First it's "voted through dozens of Bills"
and then the one that caught his eye is "a report proposing that the British and French representatives on the UN Security Council be merged"

I presume he's talking about B6‑0328/2005 which was passed on the 9th of june. Except of course this isn't a bill. Or indeed any form of legislation.

It's a resolution suggesting that the SC nations in the EU should think about , at some point in the future, merging the 2 seats.

Ditto with the "creating a European Public Prosecutor","diplomatic service" etc.

It has no legal authority or weight at all.

Anyone who suggests it does (by calling it say "a bill") is either incompetent to discuss the EU or is deliberately attempting to mislead the reader.

From an article by Daniel Hannan in the Brussels Journal:
Before the French and Dutch referendums, I predicted that, if our neighbours voted “No”, the EU would ignore the result and implement the constitution as though nothing had happene...