<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. Hints at Penalties for Syria</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_hints_at_penalties_for_syria/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_hints_at_penalties_for_syria/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:23:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_hints_at_penalties_for_syria/comment-page-1/#comment-36569</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9261#comment-36569</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; A vote for bush is a vote for osama&lt;/i&gt;

Now there&#039;s a new high in witty repartee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> A vote for bush is a vote for osama</i></p>
<p>Now there's a new high in witty repartee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lt Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_hints_at_penalties_for_syria/comment-page-1/#comment-36557</link>
		<dc:creator>Lt Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9261#comment-36557</guid>
		<description>A vote for bush is a vote for osama</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A vote for bush is a vote for osama</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LJD</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_hints_at_penalties_for_syria/comment-page-1/#comment-36555</link>
		<dc:creator>LJD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9261#comment-36555</guid>
		<description>&quot;That a longstanding, bipartisan, international consensus existed that Saddam&#039;s regime was building WMD and supporting Islamic terrorists notwithstanding, the &quot;Bush lied to get us into war&quot; meme persists.&quot;

What will be the leftward criticism of action in Syria, should it become necessary?  There&#039;s no proof that Syria is tied to terror?  No war for dates?  The Lebanese aren&#039;t really all that bad off?

Ironically, turning up the heat on Syria may yet uncover those elusive WMDs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"That a longstanding, bipartisan, international consensus existed that Saddam's regime was building WMD and supporting Islamic terrorists notwithstanding, the "Bush lied to get us into war" meme persists."</p>
<p>What will be the leftward criticism of action in Syria, should it become necessary?  There's no proof that Syria is tied to terror?  No war for dates?  The Lebanese aren't really all that bad off?</p>
<p>Ironically, turning up the heat on Syria may yet uncover those elusive WMDs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
