working

POPULAR TAGS

 Outside the Beltway 

Wolfowitz Threatens Reciprocity

According to a “key witness” in the investigation into the propriety of his getting his girlfriend, Shaha Riza, a new job with guaranteed pay raises and top performance reviews, World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz threatened, “If they [screw] with me or Shaha, I have enough on them to [screw] them too.”

The quote, sanitized for sensitive readers, is doubly amusing given the context.

via Political Wire

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack

 
Comments
 

Combined with the Godfather scene that James Comey testified to today, it's getting harder to distinguish the Bush administration from a bunch of 3d-rate wannabe gangsters.

(Needs a post, JJ -- the FBI director *ordering* his agents not to let Andy Card and Gonzales shove Comey out of Ashcroft's room?)

Posted by Anderson | May 15, 2007 | 04:36 pm | Permalink
 

So it's wrong to stand up to bullying europeans? It's wrong to say something like Wolfowitz said in private?

Posted by Steve Plunk | May 15, 2007 | 04:41 pm | Permalink
 

Just remember, valiant Republicans: we were told it was OK that Dubya wasn't the brighest bulb in the package because he'd surround himself with excellent advisers. Like Rumsfield. Cheney. Gonzales. Wolfowitz. Etc.

Posted by M1EK | May 15, 2007 | 04:48 pm | Permalink
 

Rule by fear doesn't seem to be working out so well.

Hell between Bremer and Tenet it's hard to even get a good patsy these days. They make baby Oswald cry.

Posted by Tlaloc | May 15, 2007 | 05:29 pm | Permalink
 

So it's wrong to stand up to bullying europeans? It's wrong to say something like Wolfowitz said in private?

Umm... yes, Steve. He as much as admits he's dirty, but threatens to take others down with him if he's called on his crimes. And given the implied admission, they're not "bullying" him - that's a crap way to try and frame the debate away from Wolfie's ethical problems. I suppose nothing is inexcusable if you're a Republican...

Posted by legion | May 15, 2007 | 06:40 pm | Permalink
 

Wolfowitz has basically starved people in Africa in the name of fighting corruption, so it is hard to see how calling him to account on his own corrupt acts counts as "bullying".

Posted by Anjin-San | May 16, 2007 | 12:38 am | Permalink
 

LOL! They are after him because he is reforming a truly sick organization. I am happy that President Bush is sticking by him.

The only organization sicker than the World Bank? The democrat party.

Posted by Christopher | May 16, 2007 | 12:44 am | Permalink
 

Good to see the sub 75 IQ crowd is sticking by Wolfowitz...

Posted by Anjin-San | May 16, 2007 | 01:16 am | Permalink
 

LOL! They are after him because he is reforming a truly sick organization. I am happy that President Bush is sticking by him.

The only organization sicker than the World Bank? The democrat party.

Right. I particularly detested how the Dems sheltered that text-messaging pedophile last year. Sure swung my vote!

Posted by Anderson | May 16, 2007 | 08:14 am | Permalink
 

Was he a pedophile, or are you listening to your own propoganda.

When you read that Wolf did exactly what the WB ethics advisor told him to do, which was similar to what many others in the WB have done, and you see the WB hirarchy still proceeding then you know he has been set up.

For the pin heads writing here opposing Wolf. to suggest he is immoral shows they are either ignorant, playing politics or spending to much time with their pointy heads sticking in the ground.

Posted by davod | May 16, 2007 | 10:00 am | Permalink
 

Anjin-San,

You're back to personal insults instead of sticking to the issue at hand.

Like others have said, Wolfowitz tried to recuse himself and was told not to. He then consulted with the ethics authorities on how to proceed.

This is an orchestrated hit on a leader looking to make institutional changes.

Posted by Steve Plunk | May 16, 2007 | 11:39 am | Permalink
 

This is an orchestrated hit on a leader looking to make institutional changes.

*shrug*

even if true, this particular leader has needed to be hit for some time. I'll not shed any tears over poor wolfowitz.

Posted by Tlaloc | May 16, 2007 | 01:03 pm | Permalink
 

Steve,

I am pretty tired of people who parrot Bushs infantile "demorcat party" crap. When I hear it I am going to feel free to place a golf ball on their flat little heads and tee off...

Posted by Anjin-San | May 16, 2007 | 02:41 pm | Permalink
 

Anjin-San,

With due respect you can do better and it helps keep the debate on a higher level. Civility breeds respect even among adversaries.

Posted by Steve Plunk | May 16, 2007 | 05:25 pm | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
Lijit Logo
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner

For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

FOLLOW US

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

MANzine logo

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2009 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.