<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where President Bush Needs to Be</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/where_president_bush_needs_to_be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/where_president_bush_needs_to_be/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:18:13 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: matt stanley</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/where_president_bush_needs_to_be/comment-page-1/#comment-22962</link>
		<dc:creator>matt stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7299#comment-22962</guid>
		<description>Easy win for Bush. This is the best any incumbent has looked before his convention. In the future, the homocrats will need to attract more than just blacks and homosexuals to their party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easy win for Bush. This is the best any incumbent has looked before his convention. In the future, the homocrats will need to attract more than just blacks and homosexuals to their party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcthrowback</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/where_president_bush_needs_to_be/comment-page-1/#comment-22803</link>
		<dc:creator>dcthrowback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7299#comment-22803</guid>
		<description>Pardon me if I take DCLoser&#039;s claim with several grains of salt and a large margarita.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pardon me if I take DCLoser's claim with several grains of salt and a large margarita.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/where_president_bush_needs_to_be/comment-page-1/#comment-22773</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 22:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7299#comment-22773</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be interested in getting on that mailing list. Is it all this good?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'd be interested in getting on that mailing list. Is it all this good?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jen</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/where_president_bush_needs_to_be/comment-page-1/#comment-22768</link>
		<dc:creator>jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 20:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7299#comment-22768</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Do you really think most people on your mailing list are idiots?&lt;/i&gt;

Their lips may say, &quot;No,&quot; but their heads will be nodding, &quot;yes.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Do you really think most people on your mailing list are idiots?</i></p>
<p>Their lips may say, "No," but their heads will be nodding, "yes."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Oglesby</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/where_president_bush_needs_to_be/comment-page-1/#comment-22754</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Oglesby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7299#comment-22754</guid>
		<description>Basing your campaign strategy on reliance on statistical odds rather than your candidate&#039;s stand on the issues seems rather strange.  &#039;Any given Sunday,&#039; and all.

Oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basing your campaign strategy on reliance on statistical odds rather than your candidate's stand on the issues seems rather strange.  'Any given Sunday,' and all.</p>
<p>Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian J.</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/where_president_bush_needs_to_be/comment-page-1/#comment-22753</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7299#comment-22753</guid>
		<description>I see the asterisk that hedges the whole message:

Bush is not an &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;elected&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; incumbent, he&#039;s a &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;selected&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;nt, ainna?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the asterisk that hedges the whole message:</p>
<p>Bush is not an <i><b>elected</b></i> incumbent, he's a <i><b>selected</b></i>nt, ainna?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC Loser</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/where_president_bush_needs_to_be/comment-page-1/#comment-22752</link>
		<dc:creator>DC Loser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7299#comment-22752</guid>
		<description>Jame,

  Why don&#039;t you just unsubscribe to the Kerry emails?  Or do you actually get a perverse joy from reading them?  I&#039;m still a registered Republican so I get all the GOP crap, like the signed picture of Bush that I immediately throw in the trash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jame,</p>
<p>  Why don't you just unsubscribe to the Kerry emails?  Or do you actually get a perverse joy from reading them?  I'm still a registered Republican so I get all the GOP crap, like the signed picture of Bush that I immediately throw in the trash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/where_president_bush_needs_to_be/comment-page-1/#comment-22751</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 17:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7299#comment-22751</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m gonna go out on a limb, here.
I&#039;m unconvinced that four points of bounce being seen is unrealistic. I&#039;ll grant that most of the post convention bounce won&#039;t be from the convention itself, directly... most will be from Kerry&#039;s implosion ove rthe past week finaly showing up in the numbers... but it&#039;ll be seen as post Conventon boost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm gonna go out on a limb, here.<br />
I'm unconvinced that four points of bounce being seen is unrealistic. I'll grant that most of the post convention bounce won't be from the convention itself, directly... most will be from Kerry's implosion ove rthe past week finaly showing up in the numbers... but it'll be seen as post Conventon boost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
