<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WHY NOT?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:53:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not/comment-page-1/#comment-8253</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3936#comment-8253</guid>
		<description>There is a sports radio station in Dallas called The Ticket (http://www.theticket.com).  Last year about this time, one of the afternoon drive time host said that within 2 years, Britney will have posed for Playboy.  Nobody agreed with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a sports radio station in Dallas called The Ticket (<a href="http://www.theticket.com)" rel="nofollow">http://www.theticket.com)</a>.  Last year about this time, one of the afternoon drive time host said that within 2 years, Britney will have posed for Playboy.  Nobody agreed with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Little Miss Attila</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not/comment-page-1/#comment-8254</link>
		<dc:creator>Little Miss Attila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3936#comment-8254</guid>
		<description>&quot;Curvy&quot;? Britney?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Curvy"? Britney?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not/comment-page-1/#comment-8255</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3936#comment-8255</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t around at the time, but wasn&#039;t &lt;i&gt;Esquire&lt;/i&gt; the &quot;original&quot; girlie mag? As in, before &lt;i&gt;Playboy&lt;/i&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn't around at the time, but wasn't <i>Esquire</i> the "original" girlie mag? As in, before <i>Playboy</i>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not/comment-page-1/#comment-8256</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3936#comment-8256</guid>
		<description>LMA: She looks pretty curvy to me! She&#039;s thin and fit, but still looks like a woman.

Kev: That thought occured to me as well.  Not sure if Esquire was the first, but Playboy almost certainly wasn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LMA: She looks pretty curvy to me! She's thin and fit, but still looks like a woman.</p>
<p>Kev: That thought occured to me as well.  Not sure if Esquire was the first, but Playboy almost certainly wasn't.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Little Miss Attila</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not/comment-page-1/#comment-8257</link>
		<dc:creator>Little Miss Attila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3936#comment-8257</guid>
		<description>James: I guess I associate the word &quot;curvy&quot; with the 1930s-style bod: buxom, with a little bit more belly than is fashionable these days. I certainly wasn&#039;t casting aspersions on Britney&#039;s femininity.

I&#039;m not sure what the first skin mag was, but there was a publication called Playgirl (not the latter-day version, with naked men) that pre-dates Playboy. Same concept, though: pretty women, no clothes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James: I guess I associate the word "curvy" with the 1930s-style bod: buxom, with a little bit more belly than is fashionable these days. I certainly wasn't casting aspersions on Britney's femininity.</p>
<p>I'm not sure what the first skin mag was, but there was a publication called Playgirl (not the latter-day version, with naked men) that pre-dates Playboy. Same concept, though: pretty women, no clothes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Electric Venom</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not/comment-page-1/#comment-8258</link>
		<dc:creator>Electric Venom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3936#comment-8258</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Letter Of The Day Is J&lt;/strong&gt;
J is for join the Snark Hunt by submitting your links to BiteMe AT ElectricVenom DOT com! J is for Jay channeling John Adams. J is for jeremiads on the death penalty. J is for jejune economic ideas. J is for jocosity over misheard song lyrics. J is for...

---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Letter Of The Day Is J</strong><br />
J is for join the Snark Hunt by submitting your links to BiteMe AT ElectricVenom DOT com! J is for Jay channeling John Adams. J is for jeremiads on the death penalty. J is for jejune economic ideas. J is for jocosity over misheard song lyrics. J is for...</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
