<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Not Hillary?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not_hillary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not_hillary/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:46:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick Almeida</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not_hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-507533</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Almeida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24961#comment-507533</guid>
		<description>Is there any actual, empirical evidence that shows Obama significantly lags today in the demographic groups in which Clinton did well?

By the same token, are there any serious estimates or analyses of the numbers &amp; demographics of Clinton voters who claim not to be voting for Obama?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any actual, empirical evidence that shows Obama significantly lags today in the demographic groups in which Clinton did well?</p>
<p>By the same token, are there any serious estimates or analyses of the numbers &amp; demographics of Clinton voters who claim not to be voting for Obama?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not_hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-507532</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24961#comment-507532</guid>
		<description>Okay, one more time:

Who says Hillary *wanted* to be the VP?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, one more time:</p>
<p>Who says Hillary *wanted* to be the VP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yetanotherjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not_hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-507512</link>
		<dc:creator>yetanotherjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 04:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24961#comment-507512</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://bitsblog.florack.us/?p=11133&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Poll&lt;/a&gt; out showing that Biden is producing no bounce (and actually down from pre-Biden).  And that there is a sizable number of disaffected Clinton voters out there interested in McCain. So maybe this ad has more fertile ground than is being credited to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bitsblog.florack.us/?p=11133" rel="nofollow">Poll</a> out showing that Biden is producing no bounce (and actually down from pre-Biden).  And that there is a sizable number of disaffected Clinton voters out there interested in McCain. So maybe this ad has more fertile ground than is being credited to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not_hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-507506</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 02:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24961#comment-507506</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Well, look; it seems fairly clear to me that what&#039;s going on here is McCain&#039;s people are investing some effort in reinforcing the number of people among Clinton&#039;s supporters who will be voting for John McCain; &lt;/blockquote&gt;The question is whether this particular investment will pay off.  I&#039;m with those who think it won&#039;t, that it&#039;s too blatant, and will cause more backlash than support.  Like you said, the die-hard Clinton supporter are very self-focused, and this ad didn&#039;t focus attention on them at all, but rather on Obama.  If McCain had given them even the appearance of actual attention, it would have gotten him more of their support than this will.

&lt;blockquote&gt;McCain is simply driving the truck through the hole Obama created.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Given the ability of McCain&#039;s campaign so far, the hole is probably a pretty safe place to stand.  He&#039;ll aim for it, sure, but I have no confidence that he and his campaign can actually hit it.

&lt;blockquote&gt;With Obama and Biden trying to out-gaffe each other that doesn&#039;t seem much of a challenge. Add to that the amount of tape we have on Biden, and this one&#039;s going to be ...ummm ... amusing.&lt;/blockquote&gt;I doubt it.  The American public forgets very quickly, even if you have tape to remind them, they stop caring about it.  McCain was at least smart enough to get that ad out as fast as he can, because next week nobody is going to care what Biden said about Obama last week.

That said, McCain&#039;s campaign does need to try and preempt the predictable &quot;noun, a verb, and POW&quot; line, since Biden is the only one who could have used it effectively.  If it&#039;s not a part of his convention speech, I&#039;ll be surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Well, look; it seems fairly clear to me that what's going on here is McCain's people are investing some effort in reinforcing the number of people among Clinton's supporters who will be voting for John McCain; </p></blockquote>
<p>The question is whether this particular investment will pay off.  I'm with those who think it won't, that it's too blatant, and will cause more backlash than support.  Like you said, the die-hard Clinton supporter are very self-focused, and this ad didn't focus attention on them at all, but rather on Obama.  If McCain had given them even the appearance of actual attention, it would have gotten him more of their support than this will.</p>
<blockquote><p>McCain is simply driving the truck through the hole Obama created.</p></blockquote>
<p>Given the ability of McCain's campaign so far, the hole is probably a pretty safe place to stand.  He'll aim for it, sure, but I have no confidence that he and his campaign can actually hit it.</p>
<blockquote><p>With Obama and Biden trying to out-gaffe each other that doesn't seem much of a challenge. Add to that the amount of tape we have on Biden, and this one's going to be ...ummm ... amusing.</p></blockquote>
<p>I doubt it.  The American public forgets very quickly, even if you have tape to remind them, they stop caring about it.  McCain was at least smart enough to get that ad out as fast as he can, because next week nobody is going to care what Biden said about Obama last week.</p>
<p>That said, McCain's campaign does need to try and preempt the predictable "noun, a verb, and POW" line, since Biden is the only one who could have used it effectively.  If it's not a part of his convention speech, I'll be surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjin-san</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not_hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-507501</link>
		<dc:creator>anjin-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 01:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24961#comment-507501</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;With Obama and Biden trying to out-gaffe each other&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Umm, yea. And how are we doing with those Al Qaeda who are training in Iran?
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Or are you, as I suppose, simply trying on your new cheerleaders outfit?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Once upon a time, I was pretty good at taking those off. Have not, as yet, tried one on.

