Outside the Beltway

Seems about right.

When prejudice overrides simple humanity.

Who knew they got cell reception?

A regional chain registered it in 1989. Has it become generic?

The nation’s highest court has gone all woke.

The former president faces multiple criminal prosecutions.

The jury awarded $5 million in damages

The punishments are increasing as the worst of the worst are sentenced.

The worst of the worst Capitol Riot players have been brought to justice.

New documents reveal the internal deliberations of the Court.

International law enforcement agencies have made hundreds of arrests.

The New York Times looks into ties between a DC area law school and the Supreme Court.

The Chief Justice’s wife is making a lot of money.

Turns out that costing your employer nearly a billion dollars isn’t good for your career.

Is a threat in the eye of the receiver or the issuer?

A $787.5 million flesh wound.

A few people are committing the lion’s share of petty thefts in America’s biggest city.

An outrageous political stunt.

It’s time to ban a growing and dangerous practice.

The questionable ethics of living a lavish lifestyle based on high office.

A sensible compromise on a controversial issue.

Legal analysts are skeptical.

It has begun.

Calls for violence have been widespread but are unlikely to be heeded.

And so it begins?

Donald Trump is apparently not the only one with a fetish for war criminals.

Balancing the public’s desire to know and the potential for harm is not easy.

Who should pay whom for what?

The court declined to review a preacher’s lawsuit against my alma mater.

The huckster is exploiting bankruptcy laws and the financial regulations to circumvent court judgments.

A pending lawsuit seeks to settle those questions.

The Manhattan DA could move as early as next week.

The Russian leader’s status as an international pariah is cemented.

The Baretta actor and acquitted murderer is dead at 89.

A wrongheaded if longstanding position.

Should we expect privacy from our own cameras?

“Classical liberals” really need to rediscover self examination

Some Democrats are angry!

Politics and justice are in tension.

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority is signaling an unfavorable ruling.

The jury forewoman is offering hints.

An aggressive but expected move.

Culling for the primary feeder job in American legal system begins in high school.

Why was it released to the public?

Here we go again.

Where do we draw the line?

It turns out that the candy flavored booze at the grocery store isn’t even bourbon.

The Supreme Court’s internal investigation was inconclusive.

At what point does negligence become a crime?