<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VULCAN T&amp;A</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/vulcan_ta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/vulcan_ta/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:37:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By:  » Gone Hollywood</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/vulcan_ta/comment-page-1/#comment-128138</link>
		<dc:creator> » Gone Hollywood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3208#comment-128138</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;  Jolene Blalock Playboy Interview  Better Than Star Trek  Star Trekâs James Doohan has Alzheimerâs  Straczynski on Trek  STAR TREK DIALECTIC  MERYL, MERYL, MERYL  TREK STRIP  TREK ECONOMY  VULCAN T&amp;A  MAYBERRY MEETS TREK  LILEKS ON TREK  VULCANS IN ALABAMA  TREK HUMOR  TREK ETHICS  BAD SCI-FI  INVISIBILITY CLOAK  &lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->  Jolene Blalock Playboy Interview  Better Than Star Trek  Star Trekâs James Doohan has Alzheimerâs  Straczynski on Trek  STAR TREK DIALECTIC  MERYL, MERYL, MERYL  TREK STRIP  TREK ECONOMY  VULCAN T&#038;A  MAYBERRY MEETS TREK  LILEKS ON TREK  VULCANS IN ALABAMA  TREK HUMOR  TREK ETHICS  BAD SCI-FI  INVISIBILITY CLOAK  <!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/vulcan_ta/comment-page-1/#comment-5792</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3208#comment-5792</guid>
		<description>So am I to understand that they came close but you did not see pictures of Jolene Blaylock nude?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So am I to understand that they came close but you did not see pictures of Jolene Blaylock nude?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/vulcan_ta/comment-page-1/#comment-5793</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3208#comment-5793</guid>
		<description>Hey, that&#039;s the closest a lot of Trek fans are going to get to a girl. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, that's the closest a lot of Trek fans are going to get to a girl. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnC</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/vulcan_ta/comment-page-1/#comment-5794</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3208#comment-5794</guid>
		<description>That was astoundingly gratuitous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was astoundingly gratuitous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/vulcan_ta/comment-page-1/#comment-5795</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3208#comment-5795</guid>
		<description>John... You obviously don&#039;t get the joke... 

Search the archive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John... You obviously don't get the joke... </p>
<p>Search the archive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Solo</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/vulcan_ta/comment-page-1/#comment-5796</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Solo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3208#comment-5796</guid>
		<description>Argh!  There was a premier tonight?!  Sheesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Argh!  There was a premier tonight?!  Sheesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 42nd SSD</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/vulcan_ta/comment-page-1/#comment-5797</link>
		<dc:creator>42nd SSD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3208#comment-5797</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s called the &quot;we&#039;re desperate&quot; syndrome, otherwise known as the &quot;T&amp;A is cheaper than a good story and draws a bigger crowd&quot; rule.  Makes me wonder about the idea of using T&amp;A to increase &quot;Meet the Press&quot;&#039;s draw.  (Is Meet the Press still on?  I haven&#039;t watched TV in ages... what year is this again?  1928?  Good.)

Maybe they should just change the Star Trek theme to &quot;Taps&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it's called the "we're desperate" syndrome, otherwise known as the "T&#038;A is cheaper than a good story and draws a bigger crowd" rule.  Makes me wonder about the idea of using T&#038;A to increase "Meet the Press"'s draw.  (Is Meet the Press still on?  I haven't watched TV in ages... what year is this again?  1928?  Good.)</p>
<p>Maybe they should just change the Star Trek theme to "Taps".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mtpolitics</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/vulcan_ta/comment-page-1/#comment-5798</link>
		<dc:creator>mtpolitics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3208#comment-5798</guid>
		<description>Personally, I don&#039;t think that Jolene Blaylock is all that hot.

To me, Linda Park is &lt;i&gt;much&lt;/i&gt; hotter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I don't think that Jolene Blaylock is all that hot.</p>
<p>To me, Linda Park is <i>much</i> hotter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jen</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/vulcan_ta/comment-page-1/#comment-5799</link>
		<dc:creator>jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3208#comment-5799</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I have no objection to seeing Blaylock&#039;s body; indeed, as best I can determine, displaying it is her primary talent. But that&#039;s not really supposed to be the point of a sci-fi show, let alone one in the Trek universe.&lt;/i&gt;

OK, you&#039;re kidding right?

Think back to the Original Star Trek...all of the women were in skimpy outfits, which back then were pretty scandalous for national TV. This is just more of the same, imho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I have no objection to seeing Blaylock's body; indeed, as best I can determine, displaying it is her primary talent. But that's not really supposed to be the point of a sci-fi show, let alone one in the Trek universe.</i></p>
<p>OK, you're kidding right?</p>
<p>Think back to the Original Star Trek...all of the women were in skimpy outfits, which back then were pretty scandalous for national TV. This is just more of the same, imho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/vulcan_ta/comment-page-1/#comment-5800</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3208#comment-5800</guid>
		<description>Jen,

You make a point.  Although I think Roddenberry saw miniskirts more as a political statement--a symbol of women&#039;s liberation--than about selling sex. And the female characters were generally rather ancillary, anyway, whereas T&#039;Pol is a central character in Enterprise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jen,</p>
<p>You make a point.  Although I think Roddenberry saw miniskirts more as a political statement--a symbol of women's liberation--than about selling sex. And the female characters were generally rather ancillary, anyway, whereas T'Pol is a central character in Enterprise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy K</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/vulcan_ta/comment-page-1/#comment-5801</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3208#comment-5801</guid>
		<description>What jen said. Also, I suspect that if the original weren&#039;t &#039;selling sex&#039; that Kirk wouldn&#039;t have &#039;fallen in love&#039; with every babe that he met...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What jen said. Also, I suspect that if the original weren't 'selling sex' that Kirk wouldn't have 'fallen in love' with every babe that he met...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jen</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/vulcan_ta/comment-page-1/#comment-5802</link>
		<dc:creator>jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3208#comment-5802</guid>
		<description>When I first wrote that I wasn&#039;t thinking of Uhura, really. I was thinking of the &quot;alien&quot; babes that Kirk drooled over. Their outfits were very skimpy - lots of skin. And that was blatant in the late 60s. I don&#039;t care that they were ancillary - it was in every episode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first wrote that I wasn't thinking of Uhura, really. I was thinking of the "alien" babes that Kirk drooled over. Their outfits were very skimpy - lots of skin. And that was blatant in the late 60s. I don't care that they were ancillary - it was in every episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan C</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/vulcan_ta/comment-page-1/#comment-5803</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3208#comment-5803</guid>
		<description>Oh definitely, the original Trek was certainly no exception in terms of alien babe appeal. It&#039;s said that the chief costume designer, William Theiss, considered the appeal of a female costume to be in direct proportion to how likely it seemed that the actress would fall out of it.

DS9 had actually three attractive female regulars: Major Kira and two incarnations of Dax. And there were generally lots of scantily clad females in Quark&#039;s bar. 

I think I&#039;ll stop now. It&#039;s starting to sound like I know waaay too much about this topic.



---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh definitely, the original Trek was certainly no exception in terms of alien babe appeal. It's said that the chief costume designer, William Theiss, considered the appeal of a female costume to be in direct proportion to how likely it seemed that the actress would fall out of it.</p>
<p>DS9 had actually three attractive female regulars: Major Kira and two incarnations of Dax. And there were generally lots of scantily clad females in Quark's bar. </p>
<p>I think I'll stop now. It's starting to sound like I know waaay too much about this topic.</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
