<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yet Another Appointee with Tax Problems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/yet_another_appointee_with_tax_problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/yet_another_appointee_with_tax_problems/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:46:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bigfire</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/yet_another_appointee_with_tax_problems/comment-page-1/#comment-1067973</link>
		<dc:creator>bigfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=38193#comment-1067973</guid>
		<description>As Leona Helmsley so famously put it &quot;Taxes are for little people&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Leona Helmsley so famously put it "Taxes are for little people".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.A.Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/yet_another_appointee_with_tax_problems/comment-page-1/#comment-1067918</link>
		<dc:creator>G.A.Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=38193#comment-1067918</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Here&#039;s the way it works: there&#039;s a three beer goggle for Washington people. New Yorkers get a two beer goggle discount. Californians have to make it on their own: the competition is much tougher out here.&lt;/blockquote&gt;In Wisconsin we get the girls drunk so that we are more appealing.....

Its like reverse psychology....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Here's the way it works: there's a three beer goggle for Washington people. New Yorkers get a two beer goggle discount. Californians have to make it on their own: the competition is much tougher out here.</p></blockquote>
<p>In Wisconsin we get the girls drunk so that we are more appealing.....</p>
<p>Its like reverse psychology....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Burgess</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/yet_another_appointee_with_tax_problems/comment-page-1/#comment-1067862</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Burgess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=38193#comment-1067862</guid>
		<description>More compelling reasons for The Fair Tax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More compelling reasons for The Fair Tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/yet_another_appointee_with_tax_problems/comment-page-1/#comment-1067618</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=38193#comment-1067618</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;LOL, you posting from the bar?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Here&#039;s the way it works: there&#039;s a three beer goggle for Washington people.  New Yorkers get a two beer goggle discount.  Californians have to make it on their own:  the competition is much tougher out here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>LOL, you posting from the bar?</p></blockquote>
<p>Here's the way it works: there's a three beer goggle for Washington people.  New Yorkers get a two beer goggle discount.  Californians have to make it on their own:  the competition is much tougher out here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.A.Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/yet_another_appointee_with_tax_problems/comment-page-1/#comment-1067494</link>
		<dc:creator>G.A.Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 00:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=38193#comment-1067494</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Besides, she&#039;s kind of hot. You know, for a bureaucrat.&lt;/blockquote&gt; LOL, you posting from the bar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Besides, she's kind of hot. You know, for a bureaucrat.</p></blockquote>
<p> LOL, you posting from the bar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.A.Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/yet_another_appointee_with_tax_problems/comment-page-1/#comment-1067450</link>
		<dc:creator>G.A.Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=38193#comment-1067450</guid>
		<description>Dude, Obama&#039;s friends ain&#039;t got no tax problems.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, Obama's friends ain't got no tax problems.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/yet_another_appointee_with_tax_problems/comment-page-1/#comment-1067398</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=38193#comment-1067398</guid>
		<description>Besides, she&#039;s kind of hot.  You know, for a bureaucrat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides, she's kind of hot.  You know, for a bureaucrat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just me</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/yet_another_appointee_with_tax_problems/comment-page-1/#comment-1067377</link>
		<dc:creator>just me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=38193#comment-1067377</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;That said, I would question the judgement of anyone not aware enough to track down $40, 000 owed to them. &lt;/em&gt;

I agree with this one.  I would think somebody would have a sense that they have overpaid taxes by 40k over two years.  Shoot I am well aware that the government owes me a few thousand each year and file to make sure I get the return.

I don&#039;t think failing to file a return, when money is owed is in the same league as failing to pay owed taxes or failing to claim income to avoid the tax.  But I can&#039;t help but wonder why Obama keeps running into trouble with nominees who can&#039;t seem to file tax returns, fill the forms out correctly, or pay taxes owed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>That said, I would question the judgement of anyone not aware enough to track down $40, 000 owed to them. </em></p>
<p>I agree with this one.  I would think somebody would have a sense that they have overpaid taxes by 40k over two years.  Shoot I am well aware that the government owes me a few thousand each year and file to make sure I get the return.</p>
<p>I don't think failing to file a return, when money is owed is in the same league as failing to pay owed taxes or failing to claim income to avoid the tax.  But I can't help but wonder why Obama keeps running into trouble with nominees who can't seem to file tax returns, fill the forms out correctly, or pay taxes owed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brainy435</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/yet_another_appointee_with_tax_problems/comment-page-1/#comment-1067347</link>
		<dc:creator>brainy435</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=38193#comment-1067347</guid>
		<description>As much as I would love to lump this in with the many other hypocritical appointments Obama has made, this doesn&#039;t belong. She&#039;s not a tax cheat.

That said, I would question the judgement of anyone not aware enough to track down $40, 000 owed to them. If she can&#039;t be bothered enough to follow through on these things when it&#039;s in her interest to do so, what is she going to let through when it&#039;s not her that will suffer the consequences? Or, if $40, 000 of her own money means so little to her, how much of OUR money will her office have to spend to get her attention?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I would love to lump this in with the many other hypocritical appointments Obama has made, this doesn't belong. She's not a tax cheat.</p>
<p>That said, I would question the judgement of anyone not aware enough to track down $40, 000 owed to them. If she can't be bothered enough to follow through on these things when it's in her interest to do so, what is she going to let through when it's not her that will suffer the consequences? Or, if $40, 000 of her own money means so little to her, how much of OUR money will her office have to spend to get her attention?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: odograph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/yet_another_appointee_with_tax_problems/comment-page-1/#comment-1067333</link>
		<dc:creator>odograph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=38193#comment-1067333</guid>
		<description>My first thought, before learning of the details, was that those folks in Washington were sending us a bad message ... that they apparently believe that if you don&#039;t pay taxes, the government isn&#039;t going to find you.

At least this one did try to pay taxes, and the government did find her.  One for the home team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first thought, before learning of the details, was that those folks in Washington were sending us a bad message ... that they apparently believe that if you don't pay taxes, the government isn't going to find you.</p>
<p>At least this one did try to pay taxes, and the government did find her.  One for the home team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kth</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/yet_another_appointee_with_tax_problems/comment-page-1/#comment-1067325</link>
		<dc:creator>kth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=38193#comment-1067325</guid>
		<description>&quot;Failure to file taxes&quot; (I understand it&#039;s the articles usage, and not yours) is a misnomer, and probably a deliberate one. One files tax &lt;i&gt;returns&lt;/i&gt;, but one does not file taxes, one pays them (or fails to). And this person did pay, in fact was entitled to a refund:&lt;blockquote&gt;Ms. Marshall may fare better because, after ultimately filing the 2005 and 2006 federal and local paperwork, she was entitled to $37,259 in refunds, according to data she provided to Mr. Lugar.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Undoubtedly it&#039;s not cool not to file returns. But this isn&#039;t remotely the same as someone not paying their taxes, or only paying them when they were about to be considered for a big appointment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Failure to file taxes" (I understand it's the articles usage, and not yours) is a misnomer, and probably a deliberate one. One files tax <i>returns</i>, but one does not file taxes, one pays them (or fails to). And this person did pay, in fact was entitled to a refund:<br />
<blockquote>Ms. Marshall may fare better because, after ultimately filing the 2005 and 2006 federal and local paperwork, she was entitled to $37,259 in refunds, according to data she provided to Mr. Lugar.</p></blockquote>
<p>Undoubtedly it's not cool not to file returns. But this isn't remotely the same as someone not paying their taxes, or only paying them when they were about to be considered for a big appointment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
