<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: West Point Going Gender Neutral</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/west_point_going_gender_neutral/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/west_point_going_gender_neutral/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:49:13 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Gaffe-o-Matic</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/west_point_going_gender_neutral/comment-page-1/#comment-379166</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gaffe-o-Matic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 06:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/west_point_going_gender_neutral/#comment-379166</guid>
		<description>[...] PC at West Point. (Hat Tip: Outside the Beltway.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PC at West Point. (Hat Tip: Outside the Beltway.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/west_point_going_gender_neutral/comment-page-1/#comment-374413</link>
		<dc:creator>Floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 05:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/west_point_going_gender_neutral/#comment-374413</guid>
		<description>Grewgills&#039;
 Interesting addendum....
  Though many of these words are not officially recognized {yet?} they are all over the internet.
 Oddly &quot;misohomy&quot; is often offered as a more appropriate substitute for &quot;homophobia&quot;.
 There are organisations presenting themselves as 
&quot;masculinist&quot; as a part of their name or self description.
 I did find &quot;Masculist&quot; used as an obvious answer to Feminist.
 While I welcome the gradual evolution of the language, I do lament sometimes what appears to be the &quot;babelization&quot; of English.
[if there is such a word] [lol]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grewgills'<br />
 Interesting addendum....<br />
  Though many of these words are not officially recognized {yet?} they are all over the internet.<br />
 Oddly "misohomy" is often offered as a more appropriate substitute for "homophobia".<br />
 There are organisations presenting themselves as<br />
"masculinist" as a part of their name or self description.<br />
 I did find "Masculist" used as an obvious answer to Feminist.<br />
 While I welcome the gradual evolution of the language, I do lament sometimes what appears to be the "babelization" of English.<br />
[if there is such a word] [lol]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grewgills</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/west_point_going_gender_neutral/comment-page-1/#comment-374400</link>
		<dc:creator>Grewgills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 05:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/west_point_going_gender_neutral/#comment-374400</guid>
		<description>Floyd,
Masculinist is in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/masculinist&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Websters&lt;/a&gt; online dictionary though the definition is not parallel to the definition of feminist.  Make what you will of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Floyd,<br />
Masculinist is in <a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/masculinist" rel="nofollow">Websters</a> online dictionary though the definition is not parallel to the definition of feminist.  Make what you will of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/west_point_going_gender_neutral/comment-page-1/#comment-374386</link>
		<dc:creator>Floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 05:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/west_point_going_gender_neutral/#comment-374386</guid>
		<description>Grewgills; 
     Thank you for at least a partial correction.
 &quot;misandry&quot; does appear in Webster&#039;s New World dictionary as word
 &quot;modeled on misogyny&quot;
 It does not  appear in &quot;Microsoft Encarta Dictionary&quot; or in &quot;The New Century Unabridged Dictionary&quot;
 At any rate, it would really be a misconstruct rather than a misspelling, since the one now appears in A dictionary and the other doesn&#039;t.
 To that extent I stand corrected, thank you. 
 
 As for Masculinist; it does not appear in any of the above mentioned dictionaries in my library.
 &quot;Masculinist&quot; would seem to be the gender equivalent of &quot;femininist&quot;, whereas &quot;Masculist&quot; would logically and more appropriately be the gender equivalent of &quot;Feminist&quot;
 If in fact the dictionary publishers should recognize their existence at some point,which to date they have apparently not done. 
 Interesting response, thanks again.
