looked the other way while Syrian generals tortured at will from Beirut to Zahleh and “sheikh” Rafiq handed no-bid government contracts to his family’s construction firms and organized Oriental orgies cum crystal waterpipes and deluxe Lebanese sex slaves for his Saudi masters.

Posted by Dr Victorino de la Vega | October 22, 2005 | 04:47 am | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
Lijit Logo
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner

For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

FOLLOW US

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

MANzine logo

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2009 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.