<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USDA Stops Measuring &#8216;Hunger,&#8217; Focuses on &#8216;Food Security&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/usda_stops_measuring_hunger_focuses_on_food_security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/usda_stops_measuring_hunger_focuses_on_food_security/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:44:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LJD</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/usda_stops_measuring_hunger_focuses_on_food_security/comment-page-1/#comment-104355</link>
		<dc:creator>LJD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/usda_stops_measuring_hunger_focuses_on_food_security/#comment-104355</guid>
		<description>How dare you make the argument that people are responsible for their own circumstances!  What on Earth would the Dems do to &#039;help&#039; these people!

This is America.  People who are &#039;starving&#039; do so by choice.  There are plenty of resources from churches, to soup kitchens, to financial assistance, that they choose not to utilize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How dare you make the argument that people are responsible for their own circumstances!  What on Earth would the Dems do to 'help' these people!</p>
<p>This is America.  People who are 'starving' do so by choice.  There are plenty of resources from churches, to soup kitchens, to financial assistance, that they choose not to utilize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/usda_stops_measuring_hunger_focuses_on_food_security/comment-page-1/#comment-104304</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 23:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/usda_stops_measuring_hunger_focuses_on_food_security/#comment-104304</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Most people I encounter seem to have far, far too much &lt;/em&gt;

Comment would be superfluous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Most people I encounter seem to have far, far too much </em></p>
<p>Comment would be superfluous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legion</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/usda_stops_measuring_hunger_focuses_on_food_security/comment-page-1/#comment-104287</link>
		<dc:creator>legion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/usda_stops_measuring_hunger_focuses_on_food_security/#comment-104287</guid>
		<description>Thanks to a very slow day at work, a haiku:

I am twelve percent.
I thought my food was secure.
Limbaugh stole my pie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to a very slow day at work, a haiku:</p>
<p>I am twelve percent.<br />
I thought my food was secure.<br />
Limbaugh stole my pie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yetanotherjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/usda_stops_measuring_hunger_focuses_on_food_security/comment-page-1/#comment-104274</link>
		<dc:creator>yetanotherjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 19:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/usda_stops_measuring_hunger_focuses_on_food_security/#comment-104274</guid>
		<description>There seems to be a disconnect in the report and your write up.

The USDA said that 12 percent of Americans — 35 million people — could not put food on the table at least part of last year.

While twelve percent are in the “very low security” category, less than a third of that group actually had someone go without eating for a single day in 2005. 

So apparently &quot;part of the year&quot; means one meal as only 31% said they didn&#039;t eat for a day.

I also found these statistics an interesting contrast. 96% in the &quot;low security&quot; said the food did not last and they did not have money to get more (just to be clear is this no money or no money and no food stamps). 44% said they lost weight because they did not have enough money for food. So apparently 52% ran out of money for food, but did not lose weight because of this and 65% ran out of money but didn&#039;t go hungry for the day. This would appear to be very transitory running out of money, with little real impact on food intake.

My wife fasts once a week voluntarily. So would she get counted in the 31% who missed a day of food?

It is also unclear to me from the write up (thank old media) if this is measured like poverty in the US (aka before government assistance).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There seems to be a disconnect in the report and your write up.</p>
<p>The USDA said that 12 percent of Americans — 35 million people — could not put food on the table at least part of last year.</p>
<p>While twelve percent are in the “very low security” category, less than a third of that group actually had someone go without eating for a single day in 2005. </p>
<p>So apparently "part of the year" means one meal as only 31% said they didn't eat for a day.</p>
<p>I also found these statistics an interesting contrast. 96% in the "low security" said the food did not last and they did not have money to get more (just to be clear is this no money or no money and no food stamps). 44% said they lost weight because they did not have enough money for food. So apparently 52% ran out of money for food, but did not lose weight because of this and 65% ran out of money but didn't go hungry for the day. This would appear to be very transitory running out of money, with little real impact on food intake.</p>
<p>My wife fasts once a week voluntarily. So would she get counted in the 31% who missed a day of food?</p>
<p>It is also unclear to me from the write up (thank old media) if this is measured like poverty in the US (aka before government assistance).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maniakes</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/usda_stops_measuring_hunger_focuses_on_food_security/comment-page-1/#comment-104270</link>
		<dc:creator>Maniakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/usda_stops_measuring_hunger_focuses_on_food_security/#comment-104270</guid>
		<description>When I was in college, several of my friends went hungry from time to time because they were new to this &quot;budgeting&quot; thing and spent most of their money on luxuries early in the month. Would they have counted in the USDA &#039;food security&#039; statistics?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was in college, several of my friends went hungry from time to time because they were new to this "budgeting" thing and spent most of their money on luxuries early in the month. Would they have counted in the USDA 'food security' statistics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
