<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UPN Cancels Star Trek: Enterprise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/upn_cancels_star_trek_enterprise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/upn_cancels_star_trek_enterprise/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:10:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DAVID D.</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/upn_cancels_star_trek_enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-37297</link>
		<dc:creator>DAVID D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9088#comment-37297</guid>
		<description>DAVID. I BEN WATHING STAR TREK FROM THE ORIGANAL SEIRIE RERUNS TO THE TNG,DS9,VOYAGER. AND I LIKE THE REAL SCIENCE AND THARES NO RACE PROBLOM AND EVERYONE GETS ALONG WITH EVERYONE. DAVID D. LIVE LONG AND PROSPER.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DAVID. I BEN WATHING STAR TREK FROM THE ORIGANAL SEIRIE RERUNS TO THE TNG,DS9,VOYAGER. AND I LIKE THE REAL SCIENCE AND THARES NO RACE PROBLOM AND EVERYONE GETS ALONG WITH EVERYONE. DAVID D. LIVE LONG AND PROSPER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diggers Realm</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/upn_cancels_star_trek_enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-35634</link>
		<dc:creator>Diggers Realm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 13:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9088#comment-35634</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Star Trek: Enterprise Cancelled; My Favorites From Star Trek&lt;/strong&gt;
I watched the pilot episode of Star Trek: Enterprise and I think that is the only episode I have watched. I quickly was bored with it as I have been with every Star Trek series since Star Trek: The Next...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Star Trek: Enterprise Cancelled; My Favorites From Star Trek</strong><br />
I watched the pilot episode of Star Trek: Enterprise and I think that is the only episode I have watched. I quickly was bored with it as I have been with every Star Trek series since Star Trek: The Next...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N.E. Republican</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/upn_cancels_star_trek_enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-35492</link>
		<dc:creator>N.E. Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2005 17:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9088#comment-35492</guid>
		<description>Anyone interested in trying to save Enterprise can go to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saveenterprise.com&quot;&gt;http://www.saveenterprise.com&lt;/a&gt;  for information on a letter writing campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone interested in trying to save Enterprise can go to <a href="http://www.saveenterprise.com">http://www.saveenterprise.com</a>  for information on a letter writing campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Pierce</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/upn_cancels_star_trek_enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-35314</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9088#comment-35314</guid>
		<description>UPN deliberately put it opposite SG-1 on the biggest night of scifi TV in history. They wanted bad enough ratings to justify canceling it. I can&#039;t think of any other reason why they would have left it in a time slot that they knew 6 months in advance would conflict with the #1 watched scifi show ever.

I thought Voyager improved considerably toward the end of the third season and especially in the 4th-6th seasons. There was about half a season in the 6th or 7th season that just sucked, but I thought the end run was great, besides the finale. It didn&#039;t hold a candle to DS9 and couldn&#039;t come close to competing wiht Stargate or B5, but it was better than most scifi TV.

I didn&#039;t see much in Enterprise that was political except one episode about a mind-melding disease intended to remind people of the stigma of AIDS, the endorsement of pre-emptive self-defense inherent in the Xindi arc, and then what seemed to be a few anti-Bush jabs from the new writers in one arc this year that turned out really to be very different in the context that the Romulans were behind the whole thing. Most of the questioned they raised, even in those episodes, weren&#039;t directly related to any political scenario in the real world but rather just raised complex questions in the way B5 did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPN deliberately put it opposite SG-1 on the biggest night of scifi TV in history. They wanted bad enough ratings to justify canceling it. I can't think of any other reason why they would have left it in a time slot that they knew 6 months in advance would conflict with the #1 watched scifi show ever.</p>
<p>I thought Voyager improved considerably toward the end of the third season and especially in the 4th-6th seasons. There was about half a season in the 6th or 7th season that just sucked, but I thought the end run was great, besides the finale. It didn't hold a candle to DS9 and couldn't come close to competing wiht Stargate or B5, but it was better than most scifi TV.</p>
<p>I didn't see much in Enterprise that was political except one episode about a mind-melding disease intended to remind people of the stigma of AIDS, the endorsement of pre-emptive self-defense inherent in the Xindi arc, and then what seemed to be a few anti-Bush jabs from the new writers in one arc this year that turned out really to be very different in the context that the Romulans were behind the whole thing. Most of the questioned they raised, even in those episodes, weren't directly related to any political scenario in the real world but rather just raised complex questions in the way B5 did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dougrc</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/upn_cancels_star_trek_enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-35250</link>
		<dc:creator>dougrc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 16:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9088#comment-35250</guid>
		<description>I really enjoyed the first season, but the show never really justified it&#039;s use of alien species that never had been mentioned in the historically later shows. If nothing else, we&#039;ve learned from the other Star Trek sagas is that old enemies never go away, they just keep coming back in more interesting ways. New enemies in an earlier timeline just never made any sense.

Their biggest hope to increase their viewership was to move from Wednesday night, so that part of the decision was correct. Unfortunately they picked wrongly, choosing the night of the week that Sci-Fi channel had already decided was going to be &quot;original series&quot; night. 1 Star Trek vs. 2 Star Gates and 1 Andromeda was a losing proposition; and then along comes Battlestar Gallactica. The writing was on the wall; there would be no audience. &#039;Tis a pity!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed the first season, but the show never really justified it's use of alien species that never had been mentioned in the historically later shows. If nothing else, we've learned from the other Star Trek sagas is that old enemies never go away, they just keep coming back in more interesting ways. New enemies in an earlier timeline just never made any sense.</p>
<p>Their biggest hope to increase their viewership was to move from Wednesday night, so that part of the decision was correct. Unfortunately they picked wrongly, choosing the night of the week that Sci-Fi channel had already decided was going to be "original series" night. 1 Star Trek vs. 2 Star Gates and 1 Andromeda was a losing proposition; and then along comes Battlestar Gallactica. The writing was on the wall; there would be no audience. 'Tis a pity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/upn_cancels_star_trek_enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-35183</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 12:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9088#comment-35183</guid>
		<description>Hey, I watched every single episode of Voyager, and enjoyed it thoroughly.

