http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/vp_cheney_to_special_ops_we_have_a_long_war_ahead_of_us/ Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:13:17 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/vp_cheney_to_special_ops_we_have_a_long_war_ahead_of_us/comment-page-1/#comment-48656 Juliette Mon, 13 Jun 2005 05:34:37 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10924#comment-48656 Be all of this as it may, SFC Johns has a nice rack with one more shiny to add to his jacket. Good for him! Be all of this as it may, SFC Johns has a nice rack with one more shiny to add to his jacket. Good for him!

]]> http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/vp_cheney_to_special_ops_we_have_a_long_war_ahead_of_us/comment-page-1/#comment-48596 Just Me Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:01:20 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10924#comment-48596 Don't know then-maybe there was some petty officer second class getting awarded that day, and the reporter got all the ranks confused, but shoot, how hard it is it to google up the enlisted ranks and insignia? Don't know then-maybe there was some petty officer second class getting awarded that day, and the reporter got all the ranks confused, but shoot, how hard it is it to google up the enlisted ranks and insignia?

]]> http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/vp_cheney_to_special_ops_we_have_a_long_war_ahead_of_us/comment-page-1/#comment-48583 James Joyner Sun, 12 Jun 2005 02:36:07 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10924#comment-48583 Could be--although they also made the same mistake in the main article. The blurb was what they linked to. Could be--although they also made the same mistake in the main article. The blurb was what they linked to.

]]> http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/vp_cheney_to_special_ops_we_have_a_long_war_ahead_of_us/comment-page-1/#comment-48582 Just Me Sun, 12 Jun 2005 02:07:41 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10924#comment-48582 Seems like that mistake may be the title editors mistake, since they got the Sergeant First Class right in the blurb describing the picture. What is weird is that nobody caught the mistake-since the correct rank was in the blurb. Seems like that mistake may be the title editors mistake, since they got the Sergeant First Class right in the blurb describing the picture. What is weird is that nobody caught the mistake-since the correct rank was in the blurb.

]]>