YouTube the Craig’s List of Local Television?
 |
James Joyner | Friday, March 30, 2007 |
Jeff Jarvis reflects on a reader’s observation that the advent of viral online videos at YouTube and elsewhere may have the same impact on the bottom lines of local television affiliates as Craig’s List did for local newspapers. It’s an interesting point and one I think has some merit.
About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.
Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
- None Found
- OTB Radio – Tonight at 5:30 Eastern
- Journalism as Friend Building
- UPS vs. FedEx Whiteboard Video
- Obama Hurt Deeds in Virginia
- Reading the Bill is a Waste of Time
- Abbas: Palestinian Authority May Disband
- Jodi Rell Not Running
- Caption Contest Winners
- OTB Latenight – Styx
- Berlin Wall Fall: 20 Years Later
One big difference is the direct substitution effect. Local newspapers derived considerable revenue from their classifieds. Those pages were likely the highest marginal profit pages. Relatively low cost to produce and chock full of tiny ads paid for by people. Craig's list let people put those ads up for less money. So the people with the money (the advertisers in the classifieds) got their needs met another way and started taking their money with them.
Youtube threatens local television's eyeball time, but that only indirectly threatens local televisions advertisement time. When youtube starts making you watch a 30 second commercial for every 5 minutes of video (or whatever ratio makes sense), then it will really be a threat. Because then the advertisers can get their needs met by working with youtube and then the local stations will start to hurt.
Comments are Closed
