<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unnecessary Scandal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/unnecessary_scandal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/unnecessary_scandal/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:36:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/unnecessary_scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-117586</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/03/unnecessary_scandal/#comment-117586</guid>
		<description>This &quot;Tempest in a teacup&quot; has gone on for so long that one would start to suspect a spoon![lol]

the arguements still fail to &quot;stir&quot; any indignation in people of common sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This "Tempest in a teacup" has gone on for so long that one would start to suspect a spoon![lol]</p>
<p>the arguements still fail to "stir" any indignation in people of common sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tano</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/unnecessary_scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-117560</link>
		<dc:creator>Tano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/03/unnecessary_scandal/#comment-117560</guid>
		<description>I think you are falling down on the political analysis here.

My take on CK&#039;s piece is that he senses that Gonzales is a dead man walking, and that he probably will soon discover that existential need for spending some more time with his family.

So how should the official Republican spin on this be constructed. Certainly not that anyone was actually caught pressuring USAs to function as political hit men / party defenders. No. Lets get out the meme that Gonzo has to go because he was incompetent in his handling of a &quot;non-scandal&quot;.

There, thats an outcome we can live with. And let the lesson be learned by all. Closely manage your spin - be very very attentive to crafting your messages to Congress. Allowing someone to testify without having the talking points lined up, and driven into their skulls - thats the cardinal sin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are falling down on the political analysis here.</p>
<p>My take on CK's piece is that he senses that Gonzales is a dead man walking, and that he probably will soon discover that existential need for spending some more time with his family.</p>
<p>So how should the official Republican spin on this be constructed. Certainly not that anyone was actually caught pressuring USAs to function as political hit men / party defenders. No. Lets get out the meme that Gonzo has to go because he was incompetent in his handling of a "non-scandal".</p>
<p>There, thats an outcome we can live with. And let the lesson be learned by all. Closely manage your spin - be very very attentive to crafting your messages to Congress. Allowing someone to testify without having the talking points lined up, and driven into their skulls - thats the cardinal sin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/unnecessary_scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-117554</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/03/unnecessary_scandal/#comment-117554</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bush&#039;s second term blues...&lt;/strong&gt;

With every unfolding crisis, President Bush is finding fewer allies in his corner. Republicans are e...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bush's second term blues...</strong></p>
<p>With every unfolding crisis, President Bush is finding fewer allies in his corner. Republicans are e...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveD</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/unnecessary_scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-117549</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 18:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/03/unnecessary_scandal/#comment-117549</guid>
		<description>Mr. Matthews, I am beginning to ask myself that same question very often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Matthews, I am beginning to ask myself that same question very often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/unnecessary_scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-117545</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 18:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/03/unnecessary_scandal/#comment-117545</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s not a question of probity, but of competence. Gonzales has allowed a scandal to be created where there was none&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No.
The good Doctor should know better than most, that neither incompetence, nor actual crime is required on the part of Republicans to get the Democrats to start screaming &#039;scandal&#039;. And his  resignation and or removal would be treated as an admission of it.  Why hand the Democrats a victory without a fight? 

He&#039;s wrong about this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It&rsquo;s not a question of probity, but of competence. Gonzales has allowed a scandal to be created where there was none</p></blockquote>
<p>No.<br />
The good Doctor should know better than most, that neither incompetence, nor actual crime is required on the part of Republicans to get the Democrats to start screaming 'scandal'. And his  resignation and or removal would be treated as an admission of it.  Why hand the Democrats a victory without a fight? </p>
<p>He's wrong about this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanford Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/unnecessary_scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-117543</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanford Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 18:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/03/unnecessary_scandal/#comment-117543</guid>
		<description>Can we produce enough laws, rules and regulations to get people to do as they should without them? There has been a continuous epidemic of bad behavior that can only be solved if people around us instill honesty and integrity from our first breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we produce enough laws, rules and regulations to get people to do as they should without them? There has been a continuous epidemic of bad behavior that can only be solved if people around us instill honesty and integrity from our first breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legion</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/unnecessary_scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-117541</link>
		<dc:creator>legion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 18:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/03/unnecessary_scandal/#comment-117541</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;How could he allow his aides to go to Capitol Hill unprepared and misinformed and therefore give inaccurate and misleading testimony?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I thnk that&#039;s the key. Krauthammer assumes this, when the emails &amp; other documents hint (and I predict the &#039;missing gap&#039; material will prove) that the DOJ folks weren&#039;t &#039;unprepared&#039;; they went there with the express intent of lying to cover up the politicizing of the USAs and the deliberate disruption of Dem candidates and ongoing investigations of GOP members and friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>How could he allow his aides to go to Capitol Hill unprepared and misinformed and therefore give inaccurate and misleading testimony?</p></blockquote>
<p>I thnk that's the key. Krauthammer assumes this, when the emails &amp; other documents hint (and I predict the 'missing gap' material will prove) that the DOJ folks weren't 'unprepared'; they went there with the express intent of lying to cover up the politicizing of the USAs and the deliberate disruption of Dem candidates and ongoing investigations of GOP members and friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