 Incidently, neither &quot;word&quot; is recognized by the spell check.[lol]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grewgills;<br />
     Thank you for at least a partial correction.<br />
 "misandry" does appear in Webster's New World dictionary as word<br />
 "modeled on misogyny"<br />
 It does not  appear in "Microsoft Encarta Dictionary" or in "The New Century Unabridged Dictionary"<br />
 At any rate, it would really be a misconstruct rather than a misspelling, since the one now appears in A dictionary and the other doesn't.<br />
 To that extent I stand corrected, thank you. </p>
<p> As for Masculinist; it does not appear in any of the above mentioned dictionaries in my library.<br />
 "Masculinist" would seem to be the gender equivalent of "femininist", whereas "Masculist" would logically and more appropriately be the gender equivalent of "Feminist"<br />
 If in fact the dictionary publishers should recognize their existence at some point,which to date they have apparently not done.<br />
 Interesting response, thanks again.<br />
 Incidently, neither "word" is recognized by the spell check.[lol]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grewgills</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/west_point_going_gender_neutral/comment-page-1/#comment-374320</link>
		<dc:creator>Grewgills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 03:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/west_point_going_gender_neutral/#comment-374320</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Ever wonder why the words misohomy or masculist are not in the dictionary?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Because the words you are looking for are misandry and masculinist.  Check Websters or OED it&#039;s not about institutionalized linguistic unfairness, it&#039;s about poor spelling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Ever wonder why the words misohomy or masculist are not in the dictionary?</p></blockquote>
<p>Because the words you are looking for are misandry and masculinist.  Check Websters or OED it's not about institutionalized linguistic unfairness, it's about poor spelling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/west_point_going_gender_neutral/comment-page-1/#comment-373616</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 20:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/west_point_going_gender_neutral/#comment-373616</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;At least you are still willing to admit to misology, by substituting facetious nonsense.&lt;/blockquote&gt;I&#039;m saying we create definitions for things that are new or different, because they are new and different.  We have more extreme adjectives than we have moderate adjectives.  We call a noise loud or soft, but we don&#039;t usually label it moderate unless we are comparing it to another noise that is either loud or soft, and sometimes not even then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>At least you are still willing to admit to misology, by substituting facetious nonsense.</p></blockquote>
<p>I'm saying we create definitions for things that are new or different, because they are new and different.  We have more extreme adjectives than we have moderate adjectives.  We call a noise loud or soft, but we don't usually label it moderate unless we are comparing it to another noise that is either loud or soft, and sometimes not even then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/west_point_going_gender_neutral/comment-page-1/#comment-373604</link>
		<dc:creator>Floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 20:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/west_point_going_gender_neutral/#comment-373604</guid>
		<description>Michael; 
         At least you are still willing to admit to misology, by substituting facetious nonsense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael;<br />
         At least you are still willing to admit to misology, by substituting facetious nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/west_point_going_gender_neutral/comment-page-1/#comment-373559</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 20:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/west_point_going_gender_neutral/#comment-373559</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Ever wonder why the words misohomy or masculist are not in the dictionary?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Because we already have definitions for &quot;tradition&quot;, &quot;custom&quot; and &quot;default&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Ever wonder why the words misohomy or masculist are not in the dictionary?</p></blockquote>
<p>Because we already have definitions for "tradition", "custom" and "default"?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/west_point_going_gender_neutral/comment-page-1/#comment-373556</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 20:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/west_point_going_gender_neutral/#comment-373556</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Always look on the dark side of life...&lt;/blockquote&gt;...and you&#039;ll never be disappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Always look on the dark side of life...</p></blockquote>
<p>...and you'll never be disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/west_point_going_gender_neutral/comment-page-1/#comment-373541</link>
		<dc:creator>Floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 19:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/west_point_going_gender_neutral/#comment-373541</guid>
		<description>Legion; 
 Ever wonder why the words misohomy or masculist are not in the dictionary?
 A little misology, maybe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legion;<br />
 Ever wonder why the words misohomy or masculist are not in the dictionary?<br />
 A little misology, maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles austin</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/west_point_going_gender_neutral/comment-page-1/#comment-373486</link>
		<dc:creator>charles austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 18:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/west_point_going_gender_neutral/#comment-373486</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I wonder what sort of misogyny this will bring to the surface...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Always look on the dark side of life...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I wonder what sort of misogyny this will bring to the surface...</p></blockquote>
<p>Always look on the dark side of life...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/west_point_going_gender_neutral/comment-page-1/#comment-373485</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 18:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/west_point_going_gender_neutral/#comment-373485</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I wonder what sort of misogyny this will bring to the surface...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh, some I&#039;m sure. Mostly, though, the resistance will be of the &quot;tradition for tradition&#039;s sake&quot; variety. Most of the Old Grads have resigned themselves to the Corps going co-ed by now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I wonder what sort of misogyny this will bring to the surface...</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, some I'm sure. Mostly, though, the resistance will be of the "tradition for tradition's sake" variety. Most of the Old Grads have resigned themselves to the Corps going co-ed by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legion</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/west_point_going_gender_neutral/comment-page-1/#comment-373484</link>
		<dc:creator>legion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 18:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/west_point_going_gender_neutral/#comment-373484</guid>
		<description>Wow. That&#039;s actually a really big deal. I still remember when the Citadel went co-ed, and the virulent backlash that brought out from (some of) their alumni. I wonder what sort of misogyny this will bring to the surface...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. That's actually a really big deal. I still remember when the Citadel went co-ed, and the virulent backlash that brought out from (some of) their alumni. I wonder what sort of misogyny this will bring to the surface...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
