<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. Poverty Rate Down Significantly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_poverty_rate_down_significantly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_poverty_rate_down_significantly/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:37:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_poverty_rate_down_significantly/comment-page-1/#comment-144902</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/us_poverty_rate_down_significantly/#comment-144902</guid>
		<description>So let me get this straight, Verdon&#039;s post title says &lt;em&gt;U.S. Poverty Rate Down Significantly&lt;/em&gt;, but he has to correct his post to note that it only fell by a statistically insignificant 0.3% and doesn&#039;t even update the post title?

Yes, what a fine economist you make Steve.

Yi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So let me get this straight, Verdon's post title says <em>U.S. Poverty Rate Down Significantly</em>, but he has to correct his post to note that it only fell by a statistically insignificant 0.3% and doesn't even update the post title?</p>
<p>Yes, what a fine economist you make Steve.</p>
<p>Yi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spencer</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_poverty_rate_down_significantly/comment-page-1/#comment-144809</link>
		<dc:creator>spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 20:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/us_poverty_rate_down_significantly/#comment-144809</guid>
		<description>Steve I&#039;m sure that someone with your background is well aware that when the Census Bureau uses the term statistically insignificant they are using it in its exact mathematical meaning.

Do you really believe it is being completely honest  to pretend not to know this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve I'm sure that someone with your background is well aware that when the Census Bureau uses the term statistically insignificant they are using it in its exact mathematical meaning.</p>
<p>Do you really believe it is being completely honest  to pretend not to know this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madmatt</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_poverty_rate_down_significantly/comment-page-1/#comment-144559</link>
		<dc:creator>madmatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/us_poverty_rate_down_significantly/#comment-144559</guid>
		<description>See what 6 years of republican control gets you...more poor and uninsured people...I see a new bumber sticker!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See what 6 years of republican control gets you...more poor and uninsured people...I see a new bumber sticker!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Worstall</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_poverty_rate_down_significantly/comment-page-1/#comment-144544</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Worstall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/us_poverty_rate_down_significantly/#comment-144544</guid>
		<description>More importantly Dave, is that what is being measured is the number in poverty &quot;before&quot; any help they receive from the Govt. It does not include the effects of the EITC, of housing, of food stamps: it only includes direct cash transfers.

It&#039;s a terrible measure actually, one that no other OECD country uses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More importantly Dave, is that what is being measured is the number in poverty "before" any help they receive from the Govt. It does not include the effects of the EITC, of housing, of food stamps: it only includes direct cash transfers.</p>
<p>It's a terrible measure actually, one that no other OECD country uses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_poverty_rate_down_significantly/comment-page-1/#comment-144137</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/us_poverty_rate_down_significantly/#comment-144137</guid>
		<description>I wonder what proportion of those 18-64 at or below the poverty level are immigrants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what proportion of those 18-64 at or below the poverty level are immigrants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_poverty_rate_down_significantly/comment-page-1/#comment-144133</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/us_poverty_rate_down_significantly/#comment-144133</guid>
		<description>Something that&#039;s missing from the linked article that would be pretty helpful in understanding it is a description of how &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_the_United_States&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the official poverty rate&lt;/a&gt; is calculated.  While, theoretically, it&#039;s an absolute measure practically speaking it ain&#039;t necessarily so because the definition of what constitutes the necessities of living for the purposes of the calculation have changed over time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something that's missing from the linked article that would be pretty helpful in understanding it is a description of how <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_the_United_States" rel="nofollow">the official poverty rate</a> is calculated.  While, theoretically, it's an absolute measure practically speaking it ain't necessarily so because the definition of what constitutes the necessities of living for the purposes of the calculation have changed over time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triumph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_poverty_rate_down_significantly/comment-page-1/#comment-144122</link>
		<dc:creator>Triumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/us_poverty_rate_down_significantly/#comment-144122</guid>
		<description>The numbers get a bit more interesting when you look at the age breakdowns.

The real significant decline was in the over-65 set.   For the working stiffs (18-64) the poverty level was  higher and the median income lower than in 2001.

The census also reported today an increase of 2.2 million uninsured people over the last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The numbers get a bit more interesting when you look at the age breakdowns.</p>
<p>The real significant decline was in the over-65 set.   For the working stiffs (18-64) the poverty level was  higher and the median income lower than in 2001.</p>
<p>The census also reported today an increase of 2.2 million uninsured people over the last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
