<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White,  Able-bodied  Males Need Not Apply</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/white_able-bodied_males_need_not_apply/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/white_able-bodied_males_need_not_apply/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:42:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arthur Keech</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/white_able-bodied_males_need_not_apply/comment-page-1/#comment-65913</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur Keech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2005 05:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/12719#comment-65913</guid>
		<description>For the record I&#039;m a 17 year old Caucasian male who might be interested in a government position. Now i understand the arguments against what i would qualify as &quot;constructive racism&#039; but when the status quo is so far from the norm something must be done. Yes it is drastic but this is a massive problem. How can we expect people to represent Canada as a whole when they are so far from societal norms. Accountability is only possible when people are correctly represented. Power must be shared according to each group depending upon their share of the population pie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record I'm a 17 year old Caucasian male who might be interested in a government position. Now i understand the arguments against what i would qualify as "constructive racism' but when the status quo is so far from the norm something must be done. Yes it is drastic but this is a massive problem. How can we expect people to represent Canada as a whole when they are so far from societal norms. Accountability is only possible when people are correctly represented. Power must be shared according to each group depending upon their share of the population pie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Issues</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/white_able-bodied_males_need_not_apply/comment-page-1/#comment-65732</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Issues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 03:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/12719#comment-65732</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;No White Males Allowed ? by order of Public Works Canada&lt;/strong&gt;

It&#039;s unfortunate, but a bit expected, that a country with borders open to anyone in the world regardless of their past history or affiliations ? without discrimination ? would blacklist the lineage of men who have paved much of the...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>No White Males Allowed ? by order of Public Works Canada</strong></p>
<p>It's unfortunate, but a bit expected, that a country with borders open to anyone in the world regardless of their past history or affiliations ? without discrimination ? would blacklist the lineage of men who have paved much of the...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LJD</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/white_able-bodied_males_need_not_apply/comment-page-1/#comment-65278</link>
		<dc:creator>LJD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/12719#comment-65278</guid>
		<description>&quot;...only visible minorities, women, aboriginals and the disabled&quot; What amounts to visible?  

I can see it now:  
&quot;I&#039;m sorry Mr. Jones, you&#039;re just not black enough&quot;
&quot;I&#039;m sorry Mrs. Jones, you&#039;re just not feminine engouh (this IS a public works position, no?)&quot;
&quot;I&#039;m sorry Mr. Jones, you&#039;re just not handicapped enough (perhaps you can operate some heavy machinery?)&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"...only visible minorities, women, aboriginals and the disabled" What amounts to visible?  </p>
<p>I can see it now:<br />
"I'm sorry Mr. Jones, you're just not black enough"<br />
"I'm sorry Mrs. Jones, you're just not feminine engouh (this IS a public works position, no?)"<br />
"I'm sorry Mr. Jones, you're just not handicapped enough (perhaps you can operate some heavy machinery?)"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Florida Masochist</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/white_able-bodied_males_need_not_apply/comment-page-1/#comment-65270</link>
		<dc:creator>The Florida Masochist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/12719#comment-65270</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Knucklehead of the Day award&lt;/strong&gt;

Today&#039;s winner is Canada&#039;s department of Public Works</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Knucklehead of the Day award</strong></p>
<p>Today's winner is Canada's department of Public Works</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cardinal Martini</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/white_able-bodied_males_need_not_apply/comment-page-1/#comment-65248</link>
		<dc:creator>Cardinal Martini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 01:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/12719#comment-65248</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Action (affirmative or otherwise)&lt;/strong&gt;

My favorite argument against affirmative action has long been this; hiring or accepting a person based primarily upon his skin-color undermines other people&#039;s confidence in all the other people they encounter who look like this fellow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Action (affirmative or otherwise)</strong></p>
<p>My favorite argument against affirmative action has long been this; hiring or accepting a person based primarily upon his skin-color undermines other people's confidence in all the other people they encounter who look like this fellow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
