<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. Tells D.C. to Pay Inaugural Security Expenses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_tells_dc_to_pay_inaugural_expenses_washingtonpostcom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_tells_dc_to_pay_inaugural_expenses_washingtonpostcom/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:56:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cj</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_tells_dc_to_pay_inaugural_expenses_washingtonpostcom/comment-page-1/#comment-31571</link>
		<dc:creator>cj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 02:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8753#comment-31571</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the &quot;cost&quot; is in part due to paying &quot;essential workers&quot; holiday pay?

Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the "cost" is in part due to paying "essential workers" holiday pay?</p>
<p>Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_tells_dc_to_pay_inaugural_expenses_washingtonpostcom/comment-page-1/#comment-31537</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8753#comment-31537</guid>
		<description>The federal government may not typically reimburse localities for presidential visits - I&#039;m not sure.  But it is clear from the blogs I&#039;ve been reading that every administration before this one (including Bush 2000) has covered the costs.  For some reason, the administration has chosen to change that precedent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The federal government may not typically reimburse localities for presidential visits - I'm not sure.  But it is clear from the blogs I've been reading that every administration before this one (including Bush 2000) has covered the costs.  For some reason, the administration has chosen to change that precedent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/us_tells_dc_to_pay_inaugural_expenses_washingtonpostcom/comment-page-1/#comment-31521</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8753#comment-31521</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a government contractor and don&#039;t get the day off. I think, perhaps, that with all of the Gvt. workers out of the office, the contractors will be able to do more work than would othewise get done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm a government contractor and don't get the day off. I think, perhaps, that with all of the Gvt. workers out of the office, the contractors will be able to do more work than would othewise get done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
