working

POPULAR TAGS

 Outside the Beltway 

WINE BLOGGING

Avia Pinot Grigio (Slovenia) 2002

I didn’t even know Slovenia made wine, let alone exported it to the U.S. But, given their proximity to Italy, I shouldn’t have been surprised that they made a pinot grigio.

Rating: 2 I like pinot grigios and this one was priced so low (on sale for around $4) that it was impossible to resist picking up a bottle. Although made from the same grape as chardonays, pinot grigios tend to be less dry and a bit fruiter. The Avia was an exception on both counts. Indeed, this wine is more reminiscent of a chablis jug wine than any pinot grigio I’ve tried before. Fortunately, I only bought the one bottle.

See this post for the scale and methodology.

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack

 
Comments
 

While I like whites with a bit more fruity taste (ala Reisling and Peisporters), I'll take your advice. I like red wines quite a bit and would recommend one of my favorites: Gabianno Chianti 2002, or even the Gabianno Classico Chianti 1999 as great budget reds with a perfect balance of tanin-to-sweet. It may not quite hit your budget (it varies from 8.99-12.49). Worth a try if you come upon it.

Posted by colson | January 17, 2004 | 02:43 am | Permalink
 

Pinot Grigio's have never been a favorite of mine, nice as a summer picnic drink on occasion but not much more to them. The Italian's have gotten much better recently but they are still not much more then a pleasant drink. If you are looking for good, cheap white try some of the below $10 Australian Chardonnays. They quality level is very high, my personal favorite and my house white is the Lindemann's Bin 65 which you can get for under $6 if you shop around. I've been drinking it for at least 10 years and it is not only very high quality for a wine of that price but it is amazingly consistent from year to year.
Other inexpensive whites worth exploring are dry rieslings and gewurztraminers from California and Australia. They are seriously underappreciated by the public at large (as are the more serious desert versions), and are easily the equal of Chardonnay. They also pair better with spicy food, especially curries, than any other wine. If you want to try a great, world class Gewurztraminer (for world class money) try some of the great Alsatians (Zind Humbrecht, Marcel Deiss). Trimbach and Hugel also make very nice bottles under $20. Very good California Gewurz include Beringer, Martinelli, Fetzer, all inexpensive.

Good drinking.

---

Posted by John Hudock | January 17, 2004 | 09:35 am | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 

WINE BLOGGING

Apparently, blogging about wine is all the rage in the blogosphere. Rather than risk getting left behind, OTB is getting aboard this trend before it’s too late. Unfortunately, I really don’t know anything about wine, other than it’s made from rotten grapes and can give you a buzz if consumed in excess. But, as regular OTB readers can attest, having little or no knowledge about a subject has never stopped me before.

My criteria:

  • Only fancy-schmancy wines will be reviewed. By “fancy-schmancy,” I mean not only that the wine comes encased in glass rather than a plastic bladder surrounded by a cardboard box but that the top doesn’t screw off, instead requiring removal of a cork.

  • The wine will not have cost more than $10 for a standard .750 liter bottle. More likely, it will have cost under $7.
  • The wine will never have been featured on an episode of Sanford & Son.
  • I will have purchased and consumed the wine in question quite recently. Indeed, I’ll likely be doing so during the review.

I’ll rate wines conforming to those rigorous standards on a 5-point scale:

    1- I’d rather be in a pine box on a slow train to Georgia than drink this ever again.

    2-The wine equivalent of BlogSpot.

    3-Something I’d drink any day–but I wouldn’t shoot a man in Reno just for another bottle.

    4-Dang, this is good! I might be willing to pay $11 a bottle for this.

    5-Better than an InstaLanche.

Also, to the extent wine reviewing is a matter of personal taste rather than scientific training, I tend not to enjoy particularly dry wines, so keep that in mind.

The first entrant:

Robert’s Rock Shiraz/Malbec (South Africa, Western Cape) 2001

The first South African wine I can recall purchasing and the first Malbec, so I don’t have a baseline against which to judge this aside from other Shiraz and Shiraz blends I’ve had (mostly Australian–Yellow Tail and Alice White, most notably).

Rating: 3.5 Certainly something I’ll buy again in the future. Less dry than a typical Shiraz and with a distinctive spicy flavor.

For those who prefer technical information, the following is from the vintner’s web site,

VINIFICATION:
Grapes selected from the Stellenbosch and Paarl regions. The must was fermented on the skins until dry. After malolactic fermentation, the wine was matured in oak for 8 months before it was blended, fined, stabilised and bottled.

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION:
Medium bodied wine that shows good colour. Exciting aroma profile shows cherry and raspberry flavours with undertones of sweet smoky spices. The wine portrays good fruit and juicy flavours on the palate with a sweet soft finish.

SERVING SUGGESTION:
Serve with barbecued chicken, moussaka, cottage pie, pasta and country pates.

I’ve never had moussaka or cottage pie in my life, but will give this one a go next time I have barbecued chicken or pasta.

Wine-gourmet.com had this review of the 1999: “A great, medium bodied red with polished flavors of sweet plum and vanilla and a touch of white pepper on the finish. Drink now. Definitely a good house red that won’t break the budget!”

What more could one ask for?

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack
 
Comments
 

How much did it go for on the East Coast? Enquiring minds, you know . . .

Posted by Little Miss Attila | January 1, 2004 | 11:51 pm | Permalink
 

You know that two buck Chuck (Charles Shaw) is available at local (northern VA) Trader Joe's, right? Only it costs $3 instead of the $2 in California.

Posted by Sam | January 2, 2004 | 12:18 am | Permalink
 

LMA: I'd have to dig out the receipt, but I found it on sale at the local Giant supermarket for under $7--maybe even under $6.

Sam: Never tried the Chuck. I'm a bit leery of wines famous for being $2 but will look for it if I'm ever at Trader Joe's.

Posted by James Joyner | January 2, 2004 | 09:10 am | Permalink
 

> 2-The wine equivalent of BlogSpot.

Come on. BlogSpot isn't THAT bad. It should be at least a "3"

Also, 2 Buck Chuck doesn't do anything for me, so just buy a single bottle and try before anything more.

Posted by Director Mitch | January 2, 2004 | 12:08 pm | Permalink
 

A lot of wines I can't stand to drink, Charles Shaw is at least (and perhaps at most) acceptable for drinking. However, it is a very good value for use as cooking wines.

Posted by Sam | January 2, 2004 | 02:26 pm | Permalink
 

I'm found some pretty drinkable reds at Trader Joe's for $2. But then, I'm in California, where most of the high-end varietals are grown.

I didn't realize Trader Joe's had spread to the East Coast--last I knew, they'd only got as far East as Arizona.

Basically, a bottle of wine should cost $5-$7, unless it's for a special occasion. And a glass of wine should be $4 (but they are often $6, even for a house Merlot at an unpretentious little Italian place).

Posted by Little Miss Attila | January 3, 2004 | 05:53 am | Permalink
 

JJ,

Give this wonderful Shiraz/Cabernet mix a swig:

Jacob's Creek - 2001; from SE Austrailia

My brother-in-law and I have had a hard time finding anything under $10 to beat this wonderful wine. Here in Michigan I have found this wine as low as $7 a bottle.

Happy New Year all!

Posted by Todd | January 4, 2004 | 10:06 am | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
Lijit Logo
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner

For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

MANzine logo

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2009 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.