<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YUCK FACTOR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/yuck_factor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/yuck_factor/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:12:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/yuck_factor/comment-page-1/#comment-11837</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4921#comment-11837</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The arguments about âthe sanctity of marriageâ and such are a smokescreen for âthe yuck factor.â&lt;/i&gt;

From the chair of a single nontheist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The arguments about âthe sanctity of marriageâ and such are a smokescreen for âthe yuck factor.â</i></p>
<p>From the chair of a single nontheist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/yuck_factor/comment-page-1/#comment-11838</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4921#comment-11838</guid>
		<description>Well, true. But, unless we&#039;re going to outlaw quickie marriages, easy divorce, no-fault divorce, serial marriage, and all the other things that violate the spirit of the institution, the &quot;sanctity&quot; argument is rather hollow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, true. But, unless we're going to outlaw quickie marriages, easy divorce, no-fault divorce, serial marriage, and all the other things that violate the spirit of the institution, the "sanctity" argument is rather hollow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/yuck_factor/comment-page-1/#comment-11839</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4921#comment-11839</guid>
		<description>Plasticized cadavers are to art what rotten.com is to the National Gallery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plasticized cadavers are to art what rotten.com is to the National Gallery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Hackbarth</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/yuck_factor/comment-page-1/#comment-11840</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Hackbarth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4921#comment-11840</guid>
		<description>Hayek made a point that culture contains knowledge passed down from previous generations. He would take an evolutionary angle and claim that those cultural traits that were passed on were because they allowed the adherents to survive. I think Hayek would also argue that ignoring the &quot;yuck factor&quot; by attempting to find an intellectually coherent position reaks of &quot;scientism.&quot; To guess at whether Hayek would have backed gay marriage there&#039;s Virginia Postrel&#039;s interesting &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2004/01/11/hayek_on_gay_marriage/&quot;&gt;little article&lt;/a&gt;.




---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hayek made a point that culture contains knowledge passed down from previous generations. He would take an evolutionary angle and claim that those cultural traits that were passed on were because they allowed the adherents to survive. I think Hayek would also argue that ignoring the "yuck factor" by attempting to find an intellectually coherent position reaks of "scientism." To guess at whether Hayek would have backed gay marriage there's Virginia Postrel's interesting <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2004/01/11/hayek_on_gay_marriage/">little article</a>.</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