I think the thing that killed Enterprise is when they started inserting political ideology into it. They got away with making TNG a socialist propaganda machine, but the demographics have changed.

I think for the most part Rick Berman and Brandon Braga have done a commendable job. My kids and I were 4 of that 2.5 million that watched Friday&#039;s episode. I&#039;ll be sad to see it go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I watched every single episode of Voyager, and enjoyed it thoroughly.</p>
<p>I think the thing that killed Enterprise is when they started inserting political ideology into it. They got away with making TNG a socialist propaganda machine, but the demographics have changed.</p>
<p>I think for the most part Rick Berman and Brandon Braga have done a commendable job. My kids and I were 4 of that 2.5 million that watched Friday's episode. I'll be sad to see it go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan's Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/upn_cancels_star_trek_enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-35140</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan's Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 02:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9088#comment-35140</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;UPN. Your agonizer, please.&lt;/strong&gt;
It&#039;s official: STAR TREK: ENTERPRISE Cancelled That&#039;s very unfortunate. Star Trek series typically need a couple seasons to stabilize and find an audience. TNG and DS9, for example, were excellent, but the early seasons of both were not particularly ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>UPN. Your agonizer, please.</strong><br />
It's official: STAR TREK: ENTERPRISE Cancelled That's very unfortunate. Star Trek series typically need a couple seasons to stabilize and find an audience. TNG and DS9, for example, were excellent, but the early seasons of both were not particularly ...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Solo</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/upn_cancels_star_trek_enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-35127</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Solo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 01:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9088#comment-35127</guid>
		<description>Ironically, I saw and reasonably liked mainly the later episodes of Voyager.

But right from the start of Voyager they lost a lot of people with that voice.

DS9 seems to get an awful lot of praise, but I mostly couldn&#039;t stand it.  Booooring.  To &quot;trek&quot; one does not stay in one place.

Enterprise had captured closest to the flavor of the original series, gained adventure that DS9 lacked IMHO, lost some of the mushy political correctness/socialist/bureaucratic edge of Next Generation, and finally gotten excellent this season with the advent of some better writers and the stories we though we were watching for about the pre-Federation days and how the Federation came to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically, I saw and reasonably liked mainly the later episodes of Voyager.</p>
<p>But right from the start of Voyager they lost a lot of people with that voice.</p>
<p>DS9 seems to get an awful lot of praise, but I mostly couldn't stand it.  Booooring.  To "trek" one does not stay in one place.</p>
<p>Enterprise had captured closest to the flavor of the original series, gained adventure that DS9 lacked IMHO, lost some of the mushy political correctness/socialist/bureaucratic edge of Next Generation, and finally gotten excellent this season with the advent of some better writers and the stories we though we were watching for about the pre-Federation days and how the Federation came to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RPD1</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/upn_cancels_star_trek_enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-35125</link>
		<dc:creator>RPD1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 01:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9088#comment-35125</guid>
		<description>Too bad.  They kept moving the schedule around and I couldn&#039;t keep track to watch.

DARN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad.  They kept moving the schedule around and I couldn't keep track to watch.</p>
<p>DARN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Signifying Nothing</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/upn_cancels_star_trek_enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-35123</link>
		<dc:creator>Signifying Nothing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 00:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9088#comment-35123</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Enterprise canned&lt;/strong&gt;
The writing on the wall was there for some time, but now it&#039;s official; Star Trek: Enterprise will come to an end after four seasons on UPN. Although I have to say that (at least creatively) Enterprise was on the...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Enterprise canned</strong><br />
The writing on the wall was there for some time, but now it's official; Star Trek: Enterprise will come to an end after four seasons on UPN. Although I have to say that (at least creatively) Enterprise was on the...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Director Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/upn_cancels_star_trek_enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-35122</link>
		<dc:creator>Director Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 00:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9088#comment-35122</guid>
		<description>Kind of a shame as I thought the series was FINALLY finding itself.  I really disliked the first few years, but this year - except for the season opener - has been pretty good.

Oh well, there&#039;s now another reason to start watching the Battlestar Galactica series - besides the fact it&#039;s really good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kind of a shame as I thought the series was FINALLY finding itself.  I really disliked the first few years, but this year - except for the season opener - has been pretty good.</p>
<p>Oh well, there's now another reason to start watching the Battlestar Galactica series - besides the fact it's really good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By:  » Gone Hollywood</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/upn_cancels_star_trek_enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-127496</link>
		<dc:creator> » Gone Hollywood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9088#comment-127496</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;George Takei, Star Trekâs Sulu, Discloses Homosexuality  James Doohan, Star Trek Star and D-Day Vet, Dies at 85  Card: Star Trek Was Bad Science Fiction  âStar Trekâ Bit Players Cling On  How to Save Star Trek  UPN Cancels Star Trek: Enterprise  Jolene Blalock Playboy Interview  Better Than Star Trek  &lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->George Takei, Star Trekâs Sulu, Discloses Homosexuality  James Doohan, Star Trek Star and D-Day Vet, Dies at 85  Card: Star Trek Was Bad Science Fiction  âStar Trekâ Bit Players Cling On  How to Save Star Trek  UPN Cancels Star Trek: Enterprise  Jolene Blalock Playboy Interview  Better Than Star Trek  <!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