BTW... Did you hear? He was a POW...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>With Obama and Biden trying to out-gaffe each other</p></blockquote>
<p>Umm, yea. And how are we doing with those Al Qaeda who are training in Iran?</p>
<blockquote><p>
Or are you, as I suppose, simply trying on your new cheerleaders outfit?</p></blockquote>
<p>Once upon a time, I was pretty good at taking those off. Have not, as yet, tried one on.</p>
<p>BTW... Did you hear? He was a POW...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not_hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-507496</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24961#comment-507496</guid>
		<description>So, Anjin; are you implying you won&#039;t attack whoever McCain picks to be VP? Or are you, as I suppose, simply trying on your new cheerleaders outfit?

Fascinating.

&lt;blockquote&gt;The McCain campaign&#039;s big challenge is to keep the focus off of McCain by any means necessary...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

With Obama and Biden trying to out-gaffe each other that doesn&#039;t seem much of a challenge. Add to that the amount of tape we have on Biden, and this one&#039;s going to be ...ummm ... &lt;em&gt;amusing.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Anjin; are you implying you won't attack whoever McCain picks to be VP? Or are you, as I suppose, simply trying on your new cheerleaders outfit?</p>
<p>Fascinating.</p>
<blockquote><p>The McCain campaign's big challenge is to keep the focus off of McCain by any means necessary...</p></blockquote>
<p>With Obama and Biden trying to out-gaffe each other that doesn't seem much of a challenge. Add to that the amount of tape we have on Biden, and this one's going to be ...ummm ... <em>amusing.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjin-san</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not_hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-507491</link>
		<dc:creator>anjin-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24961#comment-507491</guid>
		<description>Yawn.

If Obama had selected Hillary, McCain would be attacking him for that right now. The McCain campaign&#039;s big challenge is to keep the focus off of McCain by any means necessary...

BTW... Did you hear? He was a POW...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yawn.</p>
<p>If Obama had selected Hillary, McCain would be attacking him for that right now. The McCain campaign's big challenge is to keep the focus off of McCain by any means necessary...</p>
<p>BTW... Did you hear? He was a POW...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Best Out of All the Possible Choices &#171; Liberty Street</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not_hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-507490</link>
		<dc:creator>The Best Out of All the Possible Choices &#171; Liberty Street</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24961#comment-507490</guid>
		<description>[...] James Joyner scoffs at Kristol&#8217;s claim that Clinton&#8217;s and Biden&#8217;s foreign policy experience are &#8220;comparable&#8221;: And, please, let’s not pretend that Hillary Clinton has anything like Joe Biden’s foreign policy gravitas. It’s been his bread and butter since Hillary was in law school. She’s a junior Senate backbencher whose “experience” until eight years ago consisted of being married to a powerful man. Did she learn a lot as a result of that partnership? Sure. Is it comparable to chairing the Foreign Relations Committee? Not hardly. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] James Joyner scoffs at Kristol&#8217;s claim that Clinton&#8217;s and Biden&#8217;s foreign policy experience are &#8220;comparable&#8221;: And, please, let&rsquo;s not pretend that Hillary Clinton has anything like Joe Biden&rsquo;s foreign policy gravitas. It&rsquo;s been his bread and butter since Hillary was in law school. She&rsquo;s a junior Senate backbencher whose “experience” until eight years ago consisted of being married to a powerful man. Did she learn a lot as a result of that partnership? Sure. Is it comparable to chairing the Foreign Relations Committee? Not hardly. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Below The Beltway &#187; Blog Archive &#187; McCain To Obama: Why Not Hillary ?</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not_hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-507488</link>
		<dc:creator>Below The Beltway &#187; Blog Archive &#187; McCain To Obama: Why Not Hillary ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 21:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24961#comment-507488</guid>
		<description>[...] I have to wonder whether an ad like this is really going to do any good, and, I agree with James Joyner&#8217;s point about the McCain&#8217;s apparent attempt to appear to the PUMA&#8217;s a... Stoking the lingering resentments of the Hillary camp is probably smart politics, although doing it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have to wonder whether an ad like this is really going to do any good, and, I agree with James Joyner&#8217;s point about the McCain&#8217;s apparent attempt to appear to the PUMA&#8217;s a... Stoking the lingering resentments of the Hillary camp is probably smart politics, although doing it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skills</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not_hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-507487</link>
		<dc:creator>skills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 21:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24961#comment-507487</guid>
		<description>What a joke- Biden. Clinton was the best choice for President or vice President. I don&#039;t think Obama has good Judgment (friends, Church, his votes in 
Senate) or experience needed to run the county. America needs a true leader not a rock star. This is why democrats keep losing can&#039;t find a true leader.But good Luck!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a joke- Biden. Clinton was the best choice for President or vice President. I don't think Obama has good Judgment (friends, Church, his votes in<br />
Senate) or experience needed to run the county. America needs a true leader not a rock star. This is why democrats keep losing can't find a true leader.But good Luck!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not_hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-507484</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24961#comment-507484</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;triumph, speaking of silly. Did you read your own post? Just in case you truely do not understand, McCain is a Republican, Clinton seems to be a democrat. The chances Hillary could get the Republican nomination are infinitely small. But just for the sake of stupidity. Hillary would destroy Obama in the general.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Pwnnnnnnnnnned!

