<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WEBLOG TRAFFIC RANKINGS II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/weblog_traffic_rankings_ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/weblog_traffic_rankings_ii/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:17:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/weblog_traffic_rankings_ii/comment-page-1/#comment-3648</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2657#comment-3648</guid>
		<description>I risk being bashing into oblivion by saying this but I never realized how small the blogosphere was.

If ~1000 blogs combined are only getting 326,000 hits a day that is just tiny fraction of what I thought it was.  If you consider...

Most bloggers will check out 10-20 other blogs a day* 

and

Much of that traffic is the bloggers themselves editing thier own sites...

the number of people from outside the subculture is statistically miniscule compared to the people on the internet.

huh!

Paul

* this is a guess from what I hear people say. I have no idea if this is even measured. Put your favorite number in, the point is still valid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I risk being bashing into oblivion by saying this but I never realized how small the blogosphere was.</p>
<p>If ~1000 blogs combined are only getting 326,000 hits a day that is just tiny fraction of what I thought it was.  If you consider...</p>
<p>Most bloggers will check out 10-20 other blogs a day* </p>
<p>and</p>
<p>Much of that traffic is the bloggers themselves editing thier own sites...</p>
<p>the number of people from outside the subculture is statistically miniscule compared to the people on the internet.</p>
<p>huh!</p>
<p>Paul</p>
<p>* this is a guess from what I hear people say. I have no idea if this is even measured. Put your favorite number in, the point is still valid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/weblog_traffic_rankings_ii/comment-page-1/#comment-3649</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2657#comment-3649</guid>
		<description>Paul,

It is indeed quite small.  SiteMeter doesn&#039;t count much of the self-checking, so that&#039;s rather miniscule. And there are thousands of blogs not listed in the TTLB Ecosystem or included in the traffic ratings.  But, still, I&#039;d guess there are porn sites getting 300,000 visits a day.

Also: Note that the data is VISITS rather than PAGE VIEWS or HITS.  The others would be much higher.  For example, my own internal counter by my host shows 8132 unique visitors, 21248 visits, 76483 pages, and 296483 hits so far in July.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>
<p>It is indeed quite small.  SiteMeter doesn't count much of the self-checking, so that's rather miniscule. And there are thousands of blogs not listed in the TTLB Ecosystem or included in the traffic ratings.  But, still, I'd guess there are porn sites getting 300,000 visits a day.</p>
<p>Also: Note that the data is VISITS rather than PAGE VIEWS or HITS.  The others would be much higher.  For example, my own internal counter by my host shows 8132 unique visitors, 21248 visits, 76483 pages, and 296483 hits so far in July.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: serenity</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/weblog_traffic_rankings_ii/comment-page-1/#comment-3650</link>
		<dc:creator>serenity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2657#comment-3650</guid>
		<description>Paul-

With SiteMeter, (and some other counters), you can disable your own IP from being counted.  I don&#039;t know how many people actually do this--I would suspect if someone wanted accurate numbers they would and the ones who want to appear that they have more traffic than they do, wouldn&#039;t.  But it is possible to not count your own visits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul-</p>
<p>With SiteMeter, (and some other counters), you can disable your own IP from being counted.  I don't know how many people actually do this--I would suspect if someone wanted accurate numbers they would and the ones who want to appear that they have more traffic than they do, wouldn't.  But it is possible to not count your own visits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/weblog_traffic_rankings_ii/comment-page-1/#comment-3651</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2657#comment-3651</guid>
		<description>Paul and Serenity,

As Kevin of Wizbang reported when I brought up that issue a while back, even if you don&#039;t disable your own IP, SiteMeter only counts visits from a given IP that are over 30 minutes apart.  So, if the blogger logs on to his own sites once every 20 minutes during all his waking hours, that&#039;s just one hit.  Even if they&#039;re strategically trying to inflate their own count, we&#039;re talking only a handful a day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul and Serenity,</p>
<p>As Kevin of Wizbang reported when I brought up that issue a while back, even if you don't disable your own IP, SiteMeter only counts visits from a given IP that are over 30 minutes apart.  So, if the blogger logs on to his own sites once every 20 minutes during all his waking hours, that's just one hit.  Even if they're strategically trying to inflate their own count, we're talking only a handful a day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acidman</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/weblog_traffic_rankings_ii/comment-page-1/#comment-3652</link>
		<dc:creator>Acidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2657#comment-3652</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve noticed something strange about some sites.  There is NOT a large difference between their page views and visitors in a day.  I usually have almost twice the page views as I do visitors.

But I post a lot, and I suppose people check back frequently to see if something new is there.

I don&#039;t hide my stats.  You can check for yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've noticed something strange about some sites.  There is NOT a large difference between their page views and visitors in a day.  I usually have almost twice the page views as I do visitors.</p>
<p>But I post a lot, and I suppose people check back frequently to see if something new is there.</p>
<p>I don't hide my stats.  You can check for yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/weblog_traffic_rankings_ii/comment-page-1/#comment-3653</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2657#comment-3653</guid>
		<description>Acidman,

That&#039;s interesting.  Yours is 1.54 page views per visit.  Mine is 1.48.  InstaPundit&#039;s is 1.26.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Acidman,</p>
<p>That's interesting.  Yours is 1.54 page views per visit.  Mine is 1.48.  InstaPundit's is 1.26.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right We Are!</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/weblog_traffic_rankings_ii/comment-page-1/#comment-3654</link>
		<dc:creator>Right We Are!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2657#comment-3654</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ecosystem News&lt;/strong&gt;
James at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.outsidethebeltway.com&quot;&gt;Outside the Beltway&lt;/a&gt; has a good &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/002657.html&quot;&gt;analysis&lt;/a&gt; of traffic rankings from TTLB&#92;&#039;s 

---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ecosystem News</strong><br />
James at <a href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com">Outside the Beltway</a> has a good <a href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/002657.html">analysis</a> of traffic rankings from TTLB&#92;'s </p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
