Comments on: Why Campaign Coverage Doesn’t Suck http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_campaign_coverage_doesnt_suck/ Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:10:12 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: laura http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_campaign_coverage_doesnt_suck/comment-page-1/#comment-268117 laura Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:22:12 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/01/why_campaign_coverage_doesnt_suck/#comment-268117 I disagree. I think thses stories are examples of why the coverage does suck. These are substance-free horse race stories. There is little there that explains what each candidate believes or intends, little to help the voter decide who to vote for. I disagree. I think thses stories are examples of why the coverage does suck.

These are substance-free horse race stories. There is little there that explains what each candidate believes or intends, little to help the voter decide who to vote for.

]]> By: charles austin http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_campaign_coverage_doesnt_suck/comment-page-1/#comment-268071 charles austin Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:29:30 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/01/why_campaign_coverage_doesnt_suck/#comment-268071 Because the campaigns suck? Is this a trick question? Because the campaigns suck? Is this a trick question?

]]>