But then it&#039;s Zelsdorf Ragshaft III, of the ClubbedBabySeals Ragshafts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>triumph, speaking of silly. Did you read your own post? Just in case you truely do not understand, McCain is a Republican, Clinton seems to be a democrat. The chances Hillary could get the Republican nomination are infinitely small. But just for the sake of stupidity. Hillary would destroy Obama in the general.</p></blockquote>
<p>Pwnnnnnnnnnned!</p>
<p>But then it's Zelsdorf Ragshaft III, of the ClubbedBabySeals Ragshafts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zelsdorf Ragshaft III</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not_hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-507483</link>
		<dc:creator>Zelsdorf Ragshaft III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24961#comment-507483</guid>
		<description>triumph, speaking of silly.  Did you read your own post?  Just in case you truely do not understand, McCain is a Republican, Clinton seems to be a democrat.  The chances Hillary could get the Republican nomination are infinitely small.  But just for the sake of stupidity.  Hillary would destroy Obama in the general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>triumph, speaking of silly.  Did you read your own post?  Just in case you truely do not understand, McCain is a Republican, Clinton seems to be a democrat.  The chances Hillary could get the Republican nomination are infinitely small.  But just for the sake of stupidity.  Hillary would destroy Obama in the general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: triumph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not_hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-507481</link>
		<dc:creator>triumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24961#comment-507481</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But the idea that Clinton was somehow owed a VP offer is silly.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Dude, you are misconstruing the argument.  This is a portent that McCain is likely to cede the Republican nomination to Hillary at the Minneapolis convention.

Since mcCain only got 9.5 million votes during primary season and Hillary earned 18 million, he is morally bound to drop out of the race and let Hillary run against B. Hussein in the general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But the idea that Clinton was somehow owed a VP offer is silly.</p></blockquote>
<p>Dude, you are misconstruing the argument.  This is a portent that McCain is likely to cede the Republican nomination to Hillary at the Minneapolis convention.</p>
<p>Since mcCain only got 9.5 million votes during primary season and Hillary earned 18 million, he is morally bound to drop out of the race and let Hillary run against B. Hussein in the general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political Animal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not_hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-507477</link>
		<dc:creator>Political Animal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24961#comment-507477</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Who knew Kristol was such a feminist?...&lt;/strong&gt;

WHO KNEW KRISTOL WAS SUCH A FEMINIST?.... Throughout much of the presidential campaign, Bill Kristol spent a considerable amount of time trashing Hillary Clinton and explaining to Fox News viewers, &quot;White women are a problem, that&#039;s, you know -- we.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Who knew Kristol was such a feminist?...</strong></p>
<p>WHO KNEW KRISTOL WAS SUCH A FEMINIST?.... Throughout much of the presidential campaign, Bill Kristol spent a considerable amount of time trashing Hillary Clinton and explaining to Fox News viewers, "White women are a problem, that's, you know -- we.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zelsdorf Ragshaft III</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/why_not_hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-507475</link>
		<dc:creator>Zelsdorf Ragshaft III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24961#comment-507475</guid>
		<description>clounis, I guess you are afraid of what Romney`brings to the GOP ticket.  Huckabee is a bigot.  Another question for you. clounis, is it your opinion Obama or Biden are not rich?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>clounis, I guess you are afraid of what Romney`brings to the GOP ticket.  Huckabee is a bigot.  Another question for you. clounis, is it your opinion Obama or Biden are not rich?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
