<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: West Point Sues Anti-War Grads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/west_point_sues_anti-war_grads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/west_point_sues_anti-war_grads/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:50:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: yetanotherjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/west_point_sues_anti-war_grads/comment-page-1/#comment-81763</link>
		<dc:creator>yetanotherjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 17:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/west_point_sues_anti-war_grads/#comment-81763</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not up on the case law, but from what I remember, if there is a reasonable chance of confusion with the trademark holder (whom I will assume is the USMA), they should win. The key issue to me is if they can show other &quot;west point alum&quot; organisations using the name without licensing. I suspect that the &quot;west point&quot; trademark has limitations restricting it to some connection to the USMA (as opposed to a geographical feature).

Just thinking about this I could imagine some other trademark cases (assuming they have the trademark) for &quot;Democrat&#039;s for the subjugation of America to Islamic Terrorist&quot; or &quot;Republicans for the rounding up and killing of anyone not like us&quot;. Could the party&#039;s sue in such a case?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm not up on the case law, but from what I remember, if there is a reasonable chance of confusion with the trademark holder (whom I will assume is the USMA), they should win. The key issue to me is if they can show other "west point alum" organisations using the name without licensing. I suspect that the "west point" trademark has limitations restricting it to some connection to the USMA (as opposed to a geographical feature).</p>
<p>Just thinking about this I could imagine some other trademark cases (assuming they have the trademark) for "Democrat's for the subjugation of America to Islamic Terrorist" or "Republicans for the rounding up and killing of anyone not like us". Could the party's sue in such a case?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zelsdorf Ragshaft III</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/west_point_sues_anti-war_grads/comment-page-1/#comment-81665</link>
		<dc:creator>Zelsdorf Ragshaft III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 15:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/west_point_sues_anti-war_grads/#comment-81665</guid>
		<description>I would like to see these warriors try to prove their claim that someone lied, cheated or stole to get us into the Iraq war.  Those cowards have believed the lies of a negitive press.  In which other conflict of this size has the U.S. experience a .2% casualty rate?  Certainly not Viet Nam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see these warriors try to prove their claim that someone lied, cheated or stole to get us into the Iraq war.  Those cowards have believed the lies of a negitive press.  In which other conflict of this size has the U.S. experience a .2% casualty rate?  Certainly not Viet Nam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/west_point_sues_anti-war_grads/comment-page-1/#comment-81659</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 13:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/west_point_sues_anti-war_grads/#comment-81659</guid>
		<description>AFAIK, the leading case on this issue is Playboy v. Wells.  Wells, a former Playboy Playmate of the Month, was sued for trademark infrigment.  The Court decided that Welles&#039;s use of the words &quot;playboy&quot; and &quot;playmate&quot; were a &quot;fair use&quot; of Playboy&#039;s trademarks because they fairly described and identified her achievements, and Playboy had failed to introduce compelling evidence of actual consumer confusion over the arms-length relationship between Welles&#039;s site and Playboy.

http://partners.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/12/cyber/cyberlaw/17law.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AFAIK, the leading case on this issue is Playboy v. Wells.  Wells, a former Playboy Playmate of the Month, was sued for trademark infrigment.  The Court decided that Welles's use of the words "playboy" and "playmate" were a "fair use" of Playboy's trademarks because they fairly described and identified her achievements, and Playboy had failed to introduce compelling evidence of actual consumer confusion over the arms-length relationship between Welles's site and Playboy.</p>
<p><a href="http://partners.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/12/cyber/cyberlaw/17law.html" rel="nofollow">http://partners.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/12/cyber/cyberlaw/17law.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spam filter software guide</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/west_point_sues_anti-war_grads/comment-page-1/#comment-126430</link>
		<dc:creator>Spam filter software guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/west_point_sues_anti-war_grads/#comment-126430</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;CM readers know that my siblings and I recently set up our 91-year-old father’s house to accommodate round-the-clock nursing care. We turned our late mother’s dressing room into a pretty single bedroom just twenty feet from Dad’s bed so thatWest Point Sues Anti-War Grads Outside Beltway - The United States Military Academy, a/k/a, the United States Government, a/k/a the citizens of the United States are suing a group of West Point graduates who have organized against the Iraq War to prevent their use of the West Point&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->CM readers know that my siblings and I recently set up our 91-year-old father&rsquo;s house to accommodate round-the-clock nursing care. We turned our late mother&rsquo;s dressing room into a pretty single bedroom just twenty feet from Dad&rsquo;s bed so thatWest Point Sues Anti-War Grads Outside Beltway - The United States Military Academy, a/k/a, the United States Government, a/k/a the citizens of the United States are suing a group of West Point graduates who have organized against the Iraq War to prevent their use of the West Point<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